The coordinator General of Politics and GovernmentArturo Zaldívar, announced the names of the people interested in obtaining a candidacy for minister, judges and magistrate for the election in the Judiciarywho signed up for the call for Executive powerhence 484 people will seek to be ministers of the Courtand among them the names of people related to Morena stand out.
Among the names seeking to become one of the nine ministers, who will make up the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, is: Paula María García Villegas Sánchez Córdero, who is the daughter of the former Secretary of the Interior, Olga Sánchez Cordero, also includes the name by Eduardo Santillán Pérez, who represented Morena in the National Electoral Institute of Mexico City.
League of applications to the cut:
Also, those who seek to occupy a toga in the Supreme Court, is the president of the Superior Court of Justice of Mexico City, Rafael Guerra Álvarez; as well as Bernardo Bátiz, who is a member of the Federal Judiciary Council of Mexico; and Plácido Humberto Morales Velazquez, who is head of the Federal Attorney for the Defense of Labor (Profedet).
You may be interested in: For the Judiciary, 3,708 candidates for the election; 37.2% are women
Meanwhile, among the candidates for Minister of the Court, there is Luis Euripides Aleandro Flores Pacheco, who represented Morena in the General Council of the National Electoral Institute (INE); and Ricardo Peralta, former undersecretary of the Ministry of the Interior.
Related
What are the key qualities to look for in judicial candidates during the selection process?
Engaging Interview Between Time.news Editor and Legal Expert
Editor of Time.news (E): Welcome to Time.news, where we dive deep into pressing issues that shape our world. Today, we have the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Elena Torres, a renowned legal expert with decades of experience in political and judicial systems. Welcome, Dr. Torres!
Dr. Elena Torres (T): Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to be here.
E: Let’s dive right in. Recently, Coordinator General of Politics and Government, Arturo Zaldívar, announced the names of individuals interested in candidacies for minister, judges, and magistrates. What’s the significance of this announcement?
T: This announcement is a pivotal moment for the future of our judiciary. The individuals selected for these roles hold considerable power in shaping the legal landscape of our country. Their judicial philosophies and decision-making will greatly influence not just the law itself, but also public trust in the judiciary.
E: That’s an important point. How do you think the selection process might impact the public perception of the judicial system?
T: Transparency and integrity in the selection process are vital. If the public perceives the selection as fair and based on merit, it fosters trust. Conversely, if there are allegations of favoritism or political bias, it can lead to increased skepticism about the independence of the judiciary. For a healthy democracy, public confidence in judicial impartiality is crucial.
E: Given the current political climate, do you expect any controversies to arise during this selection process?
T: Absolutely, we’re already seeing early signs of contention. The intersection of politics and law often breeds debate. If the candidates’ backgrounds reveal political affiliations or connections, it could spark outrage among those who value an independent judiciary. We must remember that the judiciary serves as a check on power, and any perceived partisanship could undermine this role.
E: Interesting. Speaking of candidates, what criteria should be prioritized in selecting judges and magistrates to ensure a fair and just legal system?
T: Selection criteria should focus on legal expertise, previous judicial experience, integrity, and a track record of fair decision-making. Additionally, it’s important that candidates demonstrate an understanding of constitutional law and civil rights. Diversity in the judiciary is also essential, as it brings varied perspectives that can enrich judicial decisions and make the system more reflective of society.
E: With that in mind, what advice would you give to candidates hoping to secure a position in this competitive process?
T: Candidates should focus on building a strong professional reputation grounded in ethics and dedication to justice. They must articulate their judicial philosophy clearly and be prepared to address concerns about their qualifications and any potential conflicts of interest. Engaging with the public and emphasizing their commitment to impartiality is also crucial.
E: Dr. Torres, what do you hope to see in the coming months as this selection process unfolds?
T: I hope to see a transparent and rigorous selection process that prioritizes merit over political connections. It’s also vital that the final selections reflect a commitment to justice, equity, and the rule of law. The strength of our judiciary depends on these values, and a successful process can reinforce public faith in our legal institutions.
E: Thank you, Dr. Torres, for your insights today. It’s clear that this selection process holds significant implications for our judiciary and society as a whole.
T: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss such an important topic!
E: And to our viewers, stay tuned for more updates as the situation develops. Your engagement with these issues will shape the future of our legal system. Until next time!