India has once again ignored a resolution against Russia in the UN Security Council. However, what India is going to do and what the nations of the world are going to talk about in the debate to be held at the United Nations General Assembly tonight according to Indian time is subject to anticipation.
The Security Council requested that in addition to the International Atomic Energy Agency’s ongoing inspections in Ukraine, that it monitor Russia’s compliance with “the steps required by the IAEA Board”.
Eleven countries voted in favor in the referendum. Russia voted against. India, China and the United Arab Emirates abstained.
However, the resolution was passed with the support of 11 countries, as it could not be vetoed under UN rules.
The United Nations Security Council has a total of 15 member states. Of these, the United States, Britain, Russia, China and France have been granted veto power. These are all permanent member states.
Even if one of these countries thinks, the resolutions can be overturned. Therefore the support of these 5 countries is essential for a resolution to be passed in the United Nations Security Council. But no country has been given a veto power because the resolution is pragmatic.
Following this, the UN General Assembly is scheduled to meet tonight. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has announced that representatives from 193 countries will take part.
Speaking during the referendum, India’s Ambassador to the UN D.S. Thirumurthy noted that the escalation of violence in Ukraine since last Friday was regrettable and that the Security Council had called for talks.
He later said in a statement that there was no solution to the problem other than negotiations, and that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had stressed this to Ukrainian and Russian leaders.
What happened at the Security Council last time?
The resolution against Russia was also passed by the UN last Friday. Security was brought into them. Russia has used its veto power to overturn a United Nations Security Council resolution calling on Russian troops to withdraw from Ukraine and condemn Russia.
The resolution against Russia was supported by 11 countries, including the United States and Britain. Russia rejected. The rest of India, China and the United Arab Emirates abstained. The resolution ended in defeat as Russia opposed the resolution with veto power. So the United States then promised to take the issue to the General Assembly, where the veto power was invalid.
At the time, India’s ambassador to the United Nations, D.S. Thirumurthy released an explanatory statement on behalf of India.
The statement added that India was “deeply concerned” about the situation in Ukraine and urged India to make every effort to end the fighting.
The report stressed that all member states should keep in mind that negotiations are the only solution.
The report said it regretted the abandonment of ways to find a solution through government negotiations and to return to that path.
Ukraine has implicitly expressed its dissatisfaction with India’s position in the Security Council. Ukraine’s envoy Sergei Kislytskaya said some countries were enduring the war.
The United States also opposed India’s position. Linda, the US envoy, said that abstaining or abstaining from voting was a pro-Russian position. He also accused Russia of waging an arbitrary war.
At the same time, the Russian envoy said that the resolution was against Russia, adding that it was also against Ukraine.
Neither China nor the United Arab Emirates voted in favor of the resolution. China’s envoy Zhang Jun said Ukraine should always be a bridge between the West and the East and not a battleground for superpowers.
At the end of the meeting, Secretary – General of the United Nations, Antonia Guterres, expressed his disappointment that nothing had happened at this meeting.
India’s position on the Russian invasion
Sivashankar Menon, who was the National Security Adviser to the then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s government at the time of Russia’s annexation of Crimea in March 2014, said that “Russia has a completely legitimate interest in Crimea.”
That is, India is not opposed to Russia annexing Crimea.
Russian President Vladimir Putin thanked India for its support and said, “I would like to thank all those who supported Russia’s action in Crimea. There was no tension on the India-China border then.
In April 2020, China sought to change the ‘status quo’ of the Line of Control in eastern Ladakh.
During the operation, there was a fierce clash between the soldiers of the two countries. Tensions are still high on the border there. Also, the pre-2020 status quo has not yet been restored to the true Line of Control.
India needs the support of not only Russia but also the US and Europe when it comes to China’s occupation of the border.
Russia and Western countries are in conflict over Ukraine. In such a situation India cannot take anyone’s side. Can not be an observer either. The United States has been speaking in support of India over China’s encroachment on the Indian border. But Russia remained neutral.
What should India do?
Kanwal Sibal, who was foreign secretary and Indian ambassador to Russia during the Atal Bihari Vajpayee regime, wrote an article in the February 21 issue of India Narrative on India’s position on the Russia-Ukraine crisis.
It said, “India has good relations with the United States, Europe and Russia. We should not take any side in such a situation. We need a more prudent foreign policy now. Both sides are looking at who India is going with. The United States wants India to support itself. But India must make an independent decision.”
Russia believes it should not come under US pressure. Any military conflict is not good for India because it will have serious international consequences. “
“India’s military deal will be affected by Western sanctions on Russia. India, on the other hand, plans to invest in Russia’s hydrocarbon sector.
But now the United States may consider it. Not only will the rise in crude oil prices affect the Indian economy. Our economy is just beginning to recover from the recession of the Govt epidemic, ”he said.