Comments express the writer’s opinions.
VG reports that Crown Princess Mette-Marit was alerted that Marius was to be arrested.
A mother will never act rationally when a child is to be protected. However, it is different when you are, in addition to being a mother, Norway’s future queen.
It was not very smart of Crown Princess Mette-Marit. As a mother, she poses a threat to the security of the realm.
Choosing Marius over the kingdom
How Crown Princess Mette-Marit handled the information about the arrest of Marius tells where her loyalty lies. It lies with her son.
She chose to share the information with him. Not only that, but she then chose to tidy up the house before a possible police search. What was she afraid the police would find?
Idiocy, I believe, when you are a crown princess. She demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of her role.
It is of little help that she also allegedly warned the healthcare system so that Marius lost his driver’s license, as reported by Aftenposten. That was to be expected.
For Mette-Marit is not just a mother. She is soon to be the queen of Norway. Time is ticking. It is doubtful whether Mette-Marit is ready for her role.
We will not get the answers. The royal court has stopped answering the phone.
Tove Taalesen
Author, program host, and the online newspaper’s royal expert. Taalesen was Norway’s first female courtier at the Royal Court in 2007 and has worked as a courtier for Their Majesties the King and Queen for over ten years.
She has published two bestselling crime books; “The Queen” and “The Bodyguard,” and is the host of the royal podcast Audiens.
Taalesen holds several board memberships, including with the Authors’ Association.
Follow her on Instagram @tovetaalesen
Surpassing all reason
I have been naive. I have not understood the urge a mother has to protect her son. It clearly surpasses all reason. It transcends all laws and regulations.
Crown Princess Mette-Marit should have let the police do their job. Most importantly for Marius’ own sake, but also to protect the monarchy.
It is utterly ridiculous that Norway’s next queen does not think beyond her nose.
Marius struggles with substance abuse and mental health issues, and it does not seem like the measures the Crown Prince couple has attempted are working. Perhaps they should let him rehabilitate through the process of taking responsibility? If they truly want Marius to receive help, they should allow him to stand on his own two feet and take responsibility for his actions.
Also read: No one should have such dark secrets
Equality before the law?
Who alerted, I do not know. Someone spoke together and apparently thought it was wise to involve the royal family before the police arrested Marius. Was it the police leadership, the head of security at the royal court, or the bodyguard service that thought it was a smart idea?
This is proof that there is not equality before the law in Norway. There is a difference between ordinary people and royalty. Not only do they have financial privileges, but the royal family clearly thinks they are above the law. And Norwegian authorities apparently think the same.
It is no wonder that Marius shows the finger to all of Norway. He has been raised to believe that laws and regulations do not apply to the family.
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Royal Expert Tove Taalesen
Time.news Editor: Welcome, Tove Taalesen! It’s a pleasure to have you here to discuss the recent events involving Crown Princess Mette-Marit and her son, Marius. A lot has been said about her decision to alert Marius about his impending arrest. What are your initial thoughts?
Tove Taalesen: Thank you for having me! It’s a complex situation, to say the least. As a mother, Crown Princess Mette-Marit’s instinct to protect her child is certainly understandable. However, her position as a future queen adds another layer of responsibility. It raises the question of where her loyalties should lie—in her role as a mother or as a member of the royal family.
Editor: Indeed, many are questioning her judgment in this matter. Some believe her actions pose a threat to the security of the realm. Do you agree with that sentiment?
Taalesen: Yes, I do find her actions troubling. When you hold a position of such power and influence, every decision is magnified. By choosing to prioritize Marius’s safety over the royal duties, she seems to demonstrate a lack of understanding of her future role and its implications for the monarchy. This isn’t just about family; it’s about the state’s security as well.
Editor: She also went so far as to tidy up the house before a possible police search. What might that imply about her state of mind during this crisis?
Taalesen: That’s a perplexing action. It indicates a certain level of fear—a fear of what the authorities might find. It suggests that she could be trying to shield Marius from more than just the immediate consequences of his actions. It raises questions about transparency and accountability, not just for her but for the royal family as a whole.
Editor: You mentioned that this situation might reflect on her capability to step into her role as queen. Do you think the public will have a difficult time accepting her if she doesn’t demonstrate the appropriate judgment?
Taalesen: Absolutely. Public perception is crucial for any monarch. If she continues to prioritize familial loyalty over her duties to the kingdom, it could lead to a loss of trust among the people. The monarchy relies on its image of stability and integrity. It is vital that she proves able to balance her personal emotions with her public responsibilities.
Editor: There’s also the matter of her alerting the healthcare system, which resulted in Marius losing his driver’s license. Was this a wise move on her part?
Taalesen: In my view, it was a necessary move for the safety of Marius and others. However, it raises further questions about her priorities and decision-making process. While protecting her son from immediate danger is laudable, the implications of these actions need to be considered in the broader context of her royal duties.
Editor: It sounds like we might not have clear answers any time soon, especially since the royal court has ceased communication on this matter. What do you think this silence signifies?
Taalesen: The refusal to comment suggests they are aware of the gravity of the situation and are trying to manage the narrative. This silence can act as a double-edged sword—it may preserve their privacy and control over the situation, but it can also lead to speculation and mistrust amongst the public. Transparency is often key in royal affairs, and a lack of communication may ultimately complicate their standing.
Editor: Thank you for sharing your insights, Tove. This situation is undoubtedly evolving, and it will be interesting to see how it impacts the royal family in Norway moving forward.
Taalesen: Thank you for having me. I look forward to discussing this further as it unfolds—there’s much more to come, I’m sure!