2024-09-27 09:12:24
The Plenary Chamber of the Constitutional Court declared pets unseizable; The Attorney General’s Office supported the decision to protect the emotional health of citizens
DIARIO DEL HUILA, CURRENT EVENTS
On September 25, 2024, the Plenary Chamber of the Constitutional Court of Colombia issued a historic ruling declaring that pets are non-seizable property, which means that they cannot be seized in judicial disputes, such as in cases of divorce. This decision, which seeks to protect the emotional health of citizens, is based on a lawsuit that advocated for the inclusion of these living beings in the category of non-seizable assets, as stipulated in article 594 of Law 1564 of 2012.
A focus on animal protection
The presentation by Judge Natalia Ángel Cabo, which was approved by the Plenary Chamber during its session in Manizales (Caldas), underlines the importance of considering animals as sentient beings and not mere objects in Colombian legislation. The Court’s analysis revealed that, at the time of the issuance of the aforementioned law, Congress did not adequately provide for the protection of animal rights, which led to this crucial revision.
Support from the Attorney General’s Office
The Attorney General’s Office, which had called since February 2024 for pets to be recognized as non-seizable property, decisively supported this decision of the Court. According to the Public Ministry, separating pets from their owners to meet financial obligations could be disproportionate and have a negative impact on people’s psychological well-being. The entity emphasized that the emotional bond between humans and their pets is essential for the free development of the personality and life projects of citizens.
You can read: Attorney General’s Office files investigation against Karen Abudinen in the ‘Populated Centers’ case
Implications of the decision
This resolution represents a significant advance in the protection of animal rights in Colombia. By declaring companion animals unseizable, the Constitutional Court not only reaffirms the importance of animal welfare, but also promotes a more humanitarian and ethical vision in the relationships between human beings and their pets. This decision could set a precedent for future legislation that seeks to guarantee the respect and dignity of animals in the context of the law.
The social response and the future of animal protection
The decision of the Constitutional Court has been received with enthusiasm by animal rights organizations and civil society groups that advocate for better protection of pets in Colombia. This resolution not only validates the emotional bond that many people have with their pets, but also establishes a precedent that could inspire future legislative reforms in the country. In this sense, it is hoped that the ruling will spur a broader debate on the need to recognize animals as sentient beings, which could lead to the creation of more robust laws that guarantee their well-being and rights. As social awareness of the importance of animal welfare continues to grow, it is likely that additional mechanisms will be established to protect these vulnerable beings and ensure that their emotional and physical health is prioritized in all legal and social decisions.
The declaration of non-seizure of companion animals by the Constitutional Court of Colombia is a momentous step towards the protection of the rights of animals and the emotional well-being of their owners. This ruling reflects an evolution in the social and legal perception of animals, recognizing their importance in people’s lives and their fundamental role in the development of emotional bonds. As society moves towards greater recognition of animal rights, it is likely that more measures will be implemented to ensure their protection and well-being across the board.
You can read: New regulations for the use of pedicabs