Manchester United’s decision to abandon their plan for Mason Greenwood’s return to the club has been supported by former United captain Gary Neville. However, Neville criticized the process leading up to the decision, describing it as “pretty horrible” and lacking leadership.
The club announced on Wednesday that Greenwood would not be returning to the first team following a public backlash. This decision comes after it was reported by The Athletic last week that United’s chief executive, Richard Arnold, had informed the club’s executive leadership in August of the plan for Greenwood to return.
Neville, now a pundit, expressed his agreement with the decision, stating, “It was clear from day one that he wouldn’t play for Manchester United again.” However, he criticized the club for their handling of the situation, particularly in regards to issues of domestic abuse and violence against women.
Neville believes that such significant issues should be dealt with independently by a panel, rather than Manchester United acting as “judge and jury.” He suggests that the club lacks strong authoritative leadership and that the situation has been mishandled.
Greenwood had been subjected to an internal investigation by United since February, when the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service discontinued its case against him for attempted rape, assault, and coercive control. The CPS stated that there was no longer a realistic prospect of conviction after key witnesses withdrew their cooperation. Greenwood maintains his innocence but admits to making mistakes.
Neville’s sentiments were echoed by former England international Karen Carney, who criticized the way the situation has been handled. She referred to confusing and conflicting statements, leaks, and unnecessary involvement of stakeholders, particularly female players.
Overall, the decision by Manchester United to abandon Greenwood’s return has been deemed correct by Neville. However, there is significant criticism surrounding the club’s handling of the situation, particularly in relation to issues of domestic abuse and the involvement of an independent panel.