2024-05-08 12:48:36
Again, David Faitelson entered the controversy and this time made known his feelings regarding the comparison that some aficionados have done between Canelo Álvarez and Julio César Chávez.
On Saturday, May 4, Canelo Álvarez got into the ring again and faced Jaime Munguia. The final result was victory by unanimous decision for Canelo, which is why comparisons began to arise between his career and what was previously done by Julio César Chávez. This situation made David Faitelson express himself in his social networks.
Over the years, the relationship between Canelo Álvarez and David Faitelson has become increasingly more tense. The sports journalist on multiple occasions has made known his opinion regarding the rivals that Canelo has faced throughout his career, so for Faitelson there is no point of comparison between Chávez and Canelo.
In recent days, the version has emerged that David Faitelson’s constant criticism of Canelo Álvarez would have caused the Mexican boxer to veteran to the commentator of his most recent fight, making Faitelson broadcast from an improvised set near the T-Mobile Arena.
What did David Faitelson say?
In a comment that generated a stir on social networks, the sports journalist David Faitelson shared his opinion on a controversial comparison between Julio Cesar Chavez and the Canelo Alvarez.
Through its official count on the platform X, David Faitelson expressed his disapproval at the idea of comparing two Mexican boxing figures: Julio César Chávez and Saúl Canelo Álvarez. With a forceful phrase, Faitelson described the comparison as a “bad taste joke”urging fans to refrain from doing so.
This statement sparked a series of debates among boxing fans and followers of both boxers, who shared their views on the subject on social networks.
How did fans react to David Faitelson’s comment?
The declaration of David Faitelson provoked varied reactions in the social networkswith many fans debating the validity of the comparison between Canelo Alvarez y Julio Cesar Chavez and the opinion of the commentator.
Given David Faitelson’s publication, some users argued that each boxer has its own legacy and style, and comparing them would be unfair given their different era and context in the sport.
On the other hand, there were those who defended the relevance and impact of both Chávez and Canelo in the history of the mexican boxing. These users pointed out the similarities in his career and achievements, as well as his contribution to the prestige of national and international boxing.
2024-05-08 12:48:36