2024-05-22 01:40:59
“Michael Schumacher: The primary interview” was the headline of “Die Aktuelle” 12 months in the past. The content material appeared totally different. A deception that now has penalties.
On December 29, 2013, Michael Schumacher fell whereas snowboarding and sustained severe accidents. Since then, he has not appeared in public. Nearly nothing is thought concerning the well being of the Components 1 legend, and his household can be holding personal issues below wraps.
The thrill was all of the larger when “Die Aktuelle” introduced a “world sensation” on April 15, 2023. “The primary interview” may very well be learn on the duvet of the problem subsequent to a photograph of Michael Schumacher. However the journal did not even discuss to the athlete; the content material of the dialog was created with the assistance of synthetic intelligence (AI). Consequently, the Press Council issued a reprimand for a severe violation of the truthfulness requirement – nevertheless it should not cease there.
Because the business journal “Übermedien” stories, the Funke media group, to which “Die Aktuelle” belongs, paid compensation to Michael Schumacher. This emerges from a ruling by the Munich Labor Courtroom. The quantity of the cost is alleged to have amounted to 200,000 euros. In accordance with “dwdl.de”, this sum is considerably increased than the quantities that Funke and different publishers have paid for comparable offenses up to now.
Authorized battle continues
However the Schumacher story does not simply have monetary penalties for “Die Aktuelle”. Instantly after the journal was printed, the general public outcry was so nice that the Funke media group responded with a drastic step: Anne Hoffmann, who had been editor-in-chief of the Illustrierte for 14 years, was fired with quick impact.
Nevertheless, Anna Hoffmann didn’t settle for the dismissal passively. She filed a lawsuit towards her former employer. The Munich Labor Courtroom took up the matter and initially discovered that the editor-in-chief had “severely violated her contractual obligation to take the authentic pursuits of her employer (…) into consideration” and “severely exceeded the bounds of what’s ‘nearly acceptable'”.
Nonetheless, the courtroom got here to the conclusion that the extraordinary termination was disproportionate – and justified this, amongst different issues, with Hoffmann’s earlier successes and her lengthy service with the corporate. Within the judgment obtainable to “Übermedien”, the dismissal was subsequently declared invalid. The employer ought to have checked whether or not measures aside from termination may have been thought of.
Funke has lodged an enchantment towards the decision and the authorized dispute will subsequently proceed earlier than the state labor courtroom. The writer didn’t need to touch upon whether or not Hoffmann has labored for Funke once more for the reason that verdict.