The new integration of the Chamber of Deputieswith a qualified majority of the Fourth Transformation (4T), disregarded the court order that prevented the legislative process of judicial reform from starting and threatened to promote impeachments against the judges which issued the provisional suspensions.
The courts Fifth and Third of Morelos and Chiapas, respectively, granted provisional suspensions, with different scopes, but which ordered to stop the discussion of the constitutional changes, which include the election of judges by popular vote.
Last Saturday, Martha Magaña, federal judge of Morelos, issued the resolution for the “reform opinion Constitutional in judicial matters approved by the Constitutional Affairs Committee is not subject to discussion or voting by the Chamber of Deputies of the Congress of the Union, much less, if it were the caseit will be referred to the Executive for sanction (at which time it may exercise its right of veto) and promulgated.”
However, Morena and its allies started their deliberative process yesterday and threatened with a political trial, criminal complaint and complaint to the Judiciary against the judges who issued the provisional suspensions and acted under protestsince they remain on strike.
The Chamber of Deputies yesterday publicized the judicial reform and announced that next Tuesday the opinion will be submitted to the Plenary, thereby disregarding the judicial order that states that the 24 hours to report the actions so that the ruling is no longer discusseda deadline that expired yesterday.
At the same time that the deadline for legislators to inform the Judiciary that they would abide by the resolution expired, a fraction of deputies of the Fourth Transformation announced that they would seek impeachment and criminal charges against Martha Magaña and Felipe Consuelo Soto, who issued the suspensions.
José Perdomo, an expert from the La Salle Faculty of Law, pointed out 24 HOURS that the Chamber of Deputies is obliged to abide by the judicial order and that a failure to comply would impact the State of Law and would cause disarray in the Mexican political system.
In contrast, Eduardo Andrade, former general counsel of UNAM, He wrote on his X account that there is an inadmissibility of the appeal against constitutional reforms and described the provisional suspension ordered by two judges as a “legal monstrosity.”
Counterattack
Ricardo Monreal, leader of the Morena faction in the Chamber of Deputies, who together with the PVEM and PT The qualified majority yesterday said that the judicial reform would be approved on Wednesday, which will coincide with the incidental hearing to verify whether the definitive suspension against these changes is approved.
The deputy explained, after holding the first meeting of the Political Coordination Board (Jucopo), The ruling coalition considers that the actions of the judges are a clear interference, a violation of the Constitution. and they have no jurisdiction in this regard.
“There was even talk of taking legal action. Three actions against the judges for their serious interference in the internal life of the Legislative Branch, impeachment was proposed, criminal charges were filed for crimes committed in the administration of justice and a complaint was filed before the Judiciary.
“That was raised, I will say it with all honesty, by Sergio Gutiérrez Luna, who was invited by us to the Board of Directors. Political Coordination. This was not agreed upon, I asked for it to be withdrawn in order to analyze the three actions in greater depth, but they are up in the air in the majority group, although it was not agreed upon, obviously, and since it was not agreed upon, it was not voted on either,” he indicated.
Other deputies expressed a more conservative stance on the issue: “It is giving them too much importance, what I am asking today, in a point of agreement, is that they be given a warning so that they adjust to respect for the “Amparo Law”declared Morena member Dolores Padierna.
The deputy of Morena, Peter You do, He considered it necessary to wait “the alphabet starts with A and ends with Z, so you have to go slowly.”
Meanwhile, the coordinator of the PAN deputies, Noemí Luna, described it as “an outrage that we are in a moment in Mexico where exercising the law means danger,” a position that was echoed by PAN senator Ricardo Anaya, who said that initiating a political trial against the judges was “an absurdity.”
Report Delivery AMLO will not send preferential initiatives
The Secretary of the Interior, Luisa María Alcalde, announced when delivering the Sixth Government Report, that the president Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador will not use its power to send “preferential initiatives” at the start of the first ordinary period of the LXVI Legislature.
In a speech more in a partisan tone than institutional as a representative of the Executive Branch, Alcalde explained that this power was rejected by the president because “as you know, this chamber already has the initiatives of reforms to the Constitution that were approved.”
“It is up to you to make the final decision and decide what will happen, you will continue to make history.” /Jorge X. López
Related
2024-09-03 07:42:26