2024-10-31 03:05:00
By Fabio Bosco
On October 26, the State of Israel bombed military installations in Iranian territory, killing two soldiers.
Zionist criminals justified the action as a response to the bombings that Iranian military forces carried out on Israeli military bases, including the headquarters of the military intelligence service, on October 1. They also said they wanted to destroy Iranian missile production facilities.
The fact is that, in addition to genocidal attacks against Palestinians and Lebanese, every day the Zionists bomb targets in Iran, Iraq, Syria and Yemen, on a smaller scale than in Gaza and Lebanon, regionalizing their military aggressions.
Who wants regionalization?
Zionist leaders are betting on regionalizing their genocidal aggressions to impose a new regional order under their command. To be successful they must involve, politically and militarily, the imperialist countries, especially the United States. Joe Biden supported large-scale genocidal actions in Lebanon and the assassination of Yahya Sinwar. But his government prefers there not be a general war against Iran before the US elections on November 5.
For opposite reasons, a part of the Palestinian population supports the regionalization of military actions against Israel, betting that new battle fronts will force the Zionists to reduce genocidal actions in Gaza and the West Bank and even accelerate the ceasefire.
Revolutionary Marxists also advocate the regionalization of military actions against Israel, and we call on the Iranian regime and the Arab regimes to do so, not only to paralyze the genocide but also to multiply the Israeli economic and social crisis and pave the way for a political and military defeat of Israel, which places a free Palestine on the horizon from the river to the sea.
The Iranian regime has promised to react, which is right and necessary. However, it seems to us that we should do much more than what has been done so far, and really commit ourselves to the fight together in Gaza against Israel.
However, the Arab regimes (Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries, Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon…) that criticize the genocide in Gaza and Lebanon, refuse to take military action against Israel and prevent the self-organization of Palestinians and their sympathizers, both to carry out peaceful protests and military actions against Israel.
The Iranian regime is no different. Its priority is political, economic and military relations with Russian and Chinese imperialism. As well as the normalization of relations with Western imperialism, to avoid the very harsh sanctions to which the country is subject. Ayatollah Khamenei has already stated that he will not attack Israel because of the Gaza genocide, but only if he is attacked. And it did so twice, in response to Israeli aggression, in April and October of this year.
Most of the Shaheed drones and Fathi missiles produced by Iran are delivered to Russian imperialism to promote genocide in Ukraine. If the Iranian regime’s priority was military support for the Palestinian resistance, every week we would have attacks with hundreds of Iranian drones and missiles against the Zionist enemy, launched from Iran and several countries in the region.
This is why we, revolutionary Marxists, defend the independent self-organization of the Palestinian resistance, together with the working class and youth of the Arab countries, to fight, by peaceful and/or military means, for the end of the genocide and the state. Zionist and for a free Palestine from the river to the sea.
International solidarity plays a key role in this fight, to prevent the sending of weapons and funds to Israel and to fight for the severing of each country’s commercial and diplomatic relations with the State of Israel.
We highlight the important role of anti-Zionist Jews in building international solidarity. Anti-Zionist Jews are growing all over the world, except in occupied Palestine, where the majority of the Jewish population is the beneficiary of the theft of Palestinian land and, therefore, supports the genocide of Palestinians and Lebanese.
More valid than ever is the slogan, abandoned by the majority of the Palestinian and Arab left, which states that the path towards the liberation of Al-Quds (Jerusalem) begins in Amman, Beirut, Cairo and Damascus.
This alliance of workers and popular forces in the region and around the world can put an end to the State of Israel and the Arab dictatorships, liberating Palestine, from the river to the sea, and ending the presence of various imperialist groups forces in the region, opening the path to an Arab Federation of Socialist Republics.
Translation: Natalia Estrada
#Israel #attacks #Iran.. #respond #genocidal #Zionism
Interviewer (Time.news Editor): Welcome to Time.news, where we delve into the pressing issues shaping our world today. Joining us is Dr. Amir Khalil, an expert in Middle Eastern politics. Thank you for being here, Dr. Khalil.
Dr. Amir Khalil: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to discuss these crucial topics.
Interviewer: Let’s dive right in. The recent Israeli bombings in Iran, which resulted in the death of two Iranian soldiers, have escalated tensions significantly. Can you provide some context on why these escalations are occurring?
Dr. Khalil: Certainly. The back-and-forth actions between Israel and Iran are rooted in a long-standing conflict fueled by ideological differences and territorial disputes. Israel claims that its recent attacks are a response to Iranian strikes on Israeli military bases, particularly targeting missile production facilities. This cycle of violence seems to be part of a larger strategy to regionalize their conflict, engaging neighboring countries and the broader international community.
Interviewer: You mentioned the involvement of other countries. The article suggests that Israel’s actions could be an attempt to draw in the United States and other imperialist powers. What are your thoughts on that?
Dr. Khalil: That’s a complex situation. Israel has historically relied on the backing of the United States for military support and political leverage. However, with the upcoming U.S. elections, the Biden administration appears cautious about a full-scale war against Iran. This reflects a desire to avoid further complications during a politically sensitive time. Meanwhile, the regional dynamics are shifting, with various countries weighing the risks and potential benefits of choosing sides.
Interviewer: There’s a notion among some Palestinian factions and revolutionary groups that regionalizing military actions could serve their cause. What do you make of that perspective?
Dr. Khalil: It’s an interesting strategy. Some believe that by opening new fronts against Israel, it could possibly relieve pressure on the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. However, this approach carries significant risks, including the potential for greater loss of life and destruction. Moreover, there’s the question of whether these groups can effectively coordinate their actions. Historically, divisions among Palestinian and Arab leadership have hampered unified responses.
Interviewer: The article points out the reluctance of various Arab regimes, including Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to take military action against Israel. Why do you think that is?
Dr. Khalil: Many Arab regimes prioritize maintaining stability within their borders over external military adventures. They often face their own internal pressures and threats. Additionally, relationships with the West, particularly regarding military and economic interests, play a significant role. They may criticize Israeli actions publicly but are hesitant to engage militarily, fearing it could lead to overwhelming conflict that destabilizes the region further.
Interviewer: Speaking of military dynamics, the article mentions that Iran’s commitments seem more focused on geopolitical alliances rather than direct support for Palestinian militias. How does that impact the situation?
Dr. Khalil: Indeed, Iran appears to be prioritizing its relationships with Russia and China over immediate military support for the Palestinian cause. This reflects a practical approach—they’re dealing with severe sanctions and internal challenges. While their rhetoric may suggest a commitment to Palestinian solidarity, the reality is that their actions are often aligned with broader strategic interests rather than direct military assistance. This has significant implications for the Palestinians, who may feel abandoned in their struggle.
Interviewer: As a final thought, what do you see as possible pathways to de-escalation in this conflict?
Dr. Khalil: De-escalation would require a multifaceted approach. Initiatives could include promoting dialogue between conflicting parties, increased diplomatic engagement from neutral countries, and a commitment to humanitarian efforts in Gaza, which can foster goodwill. Lastly, addressing the root causes of the conflict—territorial disputes, national identity, and security concerns—would be essential for any long-term solution. However, with the current geopolitical climate, achieving such a resolution remains a significant challenge.
Interviewer: Thank you, Dr. Khalil. Your insights into these complex issues shed light on the multifaceted challenges facing the Middle East today. It’s clear that the road to peace is fraught with obstacles, but understanding these dynamics is crucial.
Dr. Khalil: Thank you for having me. It’s been a great discussion.