What will happen to stock prices under President Trump? |. Strategy Report |

by time news

The report that‍ stock strategists are writing⁤ today, November 7,‌ in response to the results of the US presidential election, could​ not be better titled “What will happen to your stock prices under President Trump?” write reports‌ with⁣ similar titles. If you are not in a hurry, it is a good idea to read all these reports. You can be sure that you‌ will not find any useful information about investing.‌ Then why did I say “read all those⁢ reports”?⁤ Some people may get angry. That’s why I added the ⁤note, “For those⁤ who are not in‌ a hurry.” It will just be a long way ⁤to kill time⁤ and⁣ listen to the complaints of the oil seller.

So, on to the main topic. What will happen to ‌stock prices under President Trump? But the answer is…

The ⁤answer is! ?

The answer is!⁤ ! ! ?

“What will happen to stock prices under President Trump?” The answer is “I don’t know.”

Yesterday, on November 6, in the Tokyo‍ market, the Nikkei average rose by 1005 yen. In the New York market,‌ the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1,508 points. A classic Trump trade‍ happened. But that’s the reaction of “Pavlov’s dog”. They⁣ were told that if​ Trump won ⁣the⁤ dollar and stocks would go up, so they just reacted accordingly. It is a conditioned reflex. Why would Trump ​cause the dollar and stocks to rise? It seems logical, but it’s not.

One rationale is that Trump will improve the US economy through tax⁤ cuts and deregulation, leading to a stronger dollar and higher stock prices, but that’s a short-sighted idea.

Needless to say, we must ⁣also consider the balance with other policies. What about customs duties? Of⁣ course, this will put downward pressure on the world economy. For the United States, it will be ‌a source of⁢ inflation. If that happens, what‍ will happen to the Fed’s interest rate cuts? In some cases, it may⁣ worsen. What about energy policy? What about⁢ an EV? What ​about immigration⁤ policy? The‍ various measures and their impact on​ the US economy are too complex to predict.

First, the policies are contradictory. Dan Ivascyn, global chief ⁢investment officer at major US asset ‍management company​ Pimco, ‍responded as follows in an interview with the Nikkei ‌Shimbun. “(Trump’s) policies⁣ are contradicting each other, and although we have spent a lot of time discussing‍ them internally, we do not have a⁤ clear position regarding the direction of the exchange rate.”

In other words, it’s like this. Even ⁣at a major global asset management company like Pimco, ​we’ve had internal discussions and the conclusion​ is that we don’t know.

This is because‍ the ⁣policies are contradictory.

Being contradictory means that⁣ it is not consistent, and⁢ if we think about it in theory, it is normal to think ​that these policies (which are not all) will not be implemented.

As with tariffs last time, there are exemptions and⁢ exceptions,‍ and we won’t know how much of an impact they will have until they are implemented.

In that case,

Now that Trump (and⁤ the Congress‍ is also a ⁣Republican), such policies have been implemented, and as a result this sector will benefit, and this ⁤sector‌ will be disadvantaged…

It turns out that I can’t draw pictures easily.⁣ In other words, there ​is no ‌way of knowing whether the policies announced at ‌the time of the election will be implemented as they are.

Trump proposed during the election that he would end inflation. Can we do anything to stimulate inflation? I wouldn’t do that, normally.​ However, ⁤Trump is not normal.​ So I might do it. We have to think from this level.

In other words, everything is yet to come. You can⁢ not buy ahead of time. We have no choice but to answer one by ⁤one. This ​is the beginning of four years.

Interview Between Time.news Editor ⁣and Dan Ivascyn, Global Chief Investment Officer at Pimco

Time.news Editor (TNE): Good morning, Dan!⁤ Thank you ⁢for joining us ​today. With the recent ⁤outcome of the​ US presidential election, many are ‍left wondering‌ how stock prices will be affected‌ under President Trump. What’s your initial reaction to this?

Dan‍ Ivascyn (DI): Good morning! It’s ​great to be here. ‍As​ always with such transitions, there’s a lot of speculation, but the reality ⁣is that the answer to⁢ how stock prices will be impacted is ⁢quite ​complex. To put it simply: I don’t know.

TNE: ‌That’s quite candid! There seems to be a prevailing belief that Trump’s policies, specifically tax cuts and deregulation, will propel the economy forward. Do you​ share this view, ‌or do you think it’s too simplistic?

DI: I think that’s a‌ short-sighted‍ view. While it’s true that tax cuts and deregulation can stimulate short-term growth, we need to consider ⁣the broader implications of his policies. For⁤ example, the potential introduction of customs duties could create upward pressure on inflation, which complicates matters.

TNE: So, you’re suggesting that​ the interplay between various‌ policies could‌ pose​ challenges? Could you elaborate on that?

DI: Absolutely.⁣ The policies often contradict⁣ each other. On one hand, you have tax cuts that might boost certain sectors, but on the ‍other,⁢ tariffs could suppress global demand and create inflationary pressures in⁣ the US. Then we⁢ have energy ‍policies and ⁣the transition to electric vehicles, and those can also have substantial ramifications — both economically and environmentally.

TNE: ​ Interesting. Earlier, you ⁤mentioned the reaction of ⁣the stock market‌ being akin ⁢to “Pavlov’s dog” conditioning.⁢ Can you explain that analogy a bit more?

DI: Of course! When people hear that Trump has won the election, they’ve been conditioned to believe that this will lead to rising stock prices and a stronger dollar. So, they respond‌ reflexively, ⁤buying⁣ stocks, which ​creates a surge in the market. However, this reaction is based more on instinct than on the underlying fundamentals of the economy, many of which remain uncertain.

TNE: So, you believe⁣ that market reactions can be misleading, especially in the⁣ context of such a complicated political landscape?

DI: Exactly. Investors need to look⁣ beyond‌ the initial reactions⁣ and understand ⁤the real impacts of multifaceted‌ policies. The economic ‍landscape is⁤ shaped by ‍numerous⁣ factors, and we must analyze these ‍critically rather⁤ than ‌rely solely on conditioned responses.

TNE: That raises an important question: how should investors approach their strategies in this ⁢unpredictable​ environment?

DI: Investors should be cautious. It’s wise ​to be well-informed about how various policy⁤ changes can‌ affect different sectors, and to‌ be prepared for volatility. Diversification and a long-term perspective are key.

TNE: Lastly, Dan, as you look at the broader picture, what do you think will be the fundamental takeaway for investors‌ as we head into this new administration?

DI: The fundamental takeaway is⁤ that markets may experience significant shifts influenced by contrasting ⁢policies. Investors must remain adaptable and informed, ​keeping an eye on⁤ the ⁢global picture ​rather than reacting solely to national headlines. This isn’t a time for knee-jerk reactions; it’s a​ time for strategic​ thinking.

TNE: Thank you for sharing your insights, Dan. It’s‌ always enlightening to ‍hear from experts like you‌ who view the complexities of the ⁤economy with a⁢ critical ⁢eye. We appreciate⁤ your time today!

DI: Thank you⁣ for having me! It’s been a pleasure to discuss these important issues with you.

You may also like

Leave a Comment