“The Netherlands considers the autonomy plan, presented by Morocco in 2007, as a very serious and credible contribution to the political process led by the United Nations”, to resolve the conflict around the Sahara, declared to the press Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp.
Stressing “the importance of regional stability”, Mr. Veldkamp renewed his country’s position in support of the efforts of the Personal Envoy of the United Nations Secretary-General for the Sahara, Staffan de Mistura, to “pursue a political process aimed at achieving a just, lasting and mutually acceptable political solution in accordance with the resolutions of the UN Security Council and the principles set out in the Charter of the United Nations”.
The minister also welcomed the “very solid and very broad” relations with Morocco, which cover a large number of subjects ranging from trade to security, and from the fight against terrorism to the migration issue.
Morocco’s role as a “very stable partner in the region is crucial in this regard,” said the head of Dutch diplomacy, adding that his country appreciates the “strategic partnership” with Morocco, and is delighted to “see this cooperation will deepen and expand even more in the future”.
Mr. Veldkamp stressed that relations between the two countries are part of a broader context between the Kingdom and the European Union, affirming that “Morocco is a very important neighbor of Europe”.
What role does historical context play in shaping current journalism practices?
Title: The Future of Time in Journalism: An Interview with Dr. Emily Carter, Temporal Studies Expert
[Scene: A cozy, modern studio filled with books on history, science, and journalism. The Time.news editor, Mark Thompson, sits across from Dr. Emily Carter, a renowned temporal studies expert. Soft lighting casts a warm glow as they prepare to delve into a fascinating conversation about the role of time in journalism.]
Mark Thompson (MT): Welcome, Dr. Carter! It’s a pleasure to have you here today. Your expertise in temporal studies offers a unique perspective on our ever-evolving field of journalism.
Dr. Emily Carter (EC): Thank you, Mark! I’m excited to be here. The intersection of time and journalism is incredibly intriguing, especially as we navigate the fast-paced digital age.
MT: Absolutely. Let’s start with the concept of ‘news cycles.’ In an era where information is instant, how do you see the traditional news cycle evolving?
EC: That’s a great question. Traditional news cycles, which once spanned daily or weekly intervals, have transformed into real-time updates. Social media plays a significant role in this shift, often leading to a 24-hour news culture. The challenge is that, while we can report instantly, the depth and accuracy of reporting sometimes suffer.
MT: Right, the pressure for immediacy can lead to rushed stories. How do you think journalists can balance speed with the need for thoroughness?
EC: A deliberate approach is essential. Journalists should embrace what I call ‘temporal mindfulness’—being aware of the context and timing of their reporting. It’s important to ask: “What’s the long-term significance of this story?” rather than just racing to be first.
MT: I like that term—temporal mindfulness. In your opinion, how can journalists ensure they remain relevant in a landscape where many people rely on bite-sized information?
EC: Relevance in journalism today hinges on storytelling. Journalists should focus on providing deeper insights and context that transcend the immediacy. Creating narratives that connect past events with present issues helps readers and viewers understand not just what is happening, but why it matters.
MT: So, you’re saying the historical context is vital for understanding current news events. How can journalists incorporate that perspective into their reporting?
EC: Absolutely. They can use historical parallels, analyze trends over time, and highlight how previous events have shaped current realities. For instance, when covering elections, journalists can explore historical voter turnout, the evolution of party platforms, and past civic engagement to provide more comprehensive insights.
MT: Interesting approach! Speaking of the past and future, how do you envision time journalism evolving in the next ten years?
EC: I foresee a more collaborative relationship between journalists and historians, as well as data scientists. Technology will allow us to analyze vast amounts of historical data, revealing patterns that inform contemporary storytelling. We might even see timelines integrated into news articles, allowing readers to experience information dynamically.
MT: That sounds promising! As we draw closer to the end of our conversation, what one piece of advice would you give to aspiring journalists about incorporating the concept of time into their work?
EC: Stay curious about the timelines behind every story. When you write, think not just about today but also about tomorrow and yesterday. Engage with historical context and consider how your reporting can contribute to a broader understanding of events over time. It’s about building a narrative that respects the past while informing the future.
MT: Thank you, Dr. Carter! Your insights on the significance of time in journalism are invaluable. I can’t wait to see how this conversation will inspire our readers.
EC: Thank you, Mark! It has been a delightful discussion. I’m looking forward to what the future holds for journalism and storytelling.
[Scene ends with Mark and Dr. Carter sharing a warm smile as they leave the studio, illuminated by the potential of their enlightening conversation.]