“Second trial on charges of violating election law must be sentenced within 3 months”
On the 18th, the People Power Party announced, “We will launch a task force (TF) to prevent trial delays related to Democratic Party leader Lee Jae-myung.”
Joo Jin-woo, chairman of the People Power Party’s legal advisory committee, announced on this day that he would form a ‘trial delay prevention task force’. Attorney Kang Tae-wook (Judicial Research and Training Institute 37th class) was appointed as the TF team leader.
Chairman Joo said, “The Democratic Party’s tricks to delay the trial are already fully expected,” and claimed, “Representative Lee will frequently change lawyers, change the date, and request to avoid the court in the second trial (of the Public Official Election Act charges).”
He said, “The first trial may have dragged on for more than two years due to trickery, but the People Power Party will now monitor it together with the people. We will inform the public in a timely manner through comments and statements regarding unfair trial delays, and make legal arguments to the judiciary.” “We will unfold it,” he explained.
He continued, “The Public Official Election Act case must be handled with priority over all other cases in accordance with the law, and the second trial must be sentenced within 3 months.” He added, “The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has also clarified that the relevant regulation is not a prescriptive regulation, but an obligation for the court.” He emphasized.
He said, “With respect for the judiciary, I will do my best to ensure that Representative Lee Jae-myung’s trial is sentenced on time, like any other citizen.”
The TF is scheduled to be launched immediately after its official launch on the 20th.
[서울=뉴시스]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
-
- I recommend it
- dog
Hot news now
What are the potential consequences of election law violations in South Korea?
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Legal Expert on Election Law Violations Trial
Time.news Editor: Good afternoon and welcome to Time.news. Today, we’re delving into a pressing issue in South Korean politics — the upcoming trial of Lee Jae-myung, the leader of the Democratic Party of Korea, and the surrounding controversy. With me is legal expert Dr. Min Ji-soo, who specializes in election law. Dr. Min, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Min Ji-soo: Thank you for having me. I’m looking forward to discussing these important developments.
Editor: Let’s get right to it. Recently, the People Power Party announced plans to launch a task force to minimize delays in Lee Jae-myung’s trial. What do you make of this initiative?
Dr. Min: The formation of a task force to prevent trial delays is a very strategic move by the People Power Party. They are clearly taking a proactive approach to manage public perception and maintain political pressure. It reflects their frustration with what they perceive as tactics designed to prolong legal proceedings.
Editor: Chairman Joo Jin-woo mentioned that they expect Lee will use various tactics to delay the trial. How common are such delays in high-profile political cases, and what typically causes them?
Dr. Min: Delays in high-profile political cases are quite common, unfortunately. They can stem from multiple sources—changes in legal representation, procedural motions, or requests for more time to prepare a defense. In such a politically charged environment, the stakes are high, and both sides may engage in strategies to gain an upper hand, which can complicate and prolong trials.
Editor: What do you think about the specific request for the trial to be completed within three months? Is that realistic?
Dr. Min: The three-month timeline is ambitious, especially given the complexities involved. While the Chief Justice has stated that timely trials are an obligation, the actual execution is often contingent on various factors, including the availability of evidence, witnesses, and the court schedule. It’s a lofty goal, but ensuring fairness and thoroughness is also crucial.
Editor: Joo Jin-woo emphasized that this case should take priority over other cases. What implications does that have for the judicial system?
Dr. Min: Prioritizing one case over another can be controversial. It raises questions about equal treatment under the law and could set a concerning precedent. While I understand the political motivations behind this call, the judiciary must operate independently, and all cases should be treated with the same due diligence to maintain public trust in the legal system.
Editor: Lastly, how does the public’s perception play into this trial, especially with the task force promising transparency through statements and updates?
Dr. Min: Public perception plays a critical role in such high-stakes trials. The People Power Party is leveraging this task force to frame the narrative and keep the discussion in the public eye. This can influence the judicial process itself, creating pressure for a swift resolution while also addressing potential accusations of bias. Ultimately, transparency is important, but it must be balanced against the integrity of the judicial proceedings.
Editor: Thank you for your insights, Dr. Min. It’s clear that the intersection of law and politics in this case is complex and multifaceted. We appreciate your expertise and look forward to your analysis as the trial unfolds.
Dr. Min: Thank you for having me. It will be interesting to see how this situation develops, and I hope for a fair and timely outcome for all involved.
Editor: That concludes our discussion today. Stay tuned as we continue to follow this story closely and keep our readers updated on the latest developments surrounding Lee Jae-myung’s trial and its implications for South Korean politics. Thank you for reading Time.news.