2024-05-19 17:15:31
The defendant’s lawyer submitted a contract of voluntary exercise to the Vilnius metropolis district courtroom listening to the felony case and assures that through the occasions talked about within the case, A. Kandrotas was a correspondent and offered companies to on-line Vilnius tv.
Its chief, Zenon Andrulėnas, who beforehand tried to run for the nation’s president, informed Eltai that the voluntary exercise contract with A. Kandrots was signed in 2023. October 19 The contract was supposed for the voluntary exercise of the correspondent.
“Since Antanas Kandrotas is at present serving his sentence in a jail, the aforementioned contract with Antanas Kandrotas will probably be terminated within the close to future,” Z. Andrulėnas informed Elta.
A brand new case in opposition to A. Kandrots was began in 2023. in November, when the accused A. Kandrotas approached the witness, police officer Vaidas Maziliauskas, after the riots on the Vilnius metropolis district courtroom close to the Seimas case courtroom listening to.
In accordance with the case information, whereas stopping the officer from happening the steps within the courtroom constructing, he filmed him with a cell phone, commented that he allegedly gave false testimony in courtroom, and harassed the witness. The prosecutor’s workplace believes that A. Kandrotas acted on this manner so as to keep away from accountability within the case of riots, the place he has been charged and is being tried along with different defendants.
Legislation enforcement assessed this as a potential try to affect the police officer to present favorable testimony to A. Kandrots and the opposite defendants, because the policeman’s interrogation didn’t finish that day – he needed to testify on the subsequent listening to. The video in regards to the persecuted policeman was additionally revealed on social networks.
“What an absurdity continues, an absurd case – you method an individual, you ask him within the fashion of KK2 (LNK’s leisure and knowledge program KK2 – ELTA) why he testified and lied, the prosecutor explains that this isn’t potential (..). I used to be not allowed to see the president once more, and I might have gained the presidential election anyway, as a result of, as I understood, these whom I had requested to not vote and the way many individuals didn’t come to vote, I might have collected essentially the most votes, as a result of the absentees obtained extra votes than Gitanas Nausėda received, that’s the second I might have entered the spherical,” stated A. Kandrots, who was delivered to the courtroom in handcuffs by a convoy.
“Both get the drink or take away {the handcuffs},” Cellophane demanded of the convoy officer as he reached for a bottle of water from his backpack. The officers have been reluctant to handcuff A. Kandrots whereas he attended the courtroom listening to.
“I do not admit it, I did not do something unsuitable. After the assembly, as a media consultant, I hurried to interview Maziliauskas as a result of I did not wish to await him on the police station. Within the fashion of KK2, I needed to interview, direct questions, I approached extra politely, and he ran away like some Siaurusevičius (former common supervisor of LRT, Audrius Siaurusevičius, probably drunk and entered {the electrical} panel – ELTA), they caught him drunk, like some drunken official. I needed to ask why he lied when testifying and didn’t tie the tie”, stated A. Kandrots whereas testifying to the courtroom. He complained that 70 % of the panel of judges inspecting the riot case. He avoids the questions he asks, so he tried to search out out the reality on this manner.
A. Kandrotas stated that he solely needed to ask V. Maziliauskas why he lied, however he was blocked, and the VST official tried to push him. In accordance with A. Kandrot, folks informed him that it was V. Maziliauskas who threw stones through the riots, and never the individuals within the riot case who are actually on trial.
At the moment, V. Maziliauskas, a police officer of the Vilnius County Chief Police Commissariat, stated that after the interrogation within the riots case and after leaving the assembly corridor, A. Kandrotas approached and, stopping him from asking questions, requested a query.
“They stated I used to be a liar, requested folks to ship details about me, there have been many various epithets and mocking remarks, I used to be known as a liar and a operating cockroach, a story was created, psychological stress was utilized earlier than the following survey. The knowledge was revealed on social networks, I noticed it myself and my family members noticed it, it was influenced earlier than the following survey. I wrote an announcement, and every week later, when the interrogation passed off, the courtroom organized for the victims to enter the courtroom, as a result of the sensation of insecurity was overcome when there are hostile folks within the corridors and on the steps,” policeman V. Maziliauskas informed the courtroom.
He stated that he was appointed to the dialogue group through the occasions on the Seimas, he works as a group officer on the third Police Commissariat of the town of Vilnius, and he knowledgeable the Police Immunity Board in regards to the slanderous data being unfold about him.
V. Maziliauskas said that he gave truthful testimony within the riots case.
In accordance with the policeman, whereas he was testifying within the riot case, the defendants have been shouting and whispering.
“I wanted time to relax as a result of I skilled stress and pressure,” admitted the police officer.
ELTA reminds that final November 2021 The Vilnius Metropolis District Court docket listening to the case of the riots close to the Seimas questioned officer V. Maziliauskas because the sufferer.
V. Maziliauskas, who labored within the Dialog group, informed the courtroom that after the riots, his picture was shared on social networks, and it was indicated that he was allegedly a provocateur. On account of these actions, the officer desires to say 3 thousand. EUR non-pecuniary harm.
V. Maziliauskas, consultant of “Dialogo group”, stated that in 2021 August 10 the opposite day he and his colleagues have been invited to the Seimas, he stated that he helped the officers keep public order. The officer stated he was carrying civilian garments, carrying an armband with the inscription “Dialogue Group”. V. Maziliauskas claimed that when speaking with folks, so as to calm them down, he repeatedly confirmed his police officer’s certificates.
Police officer V. Maziliauskas was granted sufferer standing within the riot case. He claimed that he was harmed by way of his picture with out permission, for potential defamation. The witness famous that he observed that folks typically filmed and photographed him through the rally close to the Seimas.
“I suffered because of the publication of my photograph with varied posts, attachments, calls by means of social networks, slandering that I threw stones, that I provoked conflicts. It was very extensively publicized and slandered,” V. Maziliauskas informed the courtroom.
In accordance with him, after the publication of his photographs on social networks and different channels, he obtained many questions from his minor youngsters, family members, and acquaintances.
“A story was created that I’m a provocateur, a rioter. Details about my place of residence was requested on varied channels,” defined V. Maziliauskas.
He stated that he goals to say 3 thousand within the case. EUR non-pecuniary harm. The officer famous that he felt burdened and suffered from insomnia on account of his revealed photographs.
V. Maziliauskas stated that he obtained many messages on the Web with accusations that he had induced, provoked riots, with insults. Additionally, as the person taught, he felt insecure when he noticed that social networks supplied a reward for revealing his whereabouts.
“I did not really feel very secure for a sure time frame due to the place of residence of my household, minor youngsters,” stated the sufferer.
A. Kandrots filmed the sufferer after the courtroom session, interviewed him, commenting that he gave false testimony and urged his followers to ship him materials the place this policeman is allegedly untied.
“They demand 3 thousand euros from the lamp,” commented A. Kandrotas within the put up.
The person had introduced that he would participate on this yr’s presidential elections, however the Supreme Election Fee had already twice refused to register him for the presidential election marketing campaign, as a result of the individual couldn’t open a checking account for the elections.
A. Kandrotas additionally introduced that he had created the Mes Lietuva social gathering together with his comrades, however he didn’t submit the paperwork of the founding conference in time, so the Ministry of Justice determined that the social gathering couldn’t be registered.
2024-05-19 17:15:31