Op-Ed: The Pistorius Parole — A Tale of Pity as Social Currency
Oscar Pistorius, the South African double-amputee former Olympic sprinter, has been released on parole after serving nine years for the murder of 29-year-old paralegal and model, Reeva Steenkamp. The circumstances of his release, combined with the portrayal of him as a “broken man” in the media, have sparked outrage and raised questions about the focus on his redemption rather than the justice for the victim.
Pistorius’s release into his wealthy uncle’s care at a luxurious compound with strict parole conditions has drawn criticism for the portrayal of him as a victim, particularly in comparison to the loss suffered by Steenkamp and her family. The emphasis on his supposed suffering and isolation following his release has been labeled as a form of brand rebuilding and compassion-washing, aimed at preparing for his public re-entry in 2030.
The focus on Pistorius’s hardships and potential redemption has led to concerns that the narrative is sidelining the victim, with Steenkamp’s story being overshadowed by the portrayal of Pistorius as a remorseful and reformed individual. The portrayal of Pistorius as a broken and remorseful man has sparked controversy and raised questions about the fairness of the justice system and the treatment of victims of gender-based violence.
As Pistorius embarks on his parole, the public is urged to remember the true victim in this case: Reeva Steenkamp, whose life was tragically cut short. The focus should be on justice for the victim and not on pity as a powerful social currency.
Barbara Ellen is an Observer columnist.
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a letter of up to 250 words to be considered for publication, email it to us at [email protected]