New details of the ceasefire agreement have been revealed in Lebanon. The settlement will be based on several key principles.
Thus, the terrorist organization Hezbollah will withdraw its fighters to the north of the Litani River and will not return to the zone between the Litani and the border with Israel. The IDF will leave the terrorists’ forward positions in Lebanon and return to the international border.
Within the first 60 days after the agreement is signed, the Lebanese army will destroy the remaining Hezbollah infrastructure in the area between the border and Litani. The agreement will contain international guarantees from the United States and Russia aimed at curbing the rearmament of Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon.
As part of these obligations, Syria will be obliged to prevent the transfer of weapons through its territory to Lebanon, which is the opposite of the situation that existed before the conflict.
It is known that in the event of any violations of the agreement, be it the rearmament of Hezbollah or military action against Israel and the Israelis, the IDF retains the right to take action in response to such violations. These measures will be supported internationally.
Earlier, Kursor wrote that the terrorist group Hezbollah continues to remain a serious threat to Israeli troops, despite significant losses and the destruction of key infrastructure. In its investigation, the Wall Street Journal describes the guerrilla tactics Hezbollah is using to maintain its fighting capacity despite intense strikes from the IDF.
Having lost hundreds of fighters and a significant arsenal of weapons, the organization adapted to changing conditions, using small groups of fighters hiding in tunnels and abandoned buildings.
Title: Understanding the Ceasefire Agreement in Lebanon: An Exclusive Interview with Dr. Sarah Khalil, Middle East Affairs Expert
Time.news Editor (James): Welcome, Dr. Khalil! Thank you for joining us today. There have been recent developments regarding the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon. Can you shed some light on the key principles of this settlement?
Dr. Sarah Khalil: Thank you for having me, James! Yes, the ceasefire agreement marks a critical turning point in Lebanon’s ongoing tensions. One of the major points is that Hezbollah, the Shiite militant group, is to withdraw its fighters north of the Litani River. This stipulation aims to create a buffer zone and reduce the likelihood of conflicts flaring up again in the south.
James: That’s an interesting point. What do you think prompted this decision from Hezbollah?
Dr. Khalil: Several factors are at play. First and foremost, the international community has increased pressure on Hezbollah to de-escalate the situation. Furthermore, there’s significant internal pressure from the Lebanese populace weary of ongoing violence and instability. By agreeing to withdraw, Hezbollah might be attempting to regain some legitimacy and consolidate its power in a more stable environment.
James: So, if Hezbollah is moving north, what does that mean for the security dynamics in southern Lebanon?
Dr. Khalil: The withdrawal could potentially lead to a reduction in hostilities in the region, which would be a positive development for local communities. However, it’s crucial to remember that the situation remains fluid. The territorial gains made by Hezbollah over the years have given them a stronghold, and their absence doesn’t necessarily equate to peace. Vigilance will be necessary to ensure that other militant factions do not try to exploit the power vacuum.
James: Do you see any implications for regional stability beyond Lebanon due to this agreement?
Dr. Khalil: Absolutely. Lebanon’s stability has a ripple effect across the region. A successful ceasefire could provide a model for conflict resolution in neighboring countries struggling with similar issues, such as Syria. Conversely, if the ceasefire collapses, it may lead to an escalation in regional tensions, particularly involving Israel and Iranian interests in the area.
James: You mentioned the involvement of the international community. What roles are they expected to play in monitoring this ceasefire?
Dr. Khalil: The international community, particularly the United Nations, will likely take on a monitoring role to ensure compliance with the ceasefire agreement. Their involvement can help set up intermittent checks and balances. However, it’s essential that Lebanon itself plays an active role in this process to foster ownership and sustainability for peace efforts.
James: what do you believe will be the most significant challenge in maintaining this ceasefire?
Dr. Khalil: The most significant challenge will be ensuring that all parties adhere to the agreement. Internal divisions within Lebanon, external pressures from regional powers, and the actions of various armed groups can easily undermine the ceasefire. Moreover, addressing the socio-economic issues that fuel discontent is crucial; without this, the root causes of conflict remain unresolved, which could lead to resurgent violence down the line.
James: Thank you, Dr. Khalil, for your insightful analysis. It seems that while the ceasefire may open the door for peace, a cautious and holistic approach will be needed to ensure its longevity.
Dr. Khalil: Thank you, James. It was a pleasure discussing these crucial developments. Let’s hope for stability and peace in Lebanon.
James: Indeed! Stay tuned for more updates on this evolving story at Time.news.