Title: Finding Alternatives to Colonoscopies and Hearing Aids: Advice from Dr. Roach
Subtitle: Annual Stool Samples and Surgical Solutions Discussed
Date: [Current Date]
In the latest edition of his advice column, Dr. Roach addresses two common health concerns: colonoscopies and hearing loss. He offers insights into alternative options and weighs the pros and cons of each approach.
Colon cancer screening is a crucial step in maintaining good health, especially for older individuals. However, the uncomfortable nature of colonoscopies can deter many people from getting screened regularly. In response to a reader’s query about the recommended frequency of colonoscopies, Dr. Roach explains that while guidelines differ, most authorities advise against screening after the age of 75 or 85 for average-risk individuals.
One reader, an 80-year-old male in excellent health, shares his experience of getting burned out on colonoscopies and asks if annual stool samples could be a viable alternative. Dr. Roach confirms that stool samples, which can test for blood or colon cancer DNA, are a reasonable substitute. However, he cautions that while combination tests such as Cologuard offer better accuracy than standard fecal occult blood cards, they are still not as effective as colonoscopies.
The article emphasizes that individuals with a history of colon cancer or other high-risk factors may require continued screening and should consult their healthcare providers for personalized recommendations.
In the second part of the column, Dr. Roach dives into the topic of hearing loss and the potential alternatives to hearing aids. A reader expresses concern about the high cost of hearing aids and wonders if surgical solutions could be more cost-effective. Dr. Roach acknowledges that surgical options exist but highlights the importance of considering the specific cause of hearing loss.
For individuals with nerve damage-related hearing loss, cochlear implants are a safe and effective surgical intervention. However, they come with a hefty price tag, ranging from $50,000 to $100,000. Dr. Roach advises against cochlear implants for those who have had positive results with hearing aids, as complications can occur.
For individuals with conductive hearing loss, bone-anchored hearing aids offer an alternative to traditional hearing aids. Dr. Roach explains that while the quality of hearing may be better, the costs associated with this treatment are significant, potentially totaling between $15,000 to $25,000.
Dr. Roach concludes that while ENT doctors would be the best resource to discuss surgical options, cost-saving may not be a compelling reason to opt for surgery unless the patient has exhausted all other avenues.
Readers are reminded that Dr. Roach is unable to respond to individual letters but aims to address common concerns in his column. Questions can be emailed to [email protected] or sent via mail.
© 2022 North America Syndicate Inc. All Rights Reserved.