Title: Former Comrades of David Amsalem Break Silence to Address Slanderous Claims
Subtitle: MP Gadi Neuman and Majd Eil Peled Speak Out Against Amsalem’s Accusations
Date: [Insert Date]
David Amsalem, a former commander in an armored company, is facing scrutiny from his former comrades and friends as they refute the defamatory statements he has made about their relationship. In a surprising turn of events, both MP Gadi Neuman and Majd Eil Peled, who had previously declined interviews, have decided to break their silence.
Neuman, a Lieutenant Colonel, boldly asserts, “You can look me in the eye – I’m the one who took my uncle Amsalem out of the battalion,” in response to Amsalem’s claims. Amsalem, on the other hand, challenges Neuman’s appointment as an MP, stating, “I’d love to know in which year Mr. Neuman was appointed MP.”
Initially, Neuman had been reluctant to give interviews, believing the story did not warrant attention. However, when Amsalem mentioned his name publicly, insinuating a conspiracy against him, Neuman felt compelled to address the issue. Peled echoes Neuman’s sentiments, stating, “The only reason I’m appearing here today is to say once and for all – yes, he was kicked out of the battalion and I’m the one who kicked him out.”
Further investigations shed light on a specific incident during their time in Jenin. Amsalem had been driving a jeep without a proper license, and when the jeep got stuck in a Palestinian village, he asked his fellow soldiers to lie on his behalf. Neuman, who had served as the MP in Jenin, recalls the investigation process, where the truth eventually unraveled.
When Amsalem and the MP accompanying him on the jeep heard about the investigation, they immediately left the base and refused to cooperate. Neuman explains, “Call Amsalem home and he doesn’t answer. We conducted the investigation without them, but it was clear that he no longer remained in the company.”
Moreover, a letter emerged that confirmed the expulsion of Amsalem from the battalion. Neuman discovered the document among his reserves, which outlined the events leading to Amsalem’s removal. Amsalem attempted to discredit the letter, claiming it was fabricated. However, Neuman challenges him, stating, “Amsalam, you had three ‘feats,’ I was the third.”
In response to Amsalem’s recent interview where he labeled their company as divided, Neuman vehemently denies such claims. He highlights the diverse backgrounds of the soldiers involved and emphasizes their unity during the rescue mission in question.
As the controversy surrounding Amsalem continues to unfold, it becomes increasingly evident that his former colleagues are determined to set the record straight and ensure the truth prevails.