–

The commander of the Islamic Revolutionary ⁤Guard Corps (IRGC), Hossein ⁣Salami, issued a harsh statement against Israel, calling the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon a “strategic defeat” ⁢for the Jewish state.

In his message to Hezbollah deputy leader Naim Qassem, he stressed that this event is evidence of “the weakening of⁢ Israel and a harbinger‌ of ​its disappearance.”

Salami also noted that the IDF allegedly‍ failed to achieve its military goals ⁢in lebanon, which was further evidence of Israel’s “weakness” in the current conflict.

In turn, Hezbollah throughout the war declared its readiness to continue attacks on Israel until its military operation in ​the Gaza Strip was ‌entirely stopped.

However, he stressed that Iran ‍reserves the right to respond to airstrikes ‌carried out by ​Israel on Iranian territory last month.

Speaking about the prospects ‌for a truce⁤ reached through israel’s‍ agreement with Lebanon, araghchi said that despite ‌iran’s ‍continued official position aimed ‌at eliminating Israel as a state, he hoped that the truce could develop into a long-term ceasefire.

Answering the question about whether this⁢ agreement can reduce tensions between Israel and Iran, the minister noted that further developments of the situation will⁢ depend solely on the actions of‍ Israel itself.

Earlier, Kursor reported that Iran boldly commented on ⁢the truce between Israel and Lebanon.

Iran welcomed the end of Israeli “aggression” ‍in Lebanon.

Interview with Dr. ‍Amir Khalil,Middle East Politics Expert

Time.news​ Editor: Thank you for joining us today, Dr.‌ Khalil. We’ve seen some striking developments ⁤regarding the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps‌ (IRGC) commander hossein ⁤Salami’s recent ⁢statements ⁤against Israel, particularly in the context‌ of the ceasefire⁣ agreement ‌in ‌Lebanon. How do you interpret Salami’s claim that the ceasefire represents a “strategic defeat” for Israel?

Dr. Amir Khalil: Thank you for having me. Salami’s assertion is ‍quite meaningful.He implies that the ceasefire not only signifies a military setback for Israel but also reflects a broader decline in its regional influence. By describing the‌ situation⁢ as a weakening⁢ of‍ Israeli ​power, he seeks to bolster Hezbollah’s position and signal Iran’s backing of its allies. This rhetoric aims to portray israel⁢ as vulnerable, ⁤especially​ after the IDF’s inability to achieve its military objectives in Lebanon.

Time.news Editor: That’s intriguing. Given the ongoing ‍conflict‌ dynamics, how does Hezbollah’s stance⁤ of⁣ continuing attacks on Israel until the Gaza operations‌ cease play into this narrative?

Dr.Amir ‍Khalil: hezbollah’s​ readiness to continue its offensive is a critical element. it ​effectively pressures israel while displaying a united front alongside Iran. By‌ framing thier actions as a response to Israeli aggression, Hezbollah reinforces its legitimacy in the ‌eyes‍ of its supporters. ​This directly ties ⁤into Salami’s narrative of Israel’s weakening position, as hezbollah’s resilience could enhance⁢ their strategic reach and‍ influence ‍across ⁣the region.

Time.news Editor: There’s also the‍ mention⁣ of Iran reserving the right to retaliate against Israel for airstrikes on Iranian territory.‍ How does this affect the potential for ⁤de-escalation amid these tensions?

Dr. Amir ​Khalil: ⁢It complicates the situation considerably. While‍ Iran officially presents a​ stance aimed at neutralizing Israel, this assertion of retaliation ⁤suggests readiness for confrontation. The⁢ prospects for de-escalation hinge on Israel’s actions moving forward. Should Israel seek to avoid further provocations, ‍there might be room for a lengthy ceasefire. However,⁤ any aggressive maneuvers ​could very well ⁣trigger further Iranian involvement and⁢ escalate ⁢tensions.

Time.news Editor: You mentioned a long-term ceasefire.​ Based on the current agreements, what ‌are the chances of actually achieving lasting peace between⁢ these entities?

Dr. Amir Khalil: That’s ⁤the million-dollar question. While there’s hope, particularly from‍ Iranian officials like Araghchi who seek to pivot towards a long-term⁤ truce, the success of any‍ ceasefire ultimately⁤ rests on⁤ mutual confidence-building measures. If Israel demonstrates​ a commitment to⁣ refrain from further aggression, it‌ might⁢ open pathways for dialogue.However, as we ‌have seen historically, entrenched positions and mutual distrust often define relations in‍ this volatile ⁤region.

Time.news Editor: In light of these developments, what practical advice would ⁤you give to our⁤ readers ⁤regarding how to stay informed about Middle eastern politics?

Dr. Amir Khalil: Staying ‍informed requires cross-referencing diverse news sources for ⁤a well-rounded ⁢view. Following expert analyses and insights,rather⁤ than just headlines,can provide deeper understanding. Additionally, engaging with regional think tanks and scholarly⁤ articles⁣ on Middle​ Eastern ⁢affairs can be‍ invaluable. As⁢ events unfold, understanding the nuances of political rhetoric and military actions will help readers grasp the complexities of​ the situation.

Time.news editor: ⁣thank ⁢you,⁢ Dr. Khalil,⁤ for ⁣sharing your insights on this ⁤critical topic. It’s essential for our readers to grasp the implications of these‍ statements and actions in the region.

Dr.Amir ⁢khalil: Thank you for the prospect. this is indeed a pivotal⁣ moment in Middle⁣ Eastern politics, and it’s vital that the conversation continues.