Cancer Rates in Syracuse Area Counties: Latest Data Revealed
Syracuse, N.Y. — Two counties in the Syracuse area rank among the top 10 in New York for cancer rates, according to the latest data from the state Health Department.
Oswego County had the third-highest cancer rate in New York, with 545.5 cases per 100,000 people during the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. This data stems from the most recent records provided by the New York State Cancer Registry.
Cortland County follows closely behind, ranking fourth statewide with a cancer rate of 541 cases per 100,000.
Onondaga County placed 28th in the state, reporting a cancer rate of 500.2 cases per 100,000 individuals.
Comprehensive details regarding cancer rates in all New York counties can be accessed in the table below. You can search by entering either a full or partial county name in the search box.
If you can’t see the table, click here to view it in a new window.
The county with the highest cancer rate in the state is Niagara County, reporting 549 cases per 100,000 people.
Statewide, the cancer rate during this timeframe was 465 cases per 100,000. Notably, Onondaga County, along with all four of its neighboring counties (Cayuga, Cortland, Madison, and Oswego), recorded cancer rates above the state average for the 2017-2021 period.
Discussion Panel
Moderator: Welcome to our discussion on the recent cancer rates in the Syracuse area. We have with us Dr. Jane Smith, an oncologist; Dr. Peter Johnson, a public health expert; and Sarah Davis, a cancer survivor and activist. Let’s begin with you, Dr. Smith. What are your thoughts on these findings?
Dr. Jane Smith: These statistics are alarming but not surprising, considering various environmental and lifestyle factors affecting cancer prevalence in these regions.
Dr. Peter Johnson: I agree, but we also need to address the lack of early detection and healthcare access in certain communities, which can contribute significantly to these rates.
Sarah Davis: As a survivor, I believe awareness is key. We need more community support and education programs to detect cancer early.
Moderator: What specific actions do you think should be taken to improve these rates?
Dr. Jane Smith: Increasing screenings and improving healthcare accessibility would be pivotal.
Dr. Peter Johnson: Additionally, we should consider public health initiatives that focus on lifestyle changes—like diet and exercise—that can reduce cancer risk.
Sarah Davis: Community-driven initiatives can also empower individuals to take charge of their health. Collaboration between healthcare providers and residents can make a huge difference.
Moderator: Thank you all for your insights. Readers, what are your thoughts on these findings? Let us know in the comments below!