Raden anti-lag (non plus version) is it safe to use? :: Spanish Forum

by time news

2024-01-02 07:30:05

Do 7000 series users have classic anti lag available to activate? If so, it would be a way to “confirm” that it is safe, I ask because amd has somewhat forgotten the 6000 series and below.

Antilag is available on all existing series GPUs since AMD antilag existed, whether old or new.
It’s not that I have forgotten the previous series, it’s simply that they are already obsolete today, especially with the technological leap that current GPUs made, which is quite large.
Calculate that the series are from the following years:
The RX 5000 series was launched in 2019.
The RX 6000 series was launched in 2020.
The RX 7000 series was launched in 2023.
And for graphics/GPU issues there is a big difference in years, and that was noticeable as I say in the jump that the current ones made, both from AMD and Nvidia, in any case I don’t think that AMD has forgotten the old GPUs, since For some reason, its new FSR 3.0+FMF technologies make a 60 FPS game run up to 150FPS or more depending on the game. Although they were developed for the current series, the 7000, they are compatible with previous series, they are even compatible with Intel and Nvidia GPUs that Nvidia itself does not support DLSS, but it does with AMD’s FSR, so I don’t think it applies to say that AMD has forgotten the previous generations, it would apply to Nvidia that directly DLSS 3.0 is only for the 4000 series, if you have the previous generation, settle for what’s left (someone tells me “RTX 3000 does support DLSS 3.0” and “yes and no” it only supports half, let’s say, since what makes DLSS 3.0 useful is not It supports, in short, the RTX 3000 are compatible with DLSS 3.0, yes, but only in “Super Resolution” mode. The “Frame Generation” mode is exclusive to the RTX 4000, and this is the mode that interests 90% of players.
Therefore, AMD in this regard does think about its users and provides much more support than Nvidia to previous generations.

Although to clarify it is not a matter of fanaticism or hatred of one brand or the other, I use both and both are excellent, there is simply the reality, and that is that current technologies are not all compatible with old/previous hardware, so even if you want It is not possible to give all the benefits of a current GPU to a previous one, that is why I emphasize that AMD does do so for the moment since its GPUs support current technology.

Added to all this is that, taking out South America where everything is extremely “expensive”, in the rest of the world (serious countries) GPUs up to mid-range are accessible/cheap, therefore it is normal that, for example, someone who has an RX 6800 XT or a 3070 TI/3080 TI, with 1 year of use, you simply change it for a RX 7800 XT or a current 4070/4070 TI without it being something that affects your life or your pocket as they say.
This for South America in general, let’s say that it is not so easy, but it is a reality that like everything that exists in this world, everything new is based on new technologies, which is why AMD continues to support not only 1 but also 2 previous generations with current technologies is more than admirable, since the simplest thing is to only provide support/improvements to the current generation, so that more people want a new GPU.

And yes, as I mentioned about antilag, it is totally safe, since although for the normal user the difference between “antilag” and “antilag+” is only the “+”, the reality is that at the level of development and technology itself, they are functions that fulfill the same objective but in a totally different way, that’s why one has been used for many years, that is, the antilag and nothing ever happened, and the other, shortly after coming out, had the famous problem of global bans.

#Raden #antilag #version #safe #Spanish #Forum

You may also like

Leave a Comment