Israel Katz named successor as Foreign Minister
Protesters protest… Hostage families “Negotiation efforts are free”
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sacked Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.
According to the Times of Israel on the 5th (local time), the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office announced that Prime Minister Netanyahu had informed Minister Gallant in a letter that “his term of office will end in 48 hours.”
“Unfortunately, although there was trust and very beneficial work in the early days of the war, over the past few months trust between the defense ministers has broken down,” Netanyahu explained in a video statement.
He added that there was a disagreement regarding wartime policy, and that Minister Gallant had been making words and actions that ran counter to the cabinet’s decisions.
He also claimed that Minister Gallant had indirectly helped Israel’s enemies, saying, “We have made many attempts to bridge this gap, but the gap has continued to grow.”
Foreign Minister Israel Katz was appointed as his successor. Deputy Foreign Minister Gideon Saar will take over as minister.
Secretary Gallant issued a statement after his dismissal, saying, “Israel’s national security has always been my life’s mission, and it will continue to be so.”
This decision was made amid a conflict between Netanyahu’s cabinet and Minister Gallant over the conscription of ultra-Orthodox members. A presidential election is also being held in the United States, an ally of Israel.
It is reported that the heads of the military and intelligence agencies are also planned to be replaced.
Citing sources, Israeli media Walla reported that Prime Minister Netanyahu plans to replace Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Chief of Staff Herzy Halevi and Shin Bet Director Ronen Bar.
In Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, hundreds of citizens took to the streets to protest the dismissal of Minister Gallant. Some protesters blocked the highway and set fire to it.
Families of hostages detained in the Gaza Strip said, “This dismissal is unfortunate evidence that the Israeli government’s priorities are wrong,” and condemned it as part of an effort to scuttle hostage negotiations.
Prime Minister Netanyahu tried to dismiss Minister Gallant in March of last year, before the outbreak of the war in Gaza, on the grounds that he was opposed to reforming the judicial system, but withdrew the plan after tens of thousands of people protested at the time.
[서울=뉴시스]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
- I’m angry
- 0dog
- I recommend it
- dog
Hot news now
Interview between Time.news Editor and Political Analyst Dr. Sarah Levin
Time.news Editor: Good day, Dr. Levin, and thank you for joining us today. The recent dismissal of Defense Minister Yoav Gallant has certainly made headlines. Could you provide some context on this significant political shift in Israel?
Dr. Sarah Levin: Absolutely, thank you for having me. The dismissal of Minister Gallant by Prime Minister Netanyahu is fairly indicative of the current tensions within the Israeli government. The fallout arises from a breakdown of trust between Netanyahu and Gallant, particularly in how the war in Gaza has been managed. It seems Gallant’s views on wartime policy diverged sharply from those of the Prime Minister, leading to his ousting.
Time.news Editor: It’s notable that Netanyahu framed Gallant’s dismissal as a matter of national security, suggesting that Gallant had acted in ways contrary to cabinet decisions and indirectly aided Israel’s enemies. How does that rhetoric play into the larger narrative of the ongoing conflict?
Dr. Sarah Levin: Netanyahu’s statements are indeed strategic. By characterizing the departure as a security issue, he’s not only justifying the dismissal but also reinforcing his assertive leadership stance during a time of crisis. It perpetuates the narrative that his administration is taking necessary steps to safeguard the nation, even if it leads to unrest within the government ranks.
Time.news Editor: Speaking of unrest, the protests erupting in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem after Gallant’s dismissal illustrate public discontent. What implications do you think these protests have for Netanyahu’s government?
Dr. Sarah Levin: Protests are a significant indicator of public sentiment, especially in such a crucial moment. Families of hostages, in particular, have voiced their frustrations, accusing the government of prioritizing political maneuvers over critical negotiations for the hostages held in Gaza. This can exacerbate tensions between the government and the public, potentially undermining Netanyahu’s support base if these issues aren’t addressed. A government that appears disconnected from its citizens’ concerns risks losing legitimacy and power.
Time.news Editor: You mentioned the families of hostages and the perspective they bring to the situation. How do you see this affecting the negotiating landscape for Israel moving forward?
Dr. Sarah Levin: The families’ outcry puts tremendous pressure on the government to prioritize the safe return of the hostages. If Netanyahu is perceived as neglecting this issue in favor of internal political dynamics, it could significantly harm his standing internationally and domestically. The ability to negotiate effectively will hinge on public confidence in the leadership’s commitment to resolving such humanitarian concerns.
Time.news Editor: Additionally, there are reports of planned changes in military and intelligence leadership. What do you think the consequences of such changes might be, given the current security landscape?
Dr. Sarah Levin: Leadership changes in the military and intelligence agencies can lead to a shift in strategy and operational focus, especially during a prolonged conflict. If Netanyahu follows through on these changes, it might signal a reevaluation of military tactics, but it also runs the risk of creating instability within the defense apparatus. New leaders may bring fresh ideas, but they also need time to gain the trust of their subordinates and allies. Meanwhile, the clock is ticking with ongoing conflicts that require immediate and effective responses.
Time.news Editor: Dr. Levin, your insights have been incredibly enlightening. As the situation develops, we appreciate your expertise on these critical issues. Thank you for your time.
Dr. Sarah Levin: Thank you for having me. It’s important that we keep exploring these dynamics as they unfold.