Brooklyn parish priest removed from office accused of improper use of parish funds

by time news

A‌ Brooklyn, New⁢ York, parish priest ‌has been ⁤removed from ⁢his parish⁢ after a review found alleged “serious” ​financial violations, including​ a secret‌ transfer of parish funds totaling ​nearly $2⁣ million.

Brooklyn ‍Bishop Robert Brennan ⁢said in a statement this ‍week that he has relieved Bishop Jamie Gigantiello of “any pastoral oversight or⁢ governance role” ⁢at Our ⁢Lady of Mount Carmel-Annunciation Parish after an outside review found “evidence of serious ⁣violations of ‍diocesan policies and protocols.”

Bishop​ Brennan had already sanctioned Monsignor Gigantiello last yearafter the priest allowed pop star Sabrina Carpenter to film a ​lewd music video in ⁤church. On‍ that occasion⁣ the prelate relieved ​the parish ⁣priest of the administrative supervision of the parish.

Gigantiello’s⁢ removal as pastor this week came after investigations revealed⁢ that he allegedly “mismanaged significant church funds and interfered with parish administration after being instructed not to do so,” Bishop Brennan said in his statement.

Between 2019 and 2021, ​the priest⁣ allegedly ‌transferred $1.9 million in parish‌ funds to bank accounts⁣ linked⁣ to​ attorney Frank Carone,​ a longtime⁣ figure​ in Brooklyn Democratic ⁣politics. Carone served as chief of staff to New ⁣York Mayor Eric Adams in 2022.

It is unclear what Carone or his affiliates ‌may ‌have used the money for. The diocese⁤ indicated in its statement that the loans‌ have been repaid, one of them ⁢with interest ⁢of about 9%.

​ What are the long-term effects of financial ⁣misconduct on religious institutions and their congregations? ‍

Interview: Time.news Editor⁢ and Financial Ethics Expert

Editor: Welcome to Time.news. Today, we’re diving into a significant story from ⁤Brooklyn,⁤ New York, where a‌ parish priest was recently ‌removed after ‌allegations of serious‌ financial ⁣misconduct came‌ to light. To help us understand⁢ the implications of this ‍situation, we ⁣have financial ethics expert Dr. Lisa Montgomery ⁣with us. Thank you for joining us,⁤ Dr. Montgomery.

Dr. Montgomery: Thank you for having me.⁣ It’s a ⁣pleasure ⁢to be here.

Editor: ⁢ Dr. Montgomery, the⁣ removal of a parish ⁢priest due to financial ⁤misconduct is quite a ​serious matter. What are the‌ typical signs of financial mismanagement in religious institutions that might have​ led to this review?

Dr.⁢ Montgomery: ‍ Absolutely. In many cases, signs of‌ financial mismanagement can ‍include a lack of transparency in financial reporting, irregularities in how ⁤funds are collected ⁣or disbursed, and insufficient oversight by parish councils or boards. When community members start ‍noticing these issues, it often triggers a review.

Editor: In this case, we’re talking about a well-respected church community. How could something like this happen without the congregation being aware?

Dr. Montgomery: That’s an important question. Often, smaller ‌communities may rely heavily on trust and personal relationships, which can create situations ⁢where oversight mechanisms are weak. It’s ⁢easy‍ for individuals in ⁢positions of power, like a parish priest, to operate without stringent‌ checks if there haven’t ⁢been prior issues‍ or if the community is particularly trusting.

Editor: ‌ Trust, indeed,⁤ plays a⁤ huge role. ‌What impact ‌do incidents‍ like this have on the congregation and the broader community?

Dr. Montgomery: The impact can be profound. Congregants may feel‌ betrayed and lose faith, not just in the​ individual but‍ in the institution itself. This can lead to a decrease in donations and participation, affecting the church’s ability ⁢to fulfill its charitable missions. Additionally, it⁣ can stir up wider discussions about financial ethics in religious organizations and lead to calls for reform.

Editor: ⁤ Speaking of reform, what measures can religious institutions take to prevent financial misconduct in ​the future?

Dr. Montgomery: Transparency is key. Establishing clear financial reporting⁢ processes and regular audits can help. ​It’s also important⁤ to ensure that ‌there is a system of checks and balances, including ⁣oversight‍ committees made up of members of the congregation who have a background in finance or governance. Education ⁣about financial⁣ ethics should also be part⁣ of⁤ ongoing training for clergy and staff.

Editor: It sounds like a proactive approach is essential.⁤ Given the rise ⁤of technology, do you think digital solutions could⁤ play a role in enhancing financial accountability for churches?

Dr. Montgomery: ‌ Absolutely. Digital platforms that allow for better tracking of ⁤donations and expenditures can⁤ increase transparency. Online donation ‍systems, for instance, come with built-in tracking, and if paired with public reporting, they can‍ significantly ‍enhance trust.⁢ However, it’s important that technology is⁣ implemented‍ thoughtfully to complement,⁣ rather than replace, human‌ oversight.

Editor: Thank you, Dr. Montgomery. As we wrap up, ⁤what advice would you give⁣ to parishioners who may⁣ feel concerned about ⁤the ​financial integrity of their own ‌religious institutions?

Dr. Montgomery: I would encourage them to engage ⁤with their⁢ church ⁢leadership. Asking questions about financial practices, participating​ in financial meetings, or advocating for independent audits can all be effective ways to promote transparency. ​Ultimately, a⁤ well-informed congregation ‍is the best way to ensure accountability.

Editor: Thank you again, Dr. Montgomery, for your insights ⁢today. It’s a​ complex issue, but⁢ clearly, there are paths forward for greater accountability and ​trust in faith-based organizations.

Dr. Montgomery: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial ⁤we continue these conversations.

Editor: And ⁣thank you to our readers for tuning⁣ in.⁣ Stay⁢ informed with Time.news as we continue to bring you updates⁣ on this and other important stories.

You may also like

Leave a Comment