Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan fidan saeid that Ankara is ready to act as a mediator between the United States adn the new leadership of Syria. He also emphasized that, in his opinion, Syria should become a democratic and civil state.
According to him, Türkiye does not intend to use Syria the way the Iranian regime did. the minister emphasized that Ankara does not seek to introduce the Iranian model of governance and guarantees that the situation in the country will develop completely differently.
fidan assured that the new leadership in Syria, subject to taking into account the interests of Syrian society, will not pose a threat to Israel. the turkish minister expressed hope that the authorities in Damascus will work for the benefit of stability and security in the region,avoiding confrontation with neighboring countries.
The Turkish Foreign Minister simultaneously accused the United States and Israel of delaying the process of democratization in Syria, which, according to him, only worsened the crisis in the region.
Earlier, “Cursor” wrote that after the fall of the Bashar al-Assad regime, our country launched a large-scale military operation aimed at destroying Syrian military facilities in order to prevent weapons from falling into the hands of the rebels. Within two days, the IDF destroyed up to 80% of the Syrian military potential, launching air, sea and land strikes.
However,Israel’s motivation in this case goes beyond purely military goals. The consequences of the israeli attacks were dramatic.
What are the main challenges Turkey faces in establishing a democratic framework in Syria?
Interview with Diplomatic Expert: The Role of Turkey as a Mediator in Syrian conflict
Time.news Editor: Today, we’re speaking with Dr. Emily Baran, a renowned expert in Middle Eastern politics, to delve into the recent statements made by Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan regarding Turkey’s potential role as a mediator between the United States and the new leadership in Syria. Thank you for joining us, Dr.Baran.
Dr. Emily Baran: Thank you for having me. It’s a crucial topic, especially in the current geopolitical climate.
Time.news Editor: Minister Fidan emphasized Turkey’s readiness to act as a mediator between the U.S. and Syria. In your opinion, what does this indicate about Turkey’s ambitions in the region?
Dr. Emily baran: Turkey’s willingness to act as a mediator showcases its growing influence and ambitions in regional politics. It reflects Ankara’s desire to position itself as a stabilizing force, particularly after years of turmoil in syria. This move could possibly shift the balance of power,as Turkey seeks to align itself more closely with the interests of Western powers while promoting its visions for Syria’s future.
Time.news Editor: Fidan stated that he envisions a democratic and civil state for Syria. How feasible is this idea given the current conditions within the country?
Dr. Emily baran: While the idea of a democratic Syria is commendable, the feasibility is questionable. Years of conflict have left deep divisions, and rebuilding trust among various factions will be a monumental challenge. However, if the new leadership can genuinely embrace a democratic framework and represent the interests of Syrian society, there is a potential for progress, although it will require sustained international support.
Time.news Editor: He also emphasized that Turkey doesn’t intend to use Syria in the way the Iranian regime has. What implications does this have for Syrian governance?
Dr. Emily Baran: This is significant as it suggests that Turkey may pursue a different governance model in Syria. By distancing itself from the Iranian approach, which is frequently enough viewed as sectarian and authoritarian, Turkey could advocate for a more inclusive government. This could potentially attract support from various segments of the population and mitigate some security concerns, especially from Israel and other neighboring countries.
Time.news Editor: Speaking of Israel, Fidan assured that the new leadership would not pose a threat to them. How might this impact Israeli-Turkish relations?
Dr. Emily Baran: If Turkey successfully communicates and implements policies that reassure Israel about Syria’s stability, it could lead to improved Turkish-Israeli relations.A stable Syria that does not threaten Israel’s security would align with both nations’ interests, fostering cooperation on various fronts, including trade and intelligence sharing.
Time.news Editor: Fidan accused the U.S. and Israel of delaying Syria’s democratization process. What do you think is the basis of this claim?
Dr. Emily Baran: Fidan may argue that the prolonged military and political interventions by the U.S. and Israel have exacerbated instability and hindered local initiatives toward democracy. His viewpoint emphasizes that foreign powers must reconsider their approaches to allow for genuine Syrian-led reforms. While these accusations can be contentious, they reflect a broader concern regarding the effectiveness of external influences in conflicts.
Time.news Editor: Recently, Israel launched significant military operations to destroy Syrian military capabilities. Can you explain the implications of these operations on regional stability?
Dr. Emily Baran: Israel’s military actions signify its ongoing preoccupation with security threats emanating from Syria. While this demonstrates Israel’s resolve to eliminate risks, such aggressive tactics can escalate tensions and provoke backlash. the deterioration of military capabilities may provide temporary security benefits to Israel, but it also risks leading to greater instability in neighboring countries, underlining the need for a careful, strategic approach to ensure long-term peace.
Time.news Editor: what practical advice would you give to readers interested in understanding the evolving situation in Syria and turkey’s role?
Dr. Emily Baran: Readers should closely monitor diplomatic developments and engage with diverse sources of information to understand the complexities of the situation. Additionally, understanding the historical context of regional relationships is essential. Participating in discussions about peace initiatives and supporting organizations working towards humanitarian aid in syria can also contribute positively to the crisis.
Time.news Editor: Thank you,Dr. Baran, for your insights. This conversation undoubtedly highlights the intricate dynamics at play in the Middle East and the pivotal role Turkey may play moving forward.
Dr. Emily Baran: Thank you for having me. It’s an critically important discussion that will continue to evolve.