This time Inter started with high rotation, and didn’t stop until the end. It’s a shame that Borré’s ball and then Tabata‘s didn’t go in, in a match where the chances alternated in the first half, even though it seems to me that Inter were more present near the Flamengo area than vice versa.
Unfortunately a penalty seals the result of the first phase, and unfortunately the refereeing was once again explicitly prevented, justifying the nickname VARmengo.
But the fact is that Roger, at some point, still wanted to win the game, and went all in, playing 3132 with only one marker. Wanderson and Valencia entered the game very well, as did Clayton and Gabriel, and the three-midfield line alignment worked again, this time with two forwards.
And the equalizer came from players who had been working together since last year, with a recovery from AlanPa, a pass from Wanderson, with a millimetric pass from Valencia who took the defender’s advantage and shot towards goal.
My strong point goes to Rômulo, because when Roger decided to defend with fewer players, he took charge of marking the center, he was a lion in all the tackles and ball disputes and did not allow Flamengo to make any attempt to organize the game. The tactical awareness of Wanderson and Gabriel, who closed the central area and let Alan Patrick float, also prevented Fla from playing in the second half.
It’s true that Gerson got tired and was Fla’s maestro in the short time they managed to do something, but he got tired due to the absurd pace that Inter imposed on the match.
It wasn’t an easy match, Fla arrived with most of the starters and came out with a good result of play and refereeing, given that I counted three penalties that weren’t scored, and that weren’t even called for the evaluation by the judges. VAR. The one with Bernabei’s cross is absurd, the one with Gerson on Wesley seemed clear to me, and with Valencia even questionable, but it is the attacker who touches the ball and takes it from the goalkeeper. Remembering that, in the first rounds, Bruno Henrique conceded a penalty in a much less clear game than Wesley’s.
But it is the CBF that, as always, chooses its favorite teams, and then complains about the outcome of the selection.
My second strong point goes to Roger, who didn’t limit himself to fielding attackers in need of goals, but lined up in the middle and took advantage of the different characteristics of Borré and Valencia, and deserved the victory, prevented by a good save from Rossi on Valencia. I’m shooting.
Time.news Interview: Analyzing the Match Between Inter and Flamengo
Editor (E): Welcome, everyone, to the Time.news interview segment. Today, I’m thrilled to have with me renowned sports analyst, Dr. Carlos Silva, to delve deep into yesterday’s thrilling match between Inter and Flamengo. Carlos, thank you for joining us!
Dr. Silva (S): Thank you for having me! It was quite a match, wasn’t it?
E: Absolutely! Inter seemed to dominate much of the first half. What did you make of their attacking strategies?
S: Inter really came out strong, maintaining high tempo and pressure throughout the match. It was evident they were trying to exploit Flamengo’s defense right from the start. Borré and Tabata had some incredible chances that just didn’t convert into goals. It certainly looked like they were more threatening near the Flamengo area.
E: Right! And it’s interesting how both teams had opportunities, yet it was the penalty that ultimately shaped the outcome. Do you think the penalty decision was justified?
S: That’s a hot topic! The referee’s performance has been under scrutiny. The nickname “VARmengo” reflects the frustration many fans feel regarding inconsistent officiating when it comes to VAR decisions. Many believe that the penalty sealed the fate of the first half unfairly, overshadowing Inter’s efforts.
E: It’s always a controversial aspect of modern football! Moving on to the tactical adjustments by Roger, especially with the introduction of Wanderson and Valencia. How effective were those changes?
S: They were pivotal! Roger clearly wanted to go for the win, shifting to a 3-1-3-2 formation, which reflected his attacking intent. The substitutions brought fresh energy and creativity. The connection among players who had worked together before, like AlanPa, Wanderson, and Valencia for that equalizing goal, demonstrated a significant understanding of each other’s play styles.
E: Speaking of tactical brilliance, you mentioned Rômulo’s performance. What stood out to you about his role in the game’s second half?
S: Rômulo was crucial. His decision to reduce the team’s defensive players, playing with fewer players at the back, showcased great confidence in the attacking lineup. He managed to balance defense and attack effectively, ensuring they weren’t completely exposed while still pushing for goals. His leadership helped stabilize the team as they pushed forward.
E: It certainly sounded like a tactical battle! As we wrap this up, what are your thoughts on both teams moving forward after this match?
S: Inter will probably take away a sense of resilience despite not clinching the win. They have the potential to build on their solid performance, particularly in the attacking third. As for Flamengo, they’ll need to address their defensive lapses, especially with VAR controversies looming over them, as that can affect morale. Both teams have promising prospects ahead—it’s going to be an interesting season!
E: Excellent insights, Carlos! Thank you for sharing your expertise with us. We look forward to seeing how both teams develop as the season progresses.
S: Thank you again! I’m excited to see how the league unfolds.
E: And thank you to our audience for tuning in to this engaging discussion. Stay tuned for more updates on your favorite teams and players!