RBB is said to have hunted down internal whistleblowers under Schlesinger’s predecessor
The RBB apparently has a system: Instead of questioning escalating costs, the whistleblowers are pursued. This is also the case with a tipster who pointed out years ago that a lawyer at RBB accumulated more than 9,000 euros in expenses in one year.
SFor months, Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg (RBB) has been criticized for alleged nepotism and expense scandals, and the Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office is investigating, among other things, ex-director Patricia Schlesinger. Documents and audit reports now show that under Schlesinger’s predecessor, Dagmar Reim, internal whistleblowers were sometimes severely pursued and audits influenced.
A case dates from 2014, reports the “Spiegel”. The focus was on the lawyer Michael K., who is still working for NDR today. At that time, he was sent to head the ARD General Secretariat located at RBB. In photocopied, anonymously written letters to the RBB, he was accused of misconduct, including exorbitant costs for “unnecessary trips” and dinner. The lawyer is said to have accumulated more than 9,000 euros in expenses within a year, more than a quarter of which was for taxi rides within Berlin and Hamburg.
Since the then NDR director and ARD chairman Lutz Marmor signed off on each of the trips, the revision would have saved itself from a “substantive review”, formally nothing was objected to. The “Spiegel” quotes the NDR, which reports that the accounts were “impeccable”, the accusation unfounded.
Instead of checking costs, the tipster was sought
Instead of questioning these costs, the then RBB boss Reim is said to have tried to locate the anonymous whistleblower internally. According to “Spiegel”, a former employee remembers this. The directorship is said not only to have suggested checking the copying systems in the building to see whether the letters had been duplicated there, but also to have suggested comparing the handwriting with that of employees. She is said to have even considered comprehensive screenings of hard drives, despite data protection.
The revision is said to have finally refused to search for the whistleblower, saying that there was “no legally acceptable way” to do so.
Reim is said to have interfered in investigations several times. Her advisor wrote to the revision that they would like to revise the “texts for the investigation” again. He is said to have later asked for it to be re-dated – “otherwise everyone will wonder why they received the report so late”. Reim did not want to comment on the “Spiegel” request, but let it be known that she considers the allegations to be unfounded.
“Kick-off Politics” is WELT’s daily news podcast. The most important topic analyzed by WELT editors and the dates of the day. Subscribe to the podcast at Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music or directly via RSS feed.