Maria Rosaria Boccia returns to Piazzapulita as she, Corrado Formigli’s guest, talks again about the Sangiuliano case. “From a judicial point of view – she explains – the stage is an investigation. I have not heard yet and the investigations are not yet closed “, but “I will not stop dealing with this matter because I continue to hear things about myself. which is not true”.
“It seems to me that, instead of being considered in the investigation, I am approached daily by journalists who are all judges of the Supreme Court. Fake news really bothers me,” continues Boccia, who explains that she “does not go out and about , I live separated at home”, says the woman at the center of the scandal that hit Mic, which led Sangiuliano to resign.
Then Formigli asks her about the ‘golden key to Pompeii’ that was missing and ended up in the middle of the story: “Who has the 12 thousand euro key to Pompeii? In an interview with La Stampa the former minister says that the key is registered and It is at the Ministry Then he sends a letter saying that it is not at the ministry and that it could be at my house … I don’t have it “, he said. And on the image of Sangiuliano’s head wound with clear stitches shown by Report, Boccia emphasizes: ”We should also put a date on the day he put the stitches … I can no more say now though. Even if I am very tempted”.
Quarrel in the studio with Mouthpiece
In the studio, therefore, the fight comes alive with Italo Bocchino. “I am here because I was not given a job,” says the entrepreneur. “The contract does not exist, as you would say in the story. It is in the ministry, no one has torn it, it has not been co-signed. There is a process that is not finished. And why it has not been completed. Completed. Me and the child going in the morning to do the analyses…'”. “Have you seen the contract? You don’t answer me… Is this written in the email? You take responsibility for what you say.” “I will follow it for you…” replied Bocchino, before the host stopped him.
Also read
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Maria Rosaria Boccia
Editor: Welcome, Maria Rosaria Boccia! It’s a pleasure to have you here at Time.news to discuss your recent appearance on Piazzapulita regarding the Sangiuliano case. As the situation unfolds, can you shed light on where things currently stand?
Boccia: Thank you for having me! The situation, from a judicial perspective, is still very much in the investigative stage. As I mentioned, I haven’t been formally approached and the investigations are not yet closed. This adds to the complexity of the entire issue.
Editor: It sounds like the uncertainty is quite challenging. You highlighted in your discussion that you will not cease to engage with the matter despite ongoing speculation. What fuels your determination?
Boccia: Absolutely! The misinformation circulating is incredibly frustrating. I feel as though instead of being engaged in the investigation, my narrative is being shaped by journalists who often act as if they were judges. The sensationalism and fake news surrounding this case are not just bothersome; they undermine the truth and can complicate the judicial process.
Editor: That’s a very important point. False narratives can significantly impact public perception. How have you dealt with the broader media landscape, where it seems everyone has an opinion?
Boccia: It’s important to distinguish between informed commentary and mere speculation. I’m committed to clarifying the facts. For instance, the rumors about me are not only inaccurate but also damaging. I believe in the need for responsible journalism that prioritizes truth over sensationalism. This is why I am dedicated to speaking out about these issues.
Editor: Your experience highlights the ongoing struggle between media freedoms and the need for factual reporting. How do you see the role of journalists evolving in cases like these?
Boccia: Journalists have a duty to investigate, but with that comes immense responsibility. In cases of legal significance, the media should act more like facilitators of truth rather than sensational commentators. I hope that through discourse and transparency, we can foster a media environment where truth prevails over sensationalism.
Editor: This leads us to the impact of social media. How do you think platforms like Twitter and Facebook contribute to the spread of false information during sensitive cases?
Boccia: Social media can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it democratizes information access, but on the other, it allows for the rapid dissemination of unverified allegations. The lack of accountability on these platforms makes it easier for misinformation to flourish. We need stricter guidelines and an emphasis on verification before sharing critical information.
Editor: That’s an insightful perspective. Going forward, what are your hopes for the resolution of the Sangiuliano case, both personally and for the public?
Boccia: Personally, I hope for a fair and unbiased investigation that reveals the truth. For the public, my hope is that trust can be restored in institutions and the media. Clarity and transparency in this case are vital. People deserve to know the truth without the noise of misinformation clouding their understanding.
Editor: Thank you, Maria Rosaria, for sharing your thoughts. It’s clear that your commitment to truth and accountability is unwavering. We look forward to seeing how things unfold in the Sangiuliano case and hope for a positive resolution.
Boccia: Thank you for having me! I appreciate the opportunity to discuss these important issues.