The bankruptcy of barriers it was “fortuitous” and, therefore, not to blame. This is what the Commercial Court No. 3 of Pontevedra has ruled, which with an order dated yesterday gives the definitive shelving to the bankruptcy process that ended with insolvencyand subsequent auction, of the Spain’s largest private shipyard.
The bankruptcy administration and the Prosecutor’s Office already they had coincided in qualifying the contest as “fortuitous”. The first, in his report, established that he did not see in the actions of the managers of the shipyard, with Douglas Prothero in charge, a “concealment or disappearance of assets and rights” that could “delay, hinder or prevent the effectiveness of an embargo”.
The magistrate Amelia María Pérez Mosteiro, therefore, ordered the file of the proceedings. There is no recourse against your car.
Related news
“We must point out that there have been no signs of evidence of fraud or gross negligence in his conduct that could have caused or aggravated the state of insolvency”, pointed out the bankruptcy administration, exercised by Tahice Legal, in the aforementioned report. That Ritz-Carlton, for example, changed hands of the ship Evrima so as not to be without him in the case -later materialized- of insolvency was not a sufficient argument for responsibilities to be derived.
The allegations (the only ones made) by the legal representation of some thirty UGT workers have been useless, pointing out the “priority” that, under the presidency of Douglas A. Prothero, was given to the Evrima cruise ship. “In the same scenario –defends the squad, subjected to an extinct ERE– it is decided that the ship is sent to a shipyard in Santander. The boat leaves under the pretext of painting it, but the fact is that he never returns to Barreras’ workshops. What’s more, “warehouse stocks are sent to Santander”, without any payment in return. However, for judicial managers there has been no “concealment of assets”.