Rep. Lee Jun-seok of the New Reform Party responded to the President’s Office’s explanation on the 31st that “the party leader Lee Jun-seok and Nomination Management Committee Chairman Yoon Sang-hyun were the people who made the nomination decision at the time,” saying, “Where are you trying to sell Lee Jun-seok to make excuses?” “Even sea anemones will respond better than this,” he protested. Rep. Yoon Sang-hyun of the People Power Party said, “It is impossible for the diplomatic committee to report 100% to President-elect Yoon Seok-yeol.”
Rep. Lee said on this day, “I didn’t know that President Yoon was receiving reports from the diplomatic committee, and I didn’t know that he was conveying this information to the candidate’s officials.” He added, “You (the President’s Office) should explain that.” The President’s Office explained on this day, “Lee Jun-seok, the party leader at the time, said on Facebook that there was no problem with the strategic nomination decision.” Rep. Lee targeted the President’s Office and criticized them, saying, “These are the people who planned to kick out the party’s Central Ethics Committee a month from that point.” He added, “Are they going beyond the two heads and now trying to investigate people’s faces?”
In a phone call with the Dong-A Ilbo on this day, Rep. Yoon denied, saying, “Nomination is based on principles and standards and is not influenced by those around you,” and “the statement that the diplomatic committee provides nomination materials to the elected president is untenable.” Rep. Yoon said, “I never discussed the nomination issue with President Yoon at the time, and Rep. Lee never said anything about the nomination.” He also said, “I never spoke on the phone with First Lady Kim Kun-hee about the nomination issue at the time.”
Reporter Lee Sang-heon [email protected]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
-
- I recommend it
- dog
Hot news now
Time.news Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Kim Ji-hoon on Recent Political Tensions in South Korea
Editor (Time.news): Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Kim. There’s been quite a stir in South Korean politics following recent statements from Rep. Lee Jun-seok and Rep. Yoon Sang-hyun regarding nomination decisions. Could you provide some context for our readers?
Dr. Kim Ji-hoon: Absolutely, and thank you for having me. The conflict revolves around the nominations for key positions within the political framework, specifically relating to the New Reform Party and President Yoon Seok-yeol’s administration. It seems that Rep. Lee is questioning the transparency and integrity of the nomination process, which he suggests was mismanaged or inadequately communicated.
Editor: Right, Rep. Lee dramatically criticized the President’s Office, saying their explanations are unconvincing. He even went as far as comparing their responses to a sea anemone. What does this indicate about his perspective on political accountability?
Dr. Kim Ji-hoon: That comparison is certainly striking! It underscores Lee’s frustration with what he sees as a lack of responsiveness and a failure to take accountability. In the political climate of South Korea, where public perception is critical, such remarks aim to mobilize support from constituents who may feel similarly disillusioned by leadership failings. Lee’s comments suggest that he believes the party leadership has an obligation to clearly communicate the rationale behind their decisions.
Editor: Moreover, Rep. Yoon Sang-hyun denied any influence or discussions regarding nominations with President Yoon or even First Lady Kim Kun-hee. What does that tell us about the internal dynamics of the ruling party?
Dr. Kim Ji-hoon: It certainly reveals a fracture in the party’s unity. Yoon’s emphasis on maintaining principles and standards indicates an effort to distance himself from the turmoil, but it may not resonate well with those who expect more cohesion. His denial also brings to light a potential power struggle—where factions within the party may be trying to assert their independence. This could lead to significant ramifications in terms of party loyalty and future nominations.
Editor: The situation seems rife with implications. Do you think this conflict might affect public trust in leadership, especially as we approach upcoming elections?
Dr. Kim Ji-hoon: Definitely. Political trust is heavily influenced by the perceived integrity and accountability of party leaders. If voters perceive that infighting and mismanagement are prevalent within the ruling party, it could drive them towards opposition parties or different political alternatives altogether. This could also lead to a shift in voter priorities if they see some candidates as champions of transparency.
Editor: Lastly, how do you see this situation developing in the near future? Will the tensions simmer down, or is more conflict inevitable?
Dr. Kim Ji-hoon: Given the current environment and the stakes involved, I suspect the tensions will escalate rather than resolve quickly. As long as there are unresolved grievances over nominations and party strategy, we will likely see more public disputes. It’s also possible that external political pressures will force a resolution, but for now, I expect this saga to continue capturing headlines.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Kim, for providing such insightful analysis into this complicated situation. It’s certainly one to watch as it unfolds!
Dr. Kim Ji-hoon: Thank you for having me! It’s crucial for the public to stay informed during these turbulent political times.