Conscience in the Court, the case of Florent Madelaine, the firefighter was suspended and then dismissed for denying mandatory immunity.

by time news

2024-09-23 10:00:00

“Don’t do anything against your conscience, even if the state asks you to.” – Albert Einstein

In 2021, with the mandatory COVID 19 vaccination imposed on certain professions, conscientious objection has also appeared.

Therefore, the question arises as to what extent it is right to judge people because of their refusal to participate in an action that is not compatible with moral or religious beliefs?

According to lawyer Grégor Puppinck, an expert in the case: ” an objection exists when the conviction of the objector is sufficiently firm to require him to refuse to perform the act prescribed. There is real opposition when the person who opposes is not ready to sacrifice himself in order to continue being faithful to what his conscience says. So this does not involve simple personal opinions which can be changed ».

Case of Florent Madelaine – Hearing at the Administrative Court of Rouen on September 20, 2024

Florent Madelaine has been a firefighter at SDIS 76 in Seine-Maritime for more than twenty years, whose motto is ” courage and dedication “. Wife and father, man of honor, Florent Madelaine refused the experimental vaccination against covid, despite the vaccination obligation imposed on his work (1) following the announcement of the Head of State on July 12, 2021, which led to your delay.

With his family, he planned to leave France, but this proved impossible. Faced with economic instability and the need to provide for his family’s needs, but unable to bring himself to be vaccinated, Florent Madelaine will request reinstatement to SDIS 76 by presenting a false vaccination pass found on the internet.

SDIS 76 will notice this and file a case against him for possession and use of forgery, and will stop again immediately after re-installation. A disciplinary committee will convene and will decide to suspend for two years for these facts.

However, this sanction seems to be too light, SDIS 76 will decide to cancel it for life ! Very surprised by this decision, a sign of the end of his career as a firefighter for which he had a job, Florent Madelaine decided to take the case to the administrative court. He asked the court to recognize that he acted as a conscientious objector by refusing to be vaccinated against covid 19 and in an emergency by using a false passport. Furthermore, the Attorney General of Rouen, taking into account Florent Madelaine’s statements, will close the criminal complaint filed by SDIS 76 against him.

This Friday, September 20, 2024, the hearing on this procedure took place in the administrative court. To the surprise of Florent Madelaine and his lawyer, Maître Diane Protat, public reporter (2), without taking a position on the conscientious objection itself, asked the court to judge the life of Florent Madelaine null and void, because he would not have light fitting of the circumstances and to order its restoration. But, in fact, those whose conscience does not allow them to serve in the military, when they are convicted of the accusation that they were convicted of being honest and genuine, cannot be subject to any execution.

Very surprised by this unexpected situation of the general reporter, SDIS will only have fear as an argument ” of the message of restoration that Florent Madelaine will send to his companions “. A surprising, but sensible, way of protecting yourself, because in the event of a favorable decision from Florent Madelaine, this decision scheduled for October 4, 2024 can set precedent and snowball.

In this commentary, Florent Madeleine gives us an exemplary answer to these questions. He explained his journey and his journey where he accepted social decline, loss of income and everything that followed with respect for his conscience.

Remember that Novak Djokovic, who refused to receive immunity on the grounds that he did not want to put anything in his body, received money not to play the Australian Open. The choice has serious consequences, both from the media’s point of view and for other people, because it establishes basic rights at their proper level.

It should not be like that in the country of the Declaration of Human Rights, successive governments give the impression of having a recurring problem with respect for the importance of rights and the hierarchy of standards.

Annex
1) – Reminder on the implementation of mandatory vaccination and resistance

The mandate was imposed on certain professions following the announcement of the Head of State on July 12, 2021, and confirmation by the vote of the two chambers and the joint council on August 5, 2021.

These laws exist despite the fact that the group BonSens.org, and others, have demonstrated that the President’s scientific claims are unfounded, sending several letters to congressmen with real scientific data (letter on the the result of the vaccination passed July 16. , open letter from Dr Jean-François Lesgards, letter to the President of the Republic).

Therefore the vaccination obligation occurs for caregivers and workers such as firefighters for a disease that affects only the elderly or people with chronic diseases, indicating the general interest – without real evidence of the effectiveness of these therapies on damage , regardless of the potential group. effects, or with manufacturer-provided risk-benefit analyses.

All this despite international conventions and laws such as the right to dispose of oneself freely or the right to have freedom and informed consent, explained even before the legislators by Dr. Umlil who will also be suspended. Suspended from performing his duties while the media (for example, Dr. Milhau, among many others), contributes to disinformation and violation of this order. We also remember that President Macron has the intention to “upset” those who are not vaccinated and that his Minister of Health is ready to force the audience into a modern version of what the French already experienced in 1963.

2) Inside Francethem public rapporteur is a judicial member of a Administrative case or Conflict Tribunal intervene openly, independently, in the hearing to analyze the dispute and propose a solution.

#Conscience #Court #case #Florent #Madelaine #firefighter #suspended #dismissed #denying #mandatory #immunity

You may also like

Leave a Comment