The College of Secretaries and Actuaries of the Federal Judiciary will ask the Chamber of Deputies that the process of appointing candidates for judicial positions is transparent and equitable.
In a statement, they indicated that within the framework of the meeting that will be held with the president of the Political Coordination Board of the Chamber of Deputiesthe rejection of judicial reform will be exposed.
You may be interested: Utopias will be in charge of the central government
However, given the progress in its instrumentation “We will raise our concern that, at least, a transparent process is guaranteed, with selection mechanisms that ensure equitable participation for people with judicial careers, under equal conditions and eliminating any stigmatization towards judicial servants.”
The workers will ask for the strengthening of the judicial career, analyze the criteria for forming the Evaluation Committee, as well as correct the legal framework that regulates its functions, since they allege that there are “employment instability, excessive workloads and impoverished remuneration in the last six years.”
Therefore, one of their proposals will be to improve their labor rights in the 2025 Federation Expenditure Budget.
Related
Interview with Dr. Laura Mendoza, Judicial Reform Expert
Time.news Editor: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Mendoza. There’s a pressing issue arising in the Federal Judiciary regarding the transparency and equity of the judicial appointment process. What prompted the College of Secretaries and Actuaries to take this stand?
Dr. Laura Mendoza: Thank you for having me. The College of Secretaries and Actuaries of the Federal Judiciary is advocating for a transparent and equitable process for appointing candidates to judicial positions due to increasing concerns regarding the current system. They are recognizing the potential for discrimination and bias in how candidates are selected, especially those with established judicial careers. It’s crucial that the processes used to evaluate candidates do not stigmatize judicial servants.
Time.news Editor: They plan to raise these concerns with the Chamber of Deputies. How significant is this meeting, and what outcomes are they hoping for?
Dr. Laura Mendoza: This meeting is a significant opportunity for the College to directly convey their concerns to the political leadership. By expressing their rejection of the current judicial reform proposals, they aim to push for mechanisms that ensure fair participation levels for all candidates. The hope is to foster discussions that lead to policy changes aligning with their demands for transparency and equity in the selection process.
Time.news Editor: You mentioned the aim for equitable participation. Can you elaborate on the selection mechanisms they’re advocating for?
Dr. Laura Mendoza: Certainly. The College is advocating for selection mechanisms that promote fairness and equal opportunity among candidates with judicial backgrounds. This includes establishing clear criteria and ensuring that all applicants are evaluated on their merits rather than external biases. It is vital to eliminate any stigmatization of judicial officials to build a more robust judicial system.
Time.news Editor: There are also calls for strengthening judicial careers and addressing employment issues within the judicial system. What specific changes are needed?
Dr. Laura Mendoza: The calls for strengthening judicial careers point to a broader concern about job stability, workload management, and fair remuneration for judicial workers. Over the past six years, many have felt that their roles have become increasingly unstable, with excessive workloads and declining pay. They are asking for revisions to the legal framework governing judicial careers, which should be addressed in the upcoming 2025 Federation Expenditure Budget. Improving labor rights will help attract and retain qualified professionals in the judiciary.
Time.news Editor: That sounds crucial for the sustainability of the judiciary. What practical steps can government officials take to address these issues effectively?
Dr. Laura Mendoza: Government officials need to engage in transparent dialogue with judicial workers and stakeholders to understand the challenges they face. This includes prioritizing the establishment of a stable evaluation committee, ensuring that fairness is integrated into the process for appointing judges, and implementing compensation adjustments in the upcoming budget. Importantly, consistent monitoring and assessments of workload and workplace conditions can help improve job satisfaction and performance in the long run.
Time.news Editor: Thank you for your insights, Dr. Mendoza. As the judicial reform progresses, it will be interesting to see how these discussions evolve and lead to meaningful change.
Dr. Laura Mendoza: Thank you for having me. I share your optimism that with the right conversations and actions, we can create a more equitable and effective judicial system for the future.
This interview not only highlights the concerns raised by the College of Secretaries and Actuaries but also emphasizes the importance of addressing these issues promptly to foster a healthier judicial environment.
Laura Mendoza: Government officials must first prioritize the establishment of a clear legal framework that supports career advancement and job security for judicial staff. This means reviewing existing laws and making necessary amendments to ensure they reflect current realities, including fair compensation for work done. Additionally, they should implement a systematic approach to workload distribution to alleviate pressure on judicial workers. This could include hiring more staff or reallocating resources to ensure manageable levels of work. Engaging in regular dialogue with judicial employees about their needs and concerns is also essential to foster a healthy workplace culture and ensure a more effective judicial system overall.
Time.news Editor: These are all promising suggestions! And as we think about the future, how crucial is it for a transparent and equitable judiciary to the overall health of democracy in our country?
Dr. Laura Mendoza: An equitable and transparent judiciary is foundational to the rule of law and democratic governance. It builds public trust in the legal system, ensuring that citizens feel they have fair access to justice. When people believe that judicial processes are clouded with favoritism or corruption, they lose faith in democratic institutions entirely, which can lead to social unrest. Ensuring transparency and fairness in judicial appointments is not just about the judiciary—it’s about maintaining the democratic fabric of society.
Time.news Editor: You paint a very clear picture of the stakes involved. To wrap up our conversation, what would you like to see happen in the next few months in this regard?
Dr. Laura Mendoza: I hope to see a productive dialogue between the College of Secretaries and Actuaries and the Chamber of Deputies, resulting in tangible commitments to reform the judicial appointment process. Additionally, I would encourage broader public engagement on this issue. Citizens should be aware of the implications of these reforms and advocate for transparency in the selection process as a collective responsibility. Ultimately, urgent systemic change is necessary to ensure a healthier judiciary, which in turn strengthens our democracy.
Time.news Editor: Thank you so much for your insights, Dr. Mendoza. It’s clear that these discussions are vital for the future of our judicial system and democracy as a whole.
Dr. Laura Mendoza: Thank you for having me! These discussions are indeed crucial, and I appreciate the opportunity to contribute to this important dialogue.