[尹 탄핵 14일 2차 표결] National Assembly questions on ‘Rebellion Act’ issue
When asked, “Is there anyone on the State Council who opposes martial law?” choi Sang-mok and Jo Tae-yeol are the only two people to raise their hands.
Yoon Sang-hyun’s “Martial Law Political Act” is a response to Noh Goseong… 野 “Special Forces, carrying shotguns and explosives”
“I tried to stop president Yoon Seok-yeol, but I could not. “I am truly sorry and feel a lot of guilt.”
Prime Minister Han Deok-soo attended the plenary session of the national Assembly on the 11th and responded to the Cabinet meeting to intentional martial law on December 3, saying, “It would have been really short if (the State Council members) had all gathered together.” As Prime Minister Han said that the Cabinet meeting did not proceed normally at the time, controversy over whether martial law was illegal in terms of procedures is expected to spread.Prime Minister Han bowed and apologized four times in response to the opposition party’s request for an apology, and the state Council members, except for Minister of Employment and Labor Kim Moon-soo, also stood up and bowed their heads. Conversely, members of the People Power Party who took questions at the plenary session on this day made statements defending President Yoon, such as saying, “Legally, it does not constitute a crime of treason,” leading to strong opposition from opposition party members.
● “尹’s first word is ‘I didn’t discuss it with anyone.’”
In the ‘Urgent Questions on president Yoon seok-yeol’s unconstitutional declaration of martial law and acts of rebellion’ held at the plenary session of the National Assembly on this day, Prime Minister Han said, “The procedures that are usually held at the Cabinet meeting
Actually, according to the Ministry of Public administration and Security, the cabinet meeting regarding the deliberation of martial law declaration was held in the Presidential Office reception room for five minutes from 10:17 to 22 p.m. on the 3rd. The Ministry of Public Administration and Security released the list of 11 State Council members, including President Yoon and Prime Minister Han, who attended and attended the meeting. The cabinet meeting related to the lifting was held for just two minutes from 4:27 to 29 a.m. on the next day, the 4th, in the Presidential Office’s cabinet meeting room.
Representative Lee So-young of the Democratic Party of Korea asked the State Council members, “Which of the State Council members sitting here clearly expressed their opinion in front of the President on December 3rd that they are opposed to martial law? When he said, “Raise your hands,” only two people, including Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy and Finance Choi Sang-mok and Minister of Foreign Affairs Cho Tae-yeol, raised their hands. Prime Minister Han added,“I told the president that I am against it.”
● “There is no transcript of remarks from the President’s Office or Cabinet meeting.”
The Ministry of Public Administration and security said on this day, “The President’s Office responded that it did not possess the substance of the cabinet meeting’s remarks at the time.” Former Minister of Public Administration and Security Lee Sang-min said at the National Assembly’s Public Administration and security Committee on the 5th, “We will receive relevant data from the President’s Office and disclose it as soon as possible as soon as we finish preparing the minutes,” but the President’s Office insisted that there was no transcript of remarks.
Rep. Yoon Sang-hyun of the People Power Party, who took questions that day, referred to martial law as a “high level political act” and received strong protests from opposition party members. Rep. Yoon argued, “According to the 2010 Supreme Court precedent, the unconstitutionality of highly political acts is judged while respecting the president’s authority and refraining from judicial review.” Rep. Yoon mentioned the requirements for constituting treason under the criminal law and said, “If you look at the situation at the time, the military did not go to any media or broadcasting company, but only the National Assembly and the Election Commission went,” and said that martial law did not legally constitute a treason.
Shouts poured out at Rep. Yoon from the opposition party’s seats, and National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-sik also pointed out his remarks, saying, “The military entered the National Assembly with guns by order of the President.”
Democratic Party lawmaker Park Seon-won claimed that the 707th Special Mission Group, a member of the Special Operations Command, which was deployed to the National assembly as martial law troops, was carrying shotguns and explosives. Representative Park presented a photo taken at the scene and said,“Martial law troops were holding explosive equipment and explosives to open a passage,” and “A blue line of detonators was also found on the members’ vests.”
Reporter Myungjin yoon [email protected]
Reporter Song Yu-geun [email protected]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
Hot news now