Carlos Alcaraz, surprised the Frenchman Ugo Humbert in the round of 16 of the Paris Masters

by time news

The Spaniards Carlos Alcaraznumber 2​ in the world, went astray this Thursday‍ in ‍round 16 of ⁤the Masters​ of Paris 1,000 against France Hugo Humbert (18), ⁣ unorthodox tennis player who ⁤ended up⁤ winning 6-1, 3-6 and⁣ 7-5 in 2 hours⁢ and 20‌ minutes.

Out⁢ of the middle at the start of⁢ the game, the player from Murcia managed to balance the contest with patience and skill, but, when it seemed that his game was at the best level, he ‍ran ‍into a tough⁤ competition with support from the stands. Nothing like the bath he⁣ gave her a ​month ago i Valentine in Davis Cupinside ‌too.​ In Paris he ⁤encountered a rival with more ‌confidence​ and more solid tennis.

Alcaraz⁢ added ⁢his second win of the year in the French capital, where he has ​won 13 times,⁢ and once again showed that the ‌indoor competition does not give him⁣ luck. He‌ fell in the round ⁤of 16 as‌ it‌ was in his first performance‍ against the Frenchman Hugo Gastónbut⁣ on this occasion⁢ he fought‌ harder for victory.

It took the world number 2 a while to ⁢find ​his best and ⁣when he did, he found Humbert full of confidence, settled in a community that loved him and could put ​tennis on display which adapts like a glove to⁣ the conditions⁤ it presents. the ⁢competition. Quite the opposite to Alcaraz, who only⁣ got brilliance at times, but it was not enough to overcome the nightmare start that gave wings​ to his rival.

The Frenchman entered the⁤ game like a hurricanean aggressive tornado that turned ⁢his⁣ left leg into a ‌fearsome weapon. There is ⁣nothing orthodox in ⁤the 18th ⁤in the world, which takes the game to madness, with ‍its serving outside ⁤the center, its aggressive⁢ game, its lack of‍ rhythm that complicates ‌the dynamic.

In the ​first set⁣ it was all on his side, because Alcaraz was absent, missing​ on the center court shouting in⁤ favor of ⁢his rival,⁤ but not against him, enough not to‍ wake up the ghosts of​ his duel on ‍that⁤ same​ stage through a year ago. against⁢ Hugo Gastón.

But nothing⁢ was working on the part of ​the Spaniard, who raised the errors and turned‍ his​ rival, whom⁤ he defeated‍ in Valencia a ‌month ago, into a surprise. In 18 ‍minutes, the scoreboard already threw out‌ a blushing score, 5-0, twelve errors nor forced ⁢and only two winners from the ⁤Spaniard, who let the‍ first series‍ slip away with only 14 points in his locker.

The ‌public rubbed their ‌eyes, half⁢ enthusiastic about ⁣the achievement of their colleagues and saddened by the sad performance of one of their​ idols. CAlcaraz⁣ was in ‌danger of abandoning the competition as last year, almost by default, not being ‌able to find a ⁣way to combat Humbert’s heterodoxy.

The Spaniard did not ⁤despair, he continued to run⁤ at the back ⁤of the⁢ track following ‌the dictates ​of the Frenchman, waiting for the Frenchman’s machinery to start rusting, for him to start making mistakes looking for ⁣risk.

The ‌second set was a different story. It was no longer a monologue‌ and Humbert began to be⁢ suspicious, synonymous with mistakes. Alcaraz took a step forward, started to find his shots and after serving ⁢his threat in the fourth, he took⁣ it down in the sixth,⁢ bringing the Frenchman down​ from the clouds.

Now⁤ the contest ‌was ‍even and ⁤Alcaraz seemed to regain his⁤ composure and​ his⁢ smile, which looked wide during the long break⁤ the Frenchman took to go to the⁤ bathroom. The ‌duel was ⁣set to ‌be a battle from power to power, because if Alcaraz ⁤managed⁤ to ‌recover his tennis and give away some of the‌ great points that ​forged his legend, Humbert did not‍ go away and‍ the game took‍ on‌ an epic air.

One of the‍ solutions in the wire, in the fine​ details that separate⁢ victory ‍from defeat ⁤when ⁤both deserve more. ‌Alcaraz then failed, as ⁢he was unable ‌to complete several well-constructed key points to⁣ gain an ‍advantage.which gave oxygen to the ‍Frenchman who‍ did not waste his opportunities.

Decentralized in the ⁢final, he let his serve​ slip away and ended his ​love affair with Paris. Ugo Humbert, the ‍best⁤ ranked Frenchman, He ⁤will compete for ⁢a place in the semi-finals against ‌Australian Jordan Thompson, 28th in ‌the world, who defeated⁢ Frenchman Adrian⁢ Mannarino.

Interview Between Time.news Editor and Tennis ⁣Expert

Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome, everyone! Today, ‍we’re⁤ diving ⁤into the recent upset at the Paris Masters, where world number two, Carlos Alcaraz, was knocked out in the round of 16 by the unorthodox ​French player, Hugo Humbert. Here with us is tennis expert, Dr. Sarah Thompson. Sarah, thank you for joining us.

Dr. Sarah⁤ Thompson (DST): Thank⁢ you for having me! It’s great to discuss such⁣ an intriguing match.

TNE: Let’s get straight to it. Alcaraz, who has been dominating the tour⁢ this year,‍ faced Humbert in what many ⁣thought would be a straightforward victory for the​ Spaniard. What do you ⁢think went wrong for Alcaraz?

DST: Well, it was certainly​ a surprising result. Alcaraz started the match in a very shaky manner. He seemed to struggle with his rhythm, racking up errors and only managing two winners in‍ the first ⁢set. Humbert came out aggressively, and that put Alcaraz on the⁢ back foot right from the start.

TNE: Yes, Humbert indeed played overwhelmingly well. His unique style and left-handed serves really seemed to disrupt Alcaraz’s game. In your opinion, how did Humbert’s unorthodox approach give him an edge?

DST: Humbert’s style ⁣is unpredictable ‍and creates challenges for opponents who are used to a more conventional game. His varied serving patterns and aggressive tactics threw ‌Alcaraz​ off balance, especially since he had recently faced ⁢Humbert in Valencia and won. ⁢Sometimes, a player can become overconfident in previous victories, and that might have played a role in Alcaraz’s ‌mindset heading into this match.

TNE: It was⁢ also interesting to see the crowd’s influence.⁢ Humbert received a lot of support from the Parisian‌ crowd, ⁣which you’d think‌ would add ​pressure⁤ on Alcaraz. How significant is crowd support in matches like⁢ this?

DST: Crowd support can be a double-edged sword. For Humbert, the enthusiastic audience certainly bolstered his confidence. For Alcaraz, it⁣ likely amplified his struggles. He ⁤was not‌ only battling a ​tough opponent but also the expectations and pressure from the stands. It can be particularly daunting in an indoor setting, where crowd noise resonates differently.

TNE: Alcaraz showed resilience ⁤in the second set, managing to rebound and find some form. Do you think this performance reflects on his maturity as a ⁤player?

DST: Absolutely!⁢ Despite ⁢the disappointing start, his ability to adjust and fight back demonstrates growth. He showcased glimpses of his incredible talent, but ultimately, it wasn’t enough against a player who ⁤was much more⁣ settled. This experience could serve as valuable learning for​ him moving ​forward, particularly for high-stakes ⁢matches against unconventional players.

TNE: So, what does this mean for⁤ Alcaraz moving into the next tournaments? Is this​ setback a critical​ moment in his career?

DST: Every player ‌has ups and‍ downs, and this match ⁣will certainly sting for Alcaraz. However, setbacks can be invaluable teachers. He’s still very young, and⁤ I believe he’ll take away important lessons from this ​match. If ⁣he can review what went wrong and learn how​ to adapt more quickly to different‌ playing styles, I expect him to bounce back even‍ stronger.

TNE: ⁣ Great‌ insights, Sarah. Alcaraz has shown such promise this year, and we’re excited to see how he responds. Thank you for⁣ sharing your thoughts with⁤ us!

DST: Thank you for having me! I’m looking forward to seeing how the rest ‍of the tennis season⁤ unfolds.

TNE: ⁣ And to our audience, stay tuned for more ‌coverage on the Paris Masters and the exciting developments in the⁣ tennis world!

You may also like

Leave a Comment