2023-08-18 21:41:33
Prenatal Screening and the Emotional Impact: A Personal Perspective
Sanne van der Hout, now an assistant professor of biomedical ethics at Maastricht University, shares her personal experience with prenatal screening and the emotional toll it can take. Her story sheds light on the complex decisions and considerations that individuals face when offered the possibility of excluding certain disorders through prenatal testing.
Van der Hout first delved into the topic during her master’s degree in applied ethics as she explored research into chromosomal and structural congenital abnormalities during pregnancy. At the time, it was primarily an academic exercise for her. She had no personal understanding of the emotional weight that these screenings and their consequences could carry.
Fast forward to age 29, when Van der Hout became pregnant with her second child. She opted to take a combination test at twelve weeks of pregnancy, the predecessor of the Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) currently offered free of charge. This blood test aimed to detect indications of Down’s, Edwards’, or Patau’s syndrome, with a higher-than-usual 1 in 20 chance of Down syndrome for her age group.
The news overwhelmed her. Van der Hout admitted that she hadn’t fully considered the potential outcomes and what she would do if the results indicated her child had Down syndrome. It was a conversation she had to have with her partner for the first time. Initially, their opinions differed, with her friend being more inclined towards termination. Van der Hout felt conflicted, feeling as though her options were limited since the baby was already on the way.
What made the situation especially difficult for Van der Hout was the uncertainty surrounding the quality of life for a child with Down syndrome. While some children require institutionalization due to aggression and restlessness, others can attend regular schools with additional support and lead relatively normal lives. This uncertainty further muddied the decision-making process.
Ultimately, the couple decided, on the evening before the puncture, to not draw any consequences from the screening result. Regardless of the outcome, they had prepared a cradle for their baby, affectionately referred to as “Plukje,” as described in Van der Hout’s book, “Unexpected. When prenatal screening leads to impossible choices.”
Van der Hout’s personal experience highlights the complexities and emotional struggles that individuals face when confronted with prenatal screening and the potential outcomes. The decisions are rarely straightforward and involve a multitude of factors, from personal beliefs to societal pressures. As advancements in prenatal screening continue, it becomes increasingly crucial to provide support and information to individuals facing these difficult decisions.]
#attention #paid #consequences #medical #screening #decisions #carry #lifetime