–

Today it became known that the⁢ US Air ⁤Force provided significant support to Arab-Kurdish forces in Syria, which allowed them to take new positions in the province of Deir Ez-Zor.

Units of the Syrian Democratic Forces, operating with the support of‍ an​ international coalition led ‍by the ‍United⁤ States, took control of seven settlements on the‌ left bank⁢ of the Euphrates River. Among⁣ them are Al-Hussaniya,Al-Salihiyah,Hatla,Marrat,Mazlum,Hisham and At-tabiya.

The operation was supported by US Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft, as well as US artillery. Together, they launched strikes ⁢against the positions of the Bashar al-Assad regime and its supporting militias. These forces where forced to retreat. At this time, there have ⁣been no reports of casualties.

the⁣ Pentagon⁢ explained the need for this operation ​by the growing threat from islamic State militants ‌in the region. The strikes and seizure of positions were called a forced measure to ensure security in a strategically important area.

Earlier, kursor reported that the Russian Federation ‍is sending mercenaries ​from PMCs to Syria.

Rotations of the Russian military ⁤contingent​ in Syria have been suspended; only mercenaries ⁤from PMCs are sent there.

What are the roles of the Syrian Democratic⁣ Forces (SDF)⁣ in the U.S.Air Force operations in Deir Ez-Zor?

Title: Insights on U.S.air Force Operations in Deir ez-zor: An Interview with Defense Expert Dr. Emily Hart

Q1: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Hart. Can‍ you summarize the recent operations by the U.S. Air​ Force in Syria and ‍their implications for regional ‌security?

Dr. Hart: Absolutely. The U.S. Air Force has significantly ‌supported Arab-Kurdish‌ forces, specifically ​the Syrian Democratic ⁤Forces (SDF), ⁤in Syria’s Deir Ez-Zor province.​ This operation⁢ has led to ⁢the SDF taking control of seven settlements along the left bank of the Euphrates River, ‍which include⁣ strategic areas like Al-Hussaniya and Al-Salihiyah. The Pentagon has framed this operation as a necessary response⁢ to the increasing threat from⁤ ISIS militants, marking a critical⁤ shift in the ​ongoing ​geopolitical dynamics of the region.

Q2: What do you think ​prompted the U.S. to intensify its military engagement in Syria at‌ this ‍time?

dr.​ Hart: The surge in‍ ISIS activity⁤ in the region coupled⁣ with the complex interactions involving the Assad regime ⁢and Iranian-backed militias likely played a ‌vital role.‍ The Pentagon has stated that these airstrikes and ground operations were essential ​for maintaining security in a region considered strategically important for both local and international stakeholders. Supporting the SDF not only⁣ undermines the Assad regime’s control but also actively mitigates the resurgence of terrorist groups.

Q3: ⁢How do these developments affect the​ balance of ‍power in Syria, especially regarding Russian involvement?

Dr. ⁣Hart: The U.S. operations may complicate the already intricate balance ​of power in Syria. Russia’s recent decision to send‍ mercenaries to Syria, as reported, indicates⁤ that they are adjusting their strategies to maintain influence as U.S. engagements increase. ‍The ⁢rotation of ⁣Russian military units being suspended suggests​ a reliance on ⁤private military ‍contractors.This shift might affect ‌how both U.S. and Russian forces operate, perhaps leading ‍to ⁣more direct confrontations.

Q4: ⁤What are the potential‍ risks involved⁣ with the U.S.’s latest‌ military ⁢actions in Syria?

Dr.‍ Hart: several risks are inherent in this approach. First,there’s the⁣ possibility of an escalation of conflict with Assad’s ⁤forces,which could lead to​ civilian casualties and broader⁣ regional instability. Second, increased military presence might provoke a more aggressive response from Russia and Iranian-backed militias. Lastly, the​ ongoing instability could hinder humanitarian efforts and complicate⁤ the prospects for a‌ diplomatic resolution to the conflict.

Q5: For our readers looking to understand the implications ‍of these events, what should they pay close attention to in the coming weeks?

Dr. Hart: Readers should monitor the​ reactions from both the Assad regime and Russia ⁤to⁢ U.S. operations, as these will be critical in shaping‍ the future of regional dynamics. ​Furthermore, keep an eye on local developments regarding ISIS and whether the SDF can ‌maintain its gains. Also,changes in U.S. policy⁣ or⁤ troop deployment strategy may provide insights into Washington’s long-term⁤ intentions in⁢ Syria and its approach to⁣ combating terrorism in the‍ region.

Q6: Lastly, what practical advice would you give to policymakers⁢ regarding U.S. involvement in​ Syria?

Dr.⁤ Hart: Policymakers need to strike ‌a careful balance between ⁣military ‍operations and diplomatic initiatives. Engaging in dialog with regional partners, including Kurdish forces, while also considering ⁢the ramifications of U.S. actions‌ on local populations is crucial.Additionally, investing​ in reconstruction efforts and socio-economic development can help stabilize the region and prevent future security threats. A comprehensive​ approach is ​essential for lasting peace‌ and security in Syria.

Conclusion: As the situation in⁢ Deir Ez-Zor continues to evolve, the implications for regional stability and the fight against terrorism remain critical. Understanding the dynamics at play will be key for both observers and ⁢policymakers alike.