2024-11-01 01:09:00
The far-right party preferred to sacrifice more than five hours of this day to useless exchanges rather than admit the left’s defeat. “The parliamentary niche is a parallel world for the French, it only interests politicians and journalistsjustified, the day before, Jean-Philippe Tanguy, vice president of the RN group. This day is above all a matter of performance: we refuse to give up the idea that social issues are secondary for us, to let the newspapers tithe that we are giving up on pension reform. » His party thus allowed the discussion on a devitalized text to drag on for a long time. And the operation “unveiling” of “socio-traitors” promised by the frontists was transformed into the staging of a formation embittered by its own impotence.
The bitterness of the RN lives up to the hopes founded for weeks by the movement on October 31st. With the largest group in the Assembly (125 deputies), therefore the first parliamentary niche in the legislature, the former National Front intended to take by surprise a left trapped in the dilemma between historic concession to the far right or renunciation of a fundamental principle. promise. The communication artillery was ready: a website was created so that voters could write to guilty parliamentarians to renege on their convictions; elected representatives who would then be the subject of leaflets – with name and photo – to be distributed in their electoral constituency. All that was missing was the vote on the thorny text.
“Thug methods!” »
Las. By abstaining in the Social Affairs Committee, many left-wing elected representatives allowed the center and right to cancel the main provisions of the PPL, whose reintroduction through amendments was rejected by the President (Renaissance) of the National Assembly, Yaël Braun -Pivetta. “They thought we would give upreflects Thomas Ménage, rapporteur (RN) of the amputated text. We were ready to do anything to avoid giving the impression of throwing in the towel. »
#National #Assembly #Navy #shows #impotence
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Political Expert on Recent RN Parliamentary Activities
Time.news Editor: Welcome to the show! Today, we have a special guest, Dr. Clara Moreau, a political scientist and expert on far-right movements in Europe. Thanks for joining us, Dr. Moreau!
Dr. Clara Moreau: Thank you for having me! I’m excited to discuss the current political landscape in France.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. Recently, the far-right National Rally (RN) led by Marine Le Pen took center stage in the National Assembly, focusing on what many have described as “useless exchanges” rather than acknowledging the left’s electoral defeat. What do you make of this approach?
Dr. Moreau: It’s quite strategic. By prolonging debates and avoiding direct admission of defeat, the RN is reinforcing its brand identity as a party that challenges the political status quo. Jean-Philippe Tanguy’s comments about parliamentary proceedings being a “parallel world” highlight their goal of appealing to the everyday concerns of ordinary French citizens, elevating social issues over traditional political squabbles.
Editor: Interesting. Tanguy’s remark about the importance of social issues despite their apparent disregard for the left’s victory suggests they’re trying to position themselves as advocates for the people. Do you think this strategy will resonate with voters?
Dr. Moreau: Absolutely. The RN has been skilled at tapping into the sentiments of disenfranchised voters who feel overlooked by mainstream parties. Their refusal to concede defeat reflects a broader strategy of portraying themselves as the voice of the people, suggesting that while others may abandon pressing issues like pension reform, the RN remains committed to addressing these concerns.
Editor: So, you’re saying the RN sees parliament as a theatre for performance, not just governance?
Dr. Moreau: Exactly. They leverage parliamentary debates as a means to showcase their commitment and tenacity. This kind of performance can energize their base and attract undecided voters by framing themselves as the consistent opposition to what they depict as an ineffective establishment.
Editor: It seems like a high-risk, high-reward strategy. What potential backlash could they face?
Dr. Moreau: If they continue to drag debates out without producing tangible solutions, they risk appearing disconnected from reality. Voters are increasingly impatient for real outcomes. If their theatricality is perceived as mere obstructionism, they might alienate some voters seeking pragmatic governance.
Editor: What about the next steps for the RN? How can they use this moment to their advantage going forward?
Dr. Moreau: They need to balance performance with a demonstrable commitment to addressing pressing social issues. Fostering dialogues that go beyond just opposition can help solidify their stance as serious contenders. Moreover, if they can initiate or effectively influence policy discussions on key issues like pension reform, it could showcase their capability beyond just rhetoric.
Editor: That’s an insightful take. As we approach the 2027 elections, how do you foresee the RN’s trajectory in the French political landscape?
Dr. Moreau: It’ll be fascinating to watch. If they can solidify their narrative as champions of the people while offering actionable policies, they might expand their appeal. However, they’ll also face challenges, especially from the left and other center-right parties looking to reclaim lost ground. Maintaining voter trust will be crucial.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Moreau, for sharing your expertise with us. It’s evident that the dynamics within the French National Assembly are intricately tied to broader societal sentiments.
Dr. Moreau: Thank you for having me. It’s always a pleasure to discuss these vital issues.
Editor: Stay tuned as we continue to explore important developments in politics and beyond.