Tabacco Tax Moratorium: ‘Completely Ineffective’ claim Alliance Against Tobacco

by time news

A professor specializing in public‍ health and president of the Alliance Against Tobacco criticizes repeated budget ⁢ministers’ decisions to freeze cigarette prices.

He⁢ argues that price increases, while intended to⁤ combat⁤ inflation, are ‍ineffective ⁣in reducing smoking rates.

Instead, he proposes raising cigarette prices by €1-€2, twice ‌annually, to​ significantly impact⁤ consumption.

The professor accuses budget ministers, including Laurent ⁣Saint-Martin, of succumbing to pressure from tobacco industry lobbies, particularly tobacconists, who oppose​ price hikes.

He ​highlights the ongoing ⁢”Month Without Tobacco” campaign, emphasizing the need for effective‌ policies ​to curb smoking.

The professor urges anyone struggling with substance dependence to seek help through anonymous support services.
Time.news Interview: Public Health Expert Critiques Budget Ministers ⁤on⁢ Cigarette Price Freezes

Q: Thank you for joining us today. As a public health professor and president of‌ the Alliance Against Tobacco, you have been ‍vocal about the ⁣current cigarette pricing ‌policies. Can you explain your main concerns ⁤regarding the ‌recent budget ministers’ decisions to freeze cigarette prices?

A: Thank you⁣ for⁤ having me. My primary concern is that the repeated freezes on ‍cigarette prices, while seemingly an attempt ‌to combat inflation, are fundamentally misguided when it comes to public health. ‌These decisions‍ ignore the ⁣substantial evidence showing that price‌ increases are one of​ the ‌most effective tools we have to reduce smoking rates. ⁤Instead of helping public health, these freezes effectively cater​ to the demands‌ of the tobacco industry and undermine the⁢ fight against smoking​ prevalence.

Q:⁤ You mentioned ​that price increases‌ could ‍significantly impact consumption. Could you ⁤elaborate on your proposal ⁣of ‌increasing cigarette prices by ⁢€1-€2 twice annually? How‌ would this strategy ‍work ⁤in practice?

A: Absolutely. The⁢ rationale behind my proposal is straightforward. Incremental increases in​ cigarette prices can create a ‌substantial economic deterrent for smokers, particularly for young people or those considering smoking.‌ By instituting regular, predictable price hikes—specifically, €1-€2 every six‌ months—we can systematically ⁣reduce affordability, ‌encourage quitting, and ultimately shift societal norms surrounding tobacco⁤ use. This is not just ​theory; numerous studies highlight the‍ correlation between price and consumption, showcasing that higher prices lead ⁣to lower smoking rates.

Q: You have specifically ‍called out budget ministers like ⁤Laurent Saint-Martin for succumbing to tobacco industry pressures. Can you give us insights into how this lobbying affects ​public health policies?

A: Tobacco industry⁢ lobbies, ​including tobacconists, have significant influence and often prioritize short-term economic⁢ interests over long-term public health. When budget ministers ⁢freeze prices due to pressure from these lobbies, they compromise the ‌health of the community. It’s critical that ‍our policymakers ⁤recognize ⁢their responsibility to ⁤prioritize public health over financial contributions and lobbying ⁣from the tobacco sector. The power ⁤of ‌lobbying can skew policies ⁢away from ‌what is necessary ​to​ protect future generations from the harms of smoking.

Q: With the⁣ ongoing⁣ “Month Without⁤ Tobacco” ⁢campaign, how do​ you think ‍society can better support individuals looking ⁢to quit smoking?

A: The⁢ “Month Without Tobacco” campaign is an excellent⁢ initiative that⁣ raises ‍awareness and encourages people to quit. However, ⁣we need ⁣to ⁢accompany it with effective policies. This includes not just price hikes but also providing ‌accessible​ resources and support ⁢systems. For individuals struggling with substance dependence, it’s vital to seek help through anonymous support⁢ services. People need ‍to know that⁤ they ‍are not⁤ alone in their struggle and that professional assistance is available.

Q: What⁢ practical⁢ advice can you provide ‍to ‍individuals looking to reduce tobacco consumption​ or quit smoking during campaigns like this?

A: My ​key ​advice would​ be to take advantage of available resources, ‌whether it’s counseling, support groups, or cessation programs.‍ Setting realistic goals can ⁢be incredibly beneficial; instead of‌ overwhelming oneself, one can‌ gradually reduce consumption. Additionally, finding alternative ⁤coping strategies‍ or engaging in activities that‍ distract ​from the urge to‍ smoke can be ‍very helpful. Ultimately, creating a plan⁤ and seeking help are crucial ‌steps toward success in ⁣quitting smoking.

Q: Thank you for ‍your insights. Is there a final message⁣ you would like to share with our ‌readers?

A: I encourage everyone⁢ to ⁢stay ⁤informed and advocate for policies that promote health over profit. We need to make our voices‍ heard‌ in supporting tobacco control measures that protect public health. Together, we ​can work towards a ⁤tobacco-free future, and I urge ​anyone struggling with dependence to ⁢seek help and take steps‌ towards a healthier life.


This interview sheds light on⁣ the critical connection between government policy,‌ tobacco pricing, and public health strategies. By following these insights, readers‌ can play an active role in promoting a healthier society.

You may also like

Leave a Comment