2024-01-05T15:09:48+00:00
+
Hassan Nasrallah said in his speech on the occasion of the one-week anniversary of the death of his executive assistant, former Lebanese MP Muhammad Hassan Yaghi, that “the Islamic resistance carried out more than 670 operations against Israel within 3 months,” noting that “48 sites were targeted.” border more than once.
He continued: “Since October 8, we have been engaged in fighting with the enemy in the south over a period of more than 100 km.”
Nasrallah added: “The Islamic Resistance carried out more than 670 operations within 3 months, and 48 border sites were targeted more than once, and the Islamic Resistance carried out 494 attacks, including 50 border points that were targeted more than once.”
He added: “The Islamic resistance also targeted the technical and intelligence equipment along the border and it was completely destroyed,” noting that “the Israeli soldiers then fled from the sites in the direction of the settlements, fearing that the resistance would advance towards the sites and occupy them.”
The Secretary-General of “Hezbollah” continued: ” large number of vehicles and tanks were destroyed along the border as well. The operations were very exhausting for the enemy, which exercised extreme secrecy about its heavy losses. The enemy does not acknowledge either the dead or the wounded, and this is part of its policies of general secrecy.” On his losses.
Hassan Nasrallah added: “Experts in the entity are talking about the enemy army’s losses being three times more than the announced numbers… In only 8 of the hospitals in the north, the statistics show that there are more than two thousand casualties… What is happening on the northern front is a real humiliation for the enemy army.” .
Nasrallah continued: “The displacement of the settlers in northern Israel will put pressure on the Israeli government… The goal of the Lebanese front is to pressure the Israeli government to stop the aggression against Gaza and reduce the burden on the Gaza Strip.”
Nasrallah added: “When the targeting in Lebanon is in the southern suburb, we cannot accept this major and dangerous breach (…) The killing of Sheikh Saleh l-rouri (a leader in Hamas) and his brothers in the southern suburb will definitely not be without response and punishment, and the decision is in the hands of the field.” .
He continued: If we remain silent about the killing of l-rouri, Lebanon will be exposed, and the response will inevitably come.
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Regional Security Expert
Time.news Editor: Welcome, Dr. Samir Khaled. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent developments surrounding Hezbollah and the ongoing tensions in the region.
Dr. Samir Khaled: Thank you for having me. It’s a critical time, and I’m glad to shed some light on the situation.
Editor: Recently, Hassan Nasrallah made headlines by claiming that the Islamic Resistance has conducted over 670 operations against Israel in the past three months. What do you make of these assertions?
Dr. Khaled: Nasrallah’s statements are significant not just for their quantity but also for their strategic implications. By claiming such a high number of operations, he aims to portray Hezbollah as an active and powerful force in the region. It serves to bolster the group’s image domestically and among its allies, reinforcing their narrative of resistance against Israel.
Editor: You mentioned strategic implications. Could you elaborate on how these announcements might change the dynamics on the ground?
Dr. Khaled: Absolutely. When a militant group like Hezbollah announces a large number of operations, it impacts both morale and strategy. On one hand, it can boost the morale of their supporters and fighters. On the other hand, it might provoke a stronger military response from Israel, which could escalate tensions further. We’ve seen this pattern before: increased rhetoric often leads to heightened military engagement.
Editor: Nasrallah also mentioned that the Islamic Resistance targeted 48 sites multiple times. How does this reflect on the operational capabilities of Hezbollah?
Dr. Khaled: Targeting the same sites repeatedly suggests a focus on disrupting specific Israeli capabilities or installations. This could indicate a level of intelligence and operational planning that Hezbollah has developed. However, it also runs the risk of drawing heavier Israeli retaliation if they perceive these attacks as a serious threat to their security infrastructure.
Editor: Given the claims about technical and intelligence equipment being destroyed, what does that signify about the nature of the conflict?
Dr. Khaled: It highlights a sophisticated conflict where both sides are not just engaging in traditional armed confrontations but also targeting each other’s technological and intelligence assets. This is a clear indication of modern warfare, where success is not only defined by ground troops but also by the ability to disrupt the enemy’s operational capacity behind the scenes.
Editor: You referred to Israel’s potential response. How do you think the Israeli military might react to these provocations?
Dr. Khaled: Israel typically responds with calculated force. They may increase airstrikes on Hezbollah positions or infrastructure in Lebanon. Israel is also likely to enhance its intelligence operations to preempt any further attacks. Their primary objective will be to deter Hezbollah while minimizing civilian casualties and international backlash.
Editor: Lastly, in this escalating rhetoric and action, what should the international community be mindful of?
Dr. Khaled: The international community must be vigilant. Escalation between Hezbollah and Israel could easily spill over into broader regional conflicts, impacting civilians and destabilizing neighboring countries. Diplomatic efforts should be intensified to prevent a miscalculation that could lead to larger-scale warfare.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Khaled, for your insights. It seems we are at a critical juncture in this ongoing conflict, and your expertise helps us understand the complex dynamics at play.
Dr. Khaled: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial to keep the dialogue open as these developments unfold.