Tottenham appeals against Bentancur’s ban for ‘racism against Son Heung-min’

by times news cr

Bentancur receives 7-match ban from FA

ⓒNewsis

Tottenham Hotspur of the⁢ English Professional Football Premier League (EPL) raised an objection to the disciplinary action received by Rodrigo Bentancur (27) ‌for making racist remarks⁣ to captain Son Heung-min (32).

Tottenham announced on ​its official website on⁣ the 20th (Korean time), “We have filed ⁤an appeal⁤ against ​the decision‍ of the​ English⁤ Football Association (FA) to suspend‌ Bentancur⁤ from ⁤playing earlier this week.”

Tottenham understands the⁣ problem of Bentancur’s racist remarks,⁢ but ‍Tottenham’s position​ is that the level⁤ of disciplinary action is too severe.

Bentancur was banned from ​playing seven league​ games and fined ​100,000 pounds (176.5 million won) ⁤by the FA on the⁣ 18th‍ for making racist remarks toward Son Heung-min.

Even if Tottenham⁣ files an appeal, Bentancur’s ban will remain in place during the reconsideration ⁢period, and Tottenham will ‍not comment further on⁤ the matter⁣ in the meantime.

Meanwhile, Uruguayan-born Tottenham midfielder Bentancur​ appeared ‍on his country’s TV program last July, and when asked by the​ host to ‘get Son Heung-min’s uniform’, he responded, “Even if I brought him Son Heung-min’s​ cousin’s uniform, he wouldn’t know. Son Heung-min and his cousin both look the same,” he ‍said, sparking controversy.

It was a racist remark‍ that all​ Asians looked alike.

As‍ criticism towards Bentancur intensified, ⁣Son Heung-min said,⁣ “He sent me a long message and I could feel his ⁤sincerity,” and⁢ added, “I love Bentancur. He also defended‌ him, saying, “We have a lot of good memories.”

Tottenham coach ‌Anzhi Postekoglou ‌also said on ‍the 15th, “Son Heung-min and Bentancur talked to each⁢ other. “Bentancur has already apologized for his remarks, and ⁢Son Heung-min has also accepted his colleague’s ⁣mistake,” he said, adding, “We must give him a chance to atone and let him learn.”

Bentancur is playing as a ⁢key ​midfielder‍ for Tottenham this⁢ season. If he is ⁣disciplined,‌ Tottenham will suffer a major blow.

Tottenham is facing a tight schedule that​ requires not only⁢ the English professional football Premier League (EPL), but⁢ also the 2024-2025 season UEFA⁣ Europa ⁢League (UEL).

As ⁤Tottenham has ‍currently fallen⁤ to 10th place in the league with 5 wins, ⁢1 draw, and 5 losses (16 points) in 11 EPL games, the departure of a key player is expected to‌ be fatal to the team’s management.

[서울=뉴시스]

  • Hot news now

    What are the implications of⁢ the FA’s seven-match ban on players involved in racist remarks?

    Interview between Time.news Editor and Football Ethics ​Expert

    Time.news Editor: Good afternoon, everyone. ⁢Today we’re discussing a contentious topic that has made headlines recently—the seven-match⁢ ban imposed on Tottenham Hotspur midfielder Rodrigo Bentancur for making racist ​remarks towards his teammate Son Heung-min.‌ Joining us is Dr. Alex Ramirez, a renowned ⁣expert in sports ethics and racial⁤ issues ‍in football. Welcome, Dr. Ramirez.

    Dr. Alex Ramirez: Thank ⁢you for having me. It’s a crucial issue that merits​ serious⁤ discussion.

    Editor:‍ Indeed. Let’s start with the specifics‌ of this incident.⁣ Bentancur made a remark during a​ TV interview⁢ suggesting that Son and his cousin looked alike. This comment was perceived as racist, leading to a significant penalty. What are ⁣your thoughts on the FA’s decision ​to impose such a harsh ban?

    Dr. Ramirez: It was a stern decision, but ​not surprising given ⁤the current climate surrounding racism in sports. Football, as a global sport, has a​ responsibility to ​combat racism decisively. The FA’s seven-match ban signifies that racism will not ⁣be tolerated, and it sets⁤ precedent for how similar cases might be handled in ⁣the future.

    Editor: Tottenham has appealed the decision, stating⁣ that while they acknowledge the severity of the‍ remarks, the punishment is excessive. What do​ you think their argument hinges on?

    Dr. ‍Ramirez: Tottenham’s argument seems to focus on the​ proportionality of the punishment. They might contend that while ⁣Bentancur’s comments​ were inappropriate, his subsequent⁣ apology and Son’s acceptance of it should be factored into the‍ decision. There’s⁢ a delicate ⁢balance⁢ between accountability and allowing room for ‌personal​ growth. However, it’s also ​important to ⁤recognise that disciplinary actions​ often⁣ serve‍ as a broader message to the football community.

    Editor: That makes sense. Interestingly, despite the controversy, Son‍ Heung-min has publicly⁢ defended Bentancur,⁢ stating, “He sent ‍me⁤ a long​ message and I⁣ could feel his sincerity.” How do you interpret ⁤Son’s behavior ‍in this ​scenario?

    Dr. Ramirez: ⁣Son’s defense of Bentancur​ demonstrates ⁤an ​aspect of team solidarity and perhaps also highlights the complexities ⁣of interpersonal relationships in sports. It’s not uncommon for​ teammates​ to ​forgive one​ another, and it ⁢reflects ​a deeper understanding of the​ dynamics at play. However, it’s essential to remember that forgiveness does not absolve⁣ one‌ from consequence. Son’s actions also ⁣humanize ⁢the incident, ‍showing ‍that while mistakes ​can ​happen, they⁢ should not be ⁤overlooked⁤ in terms of their ⁤impact.

    Editor: That’s​ an insightful perspective.⁤ With Bentancur being a key player for Tottenham, how might his ‌absence impact the team, especially‌ given their⁣ current struggle in the league?

    Dr. Ramirez: ⁢Bentancur’s ban couldn’t come at a ⁢worse time for Tottenham, who are already‍ facing challenges in​ the league. Losing​ a central figure ‍like​ him for seven matches ⁢could ⁢severely affect their performance.⁤ This not only highlights the immediate‍ impact on the pitch but also raises questions about how teams manage player behavior and its repercussions. If a team⁣ is to​ succeed, it ‌requires stability ​from all its members, and ‌disciplinary issues can disrupt ‍that stability.

    Editor: Definitely. The conversation around racism ⁤in football has ⁤gained momentum recently, with more ‍athletes speaking out and organizations taking a stand. Do you believe this incident will lead to ‌more stringent measures in the future?

    Dr. Ramirez: I certainly hope so. Incidents like these often catalyze change. While the FA’s decision might be viewed as harsh by some, it sends a message that all players must be held‍ to a standard of behavior ⁣that is respectful and inclusive. We are witnessing a pivotal moment in football where the emphasis ‍on racial equality‍ is increasingly becoming non-negotiable, and that bodes well for the future of the sport.

    Editor: Thank you, Dr. Ramirez, for your insights into⁤ such a​ pressing issue. It’s vital ‍that we ​continue this⁢ dialog as we navigate complex realities within sports.

    Dr. Ramirez: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial⁤ we keep ⁣discussing​ these issues to ⁢foster a more inclusive ‌environment in football ⁣and beyond.

    Editor: And thank you to our audience for⁣ tuning in. This has been an engaging conversation,‍ and we hope to keep you updated on this evolving story.

    You may also like

    Leave a Comment