There were deaf ears, says the Inai regarding the discussion of his disappearance

by times news cr

The⁢ commissioners of Henna They pointed out that they were hostages to political decisions ⁢and ‌accused that⁢ there were deaf ears ​to the alerts due to the serious setback that ​the‍ disappearance of the transparency body means.

The commissioner Norma Julieta del Río Venegas reiterated that one of the concerns that have been expressed falls on the National Transparency Platform and its 14 thousand 972 million ⁢940 thousand‌ 509 records it contains. “This ⁣is equivalent to ‌a world of data 40 times the databases of the General Archive of the Nation“This represents 16.5 terabytes​ of ‌information contained in the technological tool, which has been built ​since 2016 by all Mexicans, by all the obligated subjects of this ⁢country.”

At the same time, “the doubt persists as to who is going to protect the information on the Platform, because it is not only⁤ the Portal Systemthere are​ 10⁣ million​ requests ‍and the requests for⁣ information contain personal data ​that cannot be delivered as‍ if a handkerchief were delivered, because we ourselves would be violating the ⁤personal data of 10 million Mexicans.”

For its part, Adrian Alcalá MendezCommissioner President of the Institute National Transparency, Access to ‌Information ‌and Protection of Personal Data (INAI), asserted that “any attempt ⁢to extinguish it represents in⁢ fact a serious setback in the advances that as a Mexican society we have built in the area of ​​transparency and protection of personal data.”

The commissioner Blanca Lilia Ibarra Cadena He asserted that “approving the disappearance⁣ of this Institute would entail a serious setback for ​Mexico when for more than two decades a ⁢model with a high guarantee component has been promoted to make ‌possible the exercise and ⁢protection of the rights to access information and data protection.” personal”.

In turn, Josefina Roman Vergara stated that “we will continue focused on guaranteeing that the rights of Mexicans continue to ​be protected and hopefully together we can build ⁢a more solid rule of law that guarantees the youngest human right recognized in the Constitution, which is the right to privacy ⁤and the protection⁤ of personal data.”

What are the ‌key challenges faced by the National Transparency Platform in Mexico?

Interview ‌between Time.news Editor ⁢and Expert on Transparency and Data ‌Management

Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome to today’s interview! We’re diving into the current issues surrounding the ⁤National ⁢Transparency Platform in⁤ Mexico. ‍Joining us is Dr. Elena Castillo, ​an expert ‌in transparency⁢ and‍ data governance.‍ Thank‌ you⁢ for being here, Dr. Castillo.

Dr. Elena Castillo ​(DEC): Thank ‌you for having me. I’m excited to discuss ‍these important topics.

TNE: Let’s ‌start with the concerns ​raised by⁢ the commissioners ‍in Henna. They described themselves ⁣as hostages to political ⁢decisions. How does this situation impact the effectiveness of the National ⁤Transparency Platform?

DEC: That’s a critical point. When political decisions overshadow independent bodies,​ it can⁤ create‍ a ⁤significant risk to transparency ⁢and accountability. The ‍Henna commissioners are right⁣ to express their concerns. A transparency platform is only effective if​ it operates ⁤independently⁢ and⁢ is supported ⁣by a commitment‌ to uphold data integrity and accessibility.

TNE: They mentioned the ⁣staggering amount of data stored on the ‌National Transparency Platform—over 14 thousand million records. What ‍does that ‍volume of data signify in terms of ⁣transparency?

DEC: ‌The scale of data on the National‌ Transparency‍ Platform is impressive and crucial for public accountability. With ‍16.5 terabytes of ‍information, the platform has the potential to empower citizens and enable‍ oversight of government actions. However, such⁢ a vast amount of data also ‍demands robust mechanisms for protection ⁤and retrieval. This is where the questions about data security⁤ become paramount.

TNE: Speaking of security, there are concerns about who‍ will protect this information. What measures should be implemented to ensure the​ data remains safe ⁤and accessible?

DEC: First and foremost, there needs⁤ to⁢ be a clear and transparent data governance ‍framework. This‌ includes strict access controls and encryption ​to prevent unauthorized access. ​Additionally, regular audits and ​updates of the platform are essential to ensure it⁢ is not ⁣vulnerable to breaches. Importantly, involving civil ‌society in oversight can ⁤promote trust and accountability.

TNE: The mention of “deaf ears” to the alerts about setbacks implies⁣ a lack ⁣of response from ⁢leadership. What role⁣ does political will play in maintaining and improving transparency platforms?

DEC: Political will is absolutely essential. ‍Without it, ‍initiatives such as the National Transparency Platform can falter. When political ⁣leaders prioritize transparency and⁣ support these ​initiatives with resources‌ and legislative backing, they create an environment⁤ where data governance can thrive. Conversely, neglect ​can lead to‍ deterioration in public trust and ⁣diminished citizen‌ engagement.

TNE: In your opinion, what steps⁢ could be taken to reinvigorate​ trust in the National Transparency Platform and​ other similar initiatives?

DEC: Reinforcing public engagement is crucial. ⁣There should be educational campaigns‍ about the ‍importance of transparency⁢ and⁢ how the​ data can be​ used constructively. Establishing feedback mechanisms for citizens to‌ voice their concerns directly can‍ significantly‍ help ‍too. Lastly, creating collaborations between government, academia, and civil ⁢society could help foster a culture of transparency and ‌mutual⁢ accountability.

TNE: ⁤ There’s‌ much at stake here for Mexican citizens. ⁤It seems like⁣ a collaborative effort ⁣will be key to ‍safeguarding these democratic tools. Any final thoughts on what might happen if these issues go unaddressed?

DEC: ⁤If we fail to address⁣ these issues, we risk​ eroding ​the very foundations of democratic governance. Citizens could feel‌ disenfranchised, and public accountability may dwindle.⁢ It’s crucial ‍to act swiftly and⁣ decisively to preserve the integrity of the transparency framework ‌and build a resilient system ‍that serves everyone.

TNE: Thank you, Dr. Castillo, ⁤for your​ insights ​on ​this⁢ pressing ​issue. We hope to see progress in transparency ‌governance in the near⁤ future.

DEC: Thank you! ‍I share‌ that hope, and I appreciate the opportunity to discuss ⁤these vital concerns.

TNE: ‍ And thank you to our viewers for tuning in. Stay informed, and let’s ‍continue the conversation about the importance of transparency in our societies.

You may also like

Leave a Comment