“Lead Prosecutor in Trump Case Accused of Filing for Divorce After Alleged Affair with Fulton County DA”

by tyme cy

Lead Prosecutor in Trump Case Accused of Filing for Divorce After Alleged Affair with Fulton County DA

In a shocking turn of events, Nathan Wade, the lead prosecutor in the Georgia election fraud case against former President Donald Trump, has been accused of filing for divorce from his ex-wife just one day after being hired by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. The allegations suggest that Wade had an affair with Willis, his alleged paramour, leading to the dissolution of his marriage.

According to court documents filed on Friday, Wade moved swiftly to have records related to the divorce sealed by the court handling the proceedings. This move raises suspicions about the nature of their relationship and further fuels speculation surrounding their involvement in the Trump case.

The filing by Joycelyn Wade, Nathan’s ex-wife, reveals that he was appointed as a special prosecutor by Ms. Willis on November 1, 2021, and he filed for divorce on November 2, 2021. Joycelyn was served with divorce papers on November 3, 2021. This timeline suggests a hasty decision on Nathan’s part and raises questions about the ethics of his appointment as lead prosecutor.

Notably, Joycelyn’s filing also includes bank records detailing Nathan’s extravagant travel expenses, which allegedly include trips with Willis funded by the legal fees he received from the Fulton County DA’s Office. These revelations have prompted co-defendant Michael Roman, who is facing charges in the Trump case, to argue for the dismissal of criminal charges against him due to the improper relationship between Wade and Willis.

However, it is not just Wade who is under scrutiny. Willis herself has faced allegations of impropriety in hiring Wade, who is said to lack the necessary qualifications and experience to handle criminal matters. This raises concerns about the integrity of the Trump case and whether it has been compromised by personal relationships rather than legal expertise.

Joycelyn Wade claims that her ex-husband never disclosed his involvement in the Trump case or the extent of his financial gains from it. She asserts that she was left with limited financial support while Nathan indulged in lavish trips to California, Florida, and the Caribbean with Willis. These claims shed light on the potential misuse of funds and the questionable ethics surrounding their actions.

As the legal battle unfolds, both sides are fiercely contesting the allegations. Willis’ legal team has filed a motion to prevent her from sitting for a deposition in the Wade divorce case, arguing that she has no relevant testimony to offer. They also claim that the Wades’ marriage was already over before Willis met Nathan in 2017 due to Joycelyn’s alleged infidelity.

In response, Joycelyn’s attorney, Andrea Dyer Hastings, argues that Willis’ claims are false and that her client only had limited contact with an old friend through social media. Hastings emphasizes that the couple successfully worked through their issues, as evidenced by the fact that Nathan filed for divorce four years later.

Amidst the legal drama, the Fulton County Board of Commissioners has launched an investigation into whether Willis misused county funds and accepted valuable gifts and personal benefits from Wade. This investigation adds another layer of complexity to an already contentious situation.

The implications of these allegations extend beyond the personal lives of the individuals involved. They raise concerns about the integrity of the justice system and the potential influence of personal relationships on legal proceedings. The public deserves transparency and accountability from those entrusted with upholding the law.

As this scandal continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining ethical standards in the legal profession. The outcome of the Trump case hangs in the balance, and its credibility may be called into question due to these revelations. It is crucial for the truth to prevail and for justice to be served without any compromise.

You may also like

Leave a Comment