Former Deputy Attorney General Raz Nazri has called for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s trial to end with a plea agreement, stating that it is time to put an end to the “travesty.” In an interview with “The Central Edition,” Nazri expressed his views on the ongoing trial and the recent petition against Netanyahu’s position as Prime Minister.
The High Court of Justice is set to hear a petition calling for Netanyahu’s disqualification due to a violation of his conflict of interest settlement. Nazri, however, believes that it is not the court’s role to determine the Prime Minister and that such a decision would be dangerous for democracy.
Regarding the expanded panel discussing the petition against Netanyahu, Nazri emphasized that it does not imply acceptance of the petition. He warned against both the left and the right using legal tools to engineer political systems, stating that it is important to respect the law and not manipulate it for political gain.
Nazri also touched upon the importance of a dialogue between Netanyahu and Ombudsman Gali Beharev Miara regarding the conflict of interest settlement. He stressed the significance of upholding the law and finding common ground on this major issue with economic, social, and security implications.
In relation to the bill to reduce probable cause, Nazri expressed his disagreement, stating that while changes should be made to the system, extreme solutions proposed by the coalition could lead to further complications. He used the analogy of bringing a goat into a house, which eventually leaves behind a mess that is difficult to restore.
Nazri also commented on the concept of reasonableness in decision-making, stating that it should be reduced in certain cases, such as government decisions and appointments. However, it should not be applicable to every decision made by a minister, as it could undermine the authority of other officials.
Regarding recent discourse against jurists, Nazri called for harmony and dialogue, rather than firing or threatening those involved. He highlighted the need to recognize the work of dedicated jurists in the Ministry of Justice and differentiate them from any shortcomings that need to be addressed without destroying the legal system.
When questioned about the possibility of Netanyahu entering into a plea deal, Nazri stated that certain cases should be filed while others should not, taking into account the interests of both the prosecution and the defense. He also touched upon the judges’ decision to cancel the bribery section in Case 4000 and emphasized the importance of balanced positions.
Nazri concluded by warning against one-sided victories, saying that it would be a loss for the country. He urged for a united approach and respect for democratic principles, considering the ongoing protests and polarization in Israeli society.
Overall, Nazri’s interview sheds light on his perspective regarding Netanyahu’s trial, the role of the courts in determining political positions, and the need for dialogue and balance in decision-making.