野 Controversy over the so-called unlawful dealing with of the 4th Broadcasting Act

by times news cr

2024-06-20 20:31:10

Democratic Social gathering claims “the so-called failure was as a result of boycott”
Offering greater than 10 days discover of laws additionally violates the Nationwide Meeting Act

On the nineteenth, individuals inside and out of doors the political circles, together with the ruling social gathering, continued to level out that it was a “violation of the Nationwide Meeting Act” because the Democratic Social gathering of Korea handed the ‘4 Broadcasting Acts’ independently on the normal assembly of the Science, Expertise, Info, Broadcasting and Communications Committee of the Nationwide Meeting the day gone by, with out going via the Invoice Overview Subcommittee. The invoice assessment subcommittee assessment course of specified within the Nationwide Meeting Act was omitted. The Democratic Social gathering countered by saying, “It’s not unlawful as a result of we had been unable to type the subcommittee as a result of ruling social gathering’s boycott,” however it’s anticipated that the controversy over violation of the Nationwide Meeting Act will proceed till the plenary session is processed sooner or later.

Based on Article 58, Paragraph 2 of the Nationwide Meeting Act, when reviewing an agenda merchandise, the standing committee should refer it to a subcommittee for assessment and report. Nonetheless, the day earlier than, the Nationwide Protection Committee held a normal assembly with the opposition social gathering alone and proceeded with the so-called referral, skipping it. As well as, it’s a violation of Article 82, Diploma 2 of the Nationwide Meeting Act, which states that ‘the chairman of the standing committee should seek the advice of with the secretary and provides advance discover of the legislative function and principal contents of the submitted invoice by posting it within the Nationwide Meeting bulletin or the Nationwide Meeting Web web site, and many others. (for a minimum of 10 days).’ It was additionally identified that this was executed.

The Democratic Social gathering’s place is, “Establishing a invoice subcommittee within the standing committee is elective, not obligatory, and due to this fact will not be a mandatory step.” Based on Article 57, Paragraph 1 of the Nationwide Meeting Act, ‘The committee might set up a everlasting subcommittee to share and assessment issues underneath its jurisdiction, and, if mandatory, might set up a subcommittee to assessment particular agenda objects.’ Concerning the duty to inform laws upfront, the Democratic Social gathering additionally stated, “The Nationwide Meeting Act offers exceptions to instances similar to ‘instances the place laws should be enacted urgently.’”

Rep. Kim Seung-won, the Democratic Social gathering secretary for the Laws and Judiciary Committee of the Nationwide Meeting, additionally appeared to pay attention to the controversy over illegality this morning and stated, “If there’s (adequate) dialogue on the contents of the invoice within the Legislative and Judiciary Committee, procedural flaws (within the extreme protection) may be cured.” Nonetheless, in a telephone name this afternoon, Rep. Kim stated, “If the subcommittee itself was not shaped out of extreme protection, there is no such thing as a procedural defect and there’s nothing to treatment.”


Reporter Ahn Gyu-young [email protected]

Scorching information now

2024-06-20 20:31:10

You may also like

Leave a Comment