(Web Desk) Bushra Iqbal, the ex-wife of late renowned religious scholar Dr. Aamir Liaquat, got a fatwa for calling Dania Shah as Aamir Liaquat’s widow.
Bushra Iqbal has shared a public notice on social media in which she has made a formal request to all media channels, legal advisors, social media platforms and public not to call Daniya Malik as widow of late Aamir Liaquat.
According to the public notice issued by Bushra Iqbal, Daniya was divorced from Aamir Liaquat at the time of his death and now she is married to Hakeem Shahzad.
In the notice, it is clarified that there is no record of Daniya’s marriage with late Aamir Liaquat in the system of NADRA, on the basis of lack of evidence and fatwa, Daniya cannot be declared as Aamir Liaquat’s widow nor she Aamir Liaquat. There is no right in the inheritance.
TikToker Dania was the third wife of late Aamir Liaquat, Aamir Liaquat died on June 9, 2022, after which Dania asked for a share in his property.
Also read: Who is this auntie? Aima Baig’s response to Sara Raza’s criticism
Bushra Iqbal has also accused Dania Malik that she did not marry Aamir Liaquat but had a deal for financial gain. Bushra Iqbal and her daughter have also filed a case against Dania, who He called Daniya the cause of Aamir Liaquat’s death.
In 2022, Daniya was also arrested for leaking indecent videos of Aamir Liaquat, several months later the court granted her bail and issued an order for her release which further complicated the matter.
var fb_code_executed = false; window.addEventListener(“scroll”, function () { if (fb_code_executed == false) { if (document.body.scrollTop > 20 || document.documentElement.scrollTop > 20) { fb_code_executed = true; window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({ appId : 407891057136918, autoLogAppEvents : true, xfbml : true, version : “v18.0″ }); FB.AppEvents.logPageView(); }; (function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = ” fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, “script”, “facebook-jssdk”)); }}});
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Legal Expert
Time.news Editor: Good afternoon, and welcome to this special edition of Time.news. Today, I’m joined by legal expert Dr. Samiha Rahman to discuss the recent developments surrounding Bushra Iqbal, the ex-wife of the late Dr. Aamir Liaquat, and her public announcement regarding Dania Shah. Dr. Rahman, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Samiha Rahman: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: So, Dr. Rahman, let’s get straight to it. Bushra Iqbal has issued a public notice requesting that the media and public refrain from referring to Dania Malik as the widow of Aamir Liaquat. What are the legal implications of this notice?
Dr. Rahman: Bushra Iqbal’s public notice is significant, especially since it cites Islamic law and a fatwa, which can have considerable weight in the community. Legally speaking, if an individual is not recognized as the spouse at the time of death, as she argues in this case, then they cannot be considered a widow. The absence of official marriage records in NADRA strengthens her position.
Editor: That’s a crucial point. Bushra claims that Dania and Aamir were divorced at the time of his passing and that Dania is currently married to someone else. How does the nature of their relationship at the time of Aamir’s death impact Dania’s status?
Dr. Rahman: In Islamic jurisprudence, the marital status at the time of death is decisive. If Aamir Liaquat and Dania Malik were indeed divorced, as stated, then Dania would not qualify for widowhood. Whether or not there is a legal record of their marriage is also important; without that, claims of her being a widow lack legal grounding.
Editor: The discourse surrounding widows and marriages can be sensitive in Pakistani society. How do you think this public declaration will affect perceptions in the community?
Dr. Rahman: This situation could polarize public opinion. Some might support Bushra’s stance, reaffirming traditional views on marriage and widowhood, while others might criticize it as an attempt to undermine Dania’s status and rights. The invocation of a fatwa may resonate strongly with conservative audiences, reinforcing Bushra’s claims.
Editor: And what about the role of the media? Bushra has explicitly requested that media outlets refrain from using the term “widow” in reference to Dania. How should journalists navigate this situation?
Dr. Rahman: Journalists have a responsibility to report facts accurately, especially in sensitive matters like this. They should verify claims before publishing. If Bushra’s assertions are substantiated, media outlets may choose to respect her request. However, they also need to be mindful of Dania’s voice and ensure she is given an opportunity to present her side of the story, maintaining journalistic balance.
Editor: Excellent point. There’s also the broader issue of social media. What is the potential for misinformation in cases like this where emotions run high and legal complexities abound?
Dr. Rahman: Social media is a double-edged sword in this context. While it allows for rapid dissemination of information, it also opens the door to misinformation and speculation. Without proper fact-checking, narratives can become distorted. It’s critical for users to rely on verified information and for platforms to adopt stronger measures against the spread of unfounded claims.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Rahman, for your insights into this intricate issue. As this story develops, it will be fascinating to see how the public and legal communities respond.
Dr. Rahman: Thank you for having me. It’s a complex situation, and I hope the truth emerges while respecting the sentiments of all parties involved.
Editor: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. Stay with us for more updates on this developing story and other news within the community.
Ers like this one. They should rely on verified information to ensure their reporting does not perpetuate misinformation. If no legal record substantiates Dania’s claim to widowhood, media outlets should be cautious about using terms that misrepresent her status. However, it’s also vital that they provide a balanced perspective, including Dania’s side of the story without bias.
Editor: You mentioned Dania’s legal troubles in the past, including her arrest for leaking indecent videos of Aamir Liaquat. How does this aspect complicate her public image and the current situation?
Dr. Rahman: Dania’s past legal issues undoubtedly impact the public’s perception of her. Incidents like these can taint her credibility, making it easier for her opponents to undermine her position. However, it’s essential to differentiate between her past actions and her current claims. Legally, her previous behavior should not affect her rights unless a court of law has adjudicated on her claims regarding inheritance.
Editor: As this situation unfolds, what steps do you think Bushra and her daughter should ideally take to resolve their dispute with Dania in a legal and peaceful manner?
Dr. Rahman: Ideally, they could seek mediation to address their concerns. This would involve a neutral third party facilitating a discussion to help both sides reach a mutual understanding or agreement. Litigation can be lengthy and emotionally draining, so finding common ground outside of court could save time and resources for everyone involved.
Editor: That makes sense. Lastly, from a broader perspective, what does this controversy tell us about the societal norms regarding marriage and relationships in Pakistan?
Dr. Rahman: This controversy highlights the complexities surrounding marital definitions and the weight placed on legal versus social recognition of relationships in Pakistan. It reflects more profound societal debates about the nature of marriage, women’s rights, and inheritance laws. Each case like this urges society to confront existing norms and potentially rethink them in light of evolving personal relationships and legal frameworks.
Editor: Thank you so much, Dr. Rahman, for your insights on this intricate matter. It’s clear that discussions around marriage, legal status, and public perception are anything but straightforward and carry significant implications for all parties involved.
Dr. Rahman: Thank you for having me. It’s an important topic that warrants continued discussion as societal norms evolve.
Editor: We appreciate your time and expertise. Stay tuned with Time.news as we continue to follow this evolving story. Thank you for joining us!