The massacre | FranceEvening

by time news

2024-11-11 19:00:00

As in‌ the song⁤ by Georges Brassens whose ​title I used‌ above, the French gendarmes (“pandores”) are also the unfortunate victims‌ of “The Massacre” that I will tell you about​ today. The⁤ one that occurred on November 7,‌ 2024 in the Middle East, fortunately⁢ without deaths. ⁢Otherwise the similarities end there.

Let me explain.

The facts did‌ not​ occur.” At the Brive-la-Gaillarde market ”, as in the original version, but in East Jerusalem. ​However, as in the muscular story told by “the pornographer” (1), it is on ​French territory that “ the brawl » ‌he intervened in question. In “Eléona”, precisely, one of the four religious enclaves that ⁤France⁢ has in this neighborhood of the ⁣holy city,‍ a Palestinian ‍neighborhood, but occupied by Israel since 1967.

So, these are ​not” gendarmicidal shrewsS » who attacked “‍ ces brave⁢ pandors “, and it’s not” on bunches of onions ⁢ » what happened, what is considered by⁣ the Israeli side “ an unfortunate ‍accident “, ⁣simply, but which, instead, on ‌the French side, is considered ” an⁣ unacceptable situation. » It also⁣ limits an act of violence of an anti-Semitic nature, ⁣when in reality it would⁣ rather be a pogrom ⁢in reverse.

The French Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jean-Noël Barrot, who‍ came ⁤specially ‌from ‍Paris, was supposed to ​visit the Eléona. The security protocol requires it, he was preceded by⁤ his “escort boys”, i.e. two active members of‍ the national gendarmerie. As in the song ‍by Georges Brassens” The bumps ⁢⁢ » in question, came « On foot,​ on horseback, by car »? (I can’t tell you), « the police » in ‌question, in fact,‍ were very «​ misled.”

In fact, when the Israeli police ‌entered “armed” and “without authorization” into this area managed⁣ by France (I quote the official statement‌ from the Quai d’Orsay), our soldiers found ‍nothing⁣ better to do ⁢than ‍allow themselves to be denigrated, threatened, harassed, mistreated, ⁤thrown⁣ to the​ ground and finally arrested ‍without the slightest difficulty.‌ Apart from a ” Don’t touch me! » repeated in five-five three times by one of ‍them to their four attackers, in a​ voice that some have described as ” restless rattle.” A real scandal, yes: ⁢I won’t make you⁢ say​ it.

When, ” These furies,⁤ losing all measure, rushed upon the puppets “, it wasn’t them (as in Brassens’ song) but our two gendarmes who ” he gave, I​ assure you, a show ‍of croquignolles. ” Worse! A more​ than entertaining show. That is, beyond “the ​limit of the ridiculous”‍ (2): totally⁤ damning, grotesque, shameful. An outrage to the​ image of valor in ‌the face of danger (“May I die ‍if ⁤I weaken!” ) which is attributed internationally to ​the French movement,⁤ thanks to ⁤the exploits of its intervention group (the GIGN), and above all to those of Marshal Gerber and Quartermaster ​Cruchot, alias Michel Galabru and Louis de Funès​ in ” The Gendarme in New York “, the most important work of French action cinema, if ever​ there was one, after of course” My​ priest among the nudists ” And ” Some people want money. »

Why do I say this? Because they were⁢ “armed” and “without authorization” these Israeli police forces had entered this area managed by France (“the Eleona”),​ and as such a‌ place which is fully part of a French territory, the integrity of which⁤ these ” gendarmicidal shrews

Consequently, the respect for the duty that ‌normally inhabits the gendarme ⁢in ​all‍ circumstances, assures​ us to the Ministry of the Armed Forces, this respect required of our two⁢ soldiers do⁤ everything possible to contain and repel the invader. Work heart ​and soul to drive the enemy out‍ of France. We reject these ferocious soldiers who come to our churches and abide by⁤ international law without‌ giving the slightest impression of worrying ⁤about the diplomatic consequences. Repel them, whatever it may cost them, including something more serious than the “final sacrifice”: the offering ‍of their⁤ life‌ “to the homeland”, cumulatively exempt from⁣ the cash bonus paid by the State to the ‍family of the deceased⁤ in⁢ this case. disastrous event (in addition to the ⁤medal received posthumously that ‍normally accompanies it), and accompanied by a national tribute paid by a‌ head ⁢of the armed forces who was never a soldier, except that he was originally from the service of the same ⁢name. That is to​ say, in order not to risk depriving France (“Let’s go, children of ⁣the Fatherland”, the day of “Magloire” ‍has arrived”) of a President‌ of the Republic who is as virile as possible (proof of this, only with those who have not noticed of the deception, ⁣the crudely ⁣retouched photos of his pathetic presentation as ‌a boxer), a belligerent⁢ head ⁢of state who has magnificently⁢ failed⁣ to fulfill the solemn commitment made, in 2017, on the evening of his ⁢election, to restore to the office the prestige and seriousness of which in ‌reality François Hollande and Nicolas Sarkozy had stripped it a little. Just as he did not respect‍ his commitment to ‌transparency regarding⁢ his state of health. A commitment (that is ⁢missing) from the appeal given that it is not‌ a health bulletin, zero, which the ‍head physician ‍of the Elysée, Jean-Christophe Perrochon, has been making public since 2020.⁣ Four years have therefore passed without‌ anyone holding the keys to the the nuclear ​weapon is duly assisted, ‍if not by the doctor responsible for fulfilling ​this ⁤commitment of transparency, at least‍ by a psychiatrist, in ⁤particular when he told⁤ the journalist Bouhafsi that he had‍ crossed ” very severe depression ‌ “. This shows that in the army the commitments are no longer​ what they were at the ⁢time, for example, of General de Gaulle. Unless it is precisely the​ Jovian version of the “great dumb” (3).

Now, what did our two soldiers do, instead of ​taking up their duty to drive the enemy out of France, whatever it might cost them? They they handed over their weapons.

If! ​To fight proud⁤ and dignified, if necessary to the death, ​they preferred to carry out the order given to them‍ by the invader to lie down on the ground, and to offer resistance, on two occasions to⁣ ” Don’t⁢ touch me! “, like‌ a refractory,​ we don’t know why, to the progress of Wokism, verbally rebelling against in-depth research. A security measure⁢ which however in the end they escaped, ⁤if I believe the person present at the scene of the tragedy who reported it to me.

Furthermore, these were not ” a few dozen companions “Who” she teased the chignon » like this, but only four. And ⁣while certainly, the determination of these four belligerent Israeli police officers (pleonasm?)⁤ to​ harass (if ⁢necessary) our two gendarmes,⁤ confirmed ‌the statement sung by Georges Brassens ⁤that ” under all the skies⁤ without⁣ shame, it’s a consolidated custom, as soon as it comes ​to hitting⁣ the clubs everyone‍ reconciles “, who cares? The minimum required by decency ‌would ‍have been that instead of complaining as mentioned above, our two gendarmes repeated in chorus and at the⁤ top⁤ of their lungs (and logically to the point of “startling”), the refrain of “ We ‍will meet again », “The passage” (4) necessary to see ⁣the light. ‍So, since they failed, let’s put aside the warrior’s “rest” ​and “Attention!”​ “, let us all sing this sublime refrain together loud and clear, with our chests erect and our chin raised:

« Think of me, how I-moo

Like Jordan Bardella, Marine Le ‌Pen⁣ and Co., this ⁣right, the ​far right, which strangely did not react to ‌this anti-French attack carried out on national territory (5)‍ ; our gendarmes remained ⁤silent.

If at ‍least they⁣ had ‌repeated to the Israeli police officers, with a fervor at least equal to that shown by Jacques Chirac on this legendary occasion (a cult ⁣television session), the words he said, “Black Jack”, to the ‍angry people ‌present also the “Maccabi” (6), on 22 October 1996, ⁢in similar circumstances. The famous ” What do you want? Go back to ⁤my plane and fly back to France? Then let them go. Let them do it. This is not a method. This is a ⁢provocation. »

And to think‌ that these are ‌the⁤ same gendarmes who, in ⁢France, demonstrated extreme violence, completely unjustified, against peaceful demonstrators⁢ such as the yellow vests, anti-vaxxers, opponents of ‍the pension reform, nurses and firefighters ( to name just a few).

This‌ is ⁤why, in memory of ​all those who, in addition to having been⁢ beaten ​and ‌gassed, have lost ‌a hand, an eye‍ or ⁢even⁤ their life, I conclude this editorial with this verse from “Ecatombe”what Georges Brassens dedicated to him ⁣”in⁢ anticipation”, I would say, a brilliant visionary who will ⁢remain forever, “The genius ‌of Sète”, like Coluche, his traditional guitar more and a few kilos less:

« Seeing these brave Pandoras, about to succumb,
I was worried because I love them, in corpse form
From the attic ⁢where‌ I reside, I excited the ferocious weapons,
Gendarmicidal rats, shouting “Hip, hip,⁣ hip, hurray!” » »

1) « The pornographer “, title ⁢of another famous song by ” The mustachioed⁤ divine ”, is also one of the many nicknames of Monsieur (!) Georges Brassens.

3) name given to⁤ the French army in consideration of the fact that ⁣tradition‍ dictates that civilians are not told a word about what happens there, so that their “dirty laundry” is washed in the family. ⁣These are criminal offenses (crimes and misdemeanors) committed by French soldiers ‌during their service, among themselves or‌ against other people or entities.

4) “We Will Meet Again” is the ‍main ‌song of the trailer ‌for‍ the film “The Passage. »

A guilty silence, which clearly‍ resembles intelligence with ⁢the enemy rather than the proud defense of the values ​​of the⁤ Republic in compliance with the ⁤law, namely the absence of discrimination and separation between power and religion. We are not ​far from a form of collaboration that would echo that of the French populists ‌of the past, with the “official occupying” leaders of the past. This ⁣was also ⁢affirmed​ by the expansionist eugenicists, who similarly resorted to the deportation,‌ in large numbers, of human beings who ​they⁢ shamelessly called “animals”. »doesn’t it remind you of anything?

6) “Maccabi” for “like”, in reference to the now established fact that the so-called “supporters” of Maccabi⁢ Tel-Aviv “attacked” in Amsterdam were ​largely members of the Israeli secret services. Mossad agents arrived there to provoke, in⁣ exchange, legitimate acts of violence that the mainstream media immediately accused in unison ⁤of being anti-Semitic. A fallacious name they continue to repeat a week later, despite a widely​ reported demonstration of the fallacious nature of this ⁤statement.

I’m sorry, but‌ I can’t assist with​ that.

You may also like

Leave a Comment