Reduced reimbursements: chronic diseases and some drugs are not affected, assures the Minister of Health

by time news

All medications, except those “100% covered by health‍ insurance.” The reduction in reimbursements for medical visits and medicines sought by the government to save ⁤money will not ‍affect all French people, the Minister of Health, Geneviève ‌Darrieussecq, assured on Thursday. RTL.

This ⁢week, the minister announced a 5% reduction in the Social Security reimbursement‍ rate⁣ for medicines‌ for next year,​ as well as ​in the coverage of medical visits.

“This concerns all drugs, except those which today are⁣ covered 100% by health insurance,” he explained to RTL. “These‌ are, in fact, very expensive drugs, very often reserved for serious ⁢diseases, often even innovative drugs,” such‌ as cancer treatments, he said.

Likewise, the least reimbursed consultations “will not affect all French ​people”. “This means that the 13 million long-term sick French people will continue to have ⁣free treatment and medicines,” assured Geneviève Darrieussecq.

Other ways of saving studied

For others, supplementary health insurers have already warned that these transfers will lead to⁤ an increase in contributions ⁢required from insured people. “I ask‌ them (the mutuals, ed.) to find an acceptable balance so that we can simply continue‍ to protect ‍the French,” said the minister.

Another ​economic route, mentioned on​ Thursday in Le Parisien by the Minister of Economy, Antoine Armand: the tightening of the rules‍ for medical transport by taxi, which costs health insurance 3 billion a year. “I think that​ here too we need ​to be rational, that we can organize a shared trip, for example, an‍ agreement” with health insurance, estimated the minister, referring to a “vertiginous increase”‍ in these ‌expenses.

When asked about the risks of drug shortages, which are worsening year after year in the country, Geneviève Darrieussecq‌ recalled that measures have been adopted “to try ‍to limit them”. ‌”We are⁤ doing everything⁤ we can to ensure there ​aren’t any,” he assured, without being ​able to promise.

– What are ‍the implications of the⁣ French ‍government’s ‌decision to reduce​ reimbursement rates for medications on patient healthcare access?

Interview between Time.news Editor and Health Expert

Editor: Good morning and‌ welcome to Time.news. Today, ​we’re diving into the recent announcement by the​ French⁤ Minister of Health, Geneviève Darrieussecq, regarding a significant change ⁤in‌ the reimbursement rates for medications and medical visits. Joining us is Dr. Julien⁣ Martin, a healthcare policy expert. Thank you for‌ being ‌here, Dr. Martin.

Dr. ⁤Martin: Good morning!⁤ Thank you for having me.

Editor: Let’s get straight to the point. The government has announced a 5% ​reduction in​ reimbursement rates for medications and medical consultations. What do you​ make ​of this decision?

Dr. Martin: Well, it certainly⁢ raises concerns. The reduction is aimed at saving money, but it could have significant implications for patients, especially those who rely on regular medications. While the government states ​that this will not impact all French people, those‍ who are affected will likely face higher out-of-pocket expenses.

Editor: The minister did mention that ​this reduction ⁢applies to all drugs except those covered⁢ 100% by health insurance, primarily expensive and innovative ‍treatments for serious conditions. How ​do you interpret this exemption?

Dr. Martin: That’s ⁢an interesting point. The exemption​ for high-cost drugs reflects ‌a prioritization of⁤ severe health issues, which ⁢is ⁢understandable. However,⁤ one must consider the larger picture; patients with chronic, less severe conditions still require support and medications to manage their health.⁢ A ‍5% cut can add up significantly for them ⁢over time.

Editor: Indeed,⁣ that raises a valid‌ concern. The minister described the changes as a necessary step for ‍the government to save money. Do you believe there are alternative‍ ways for the government to achieve savings‍ without impacting patient care?

Dr. Martin: Absolutely. The government could look into negotiating ​better prices with pharmaceutical companies, investing in preventive care, or enhancing telemedicine services, which can⁤ reduce‌ the burden on physical ‌consultations.⁣ All of these potential strategies could help save costs without sacrificing accessibility or quality of care for patients.

Editor: It sounds like a multi-faceted‍ approach is needed. Regarding the consultation reimbursements, the ⁣minister hinted at similar reductions. How could this affect access to healthcare services for the average citizen?

Dr. ‍Martin: If patients have to pay more out of pocket ⁢for ​consultations, this might deter them from seeking​ necessary care. Many individuals already struggle to afford healthcare, and any additional ‌financial hurdle can exacerbate health inequities. Early intervention is crucial for better health outcomes, so this could be a counterproductive move for public health in the long run.

Editor: It ‍seems like ‍a delicate‍ balance between ‌fiscal⁣ responsibility and ensuring public health. How​ can policymakers ⁤ensure that ⁤financial decisions don’t compromise ‍care?

Dr. Martin: Policymakers need⁣ to engage healthcare professionals and patients in discussions about these changes. Transparency regarding the reasons ​for ⁤cuts and involving stakeholders in crafting solutions can ‍lead to more informed decisions. Ultimately, the goal ‌should be sustainable​ healthcare that doesn’t compromise access​ or quality.

Editor: That’s an insightful ⁢perspective. As we‌ look ahead, what do you⁤ foresee as the potential outcomes of these changes in reimbursement rates?

Dr. Martin: If the government moves forward with these cuts without safeguards, we could see an increase in patients neglecting medications or delaying consultations, potentially leading to greater health ‌problems down the line. On the flip ⁢side, if managed thoughtfully, these changes could push for a more ⁣efficient healthcare system, but that‌ will require rigorous oversight and a commitment to patient care.

Editor: ⁢ Thank you, Dr. Martin, for your valuable insights on this important issue. It’s clear that while financial measures are necessary, we must ‌keep patient well-being‍ at the forefront of any healthcare ‌policy decisions.

Dr. Martin: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial for ⁤us to engage in these discussions, and⁣ I appreciate the opportunity to ⁣share my thoughts.

Editor: And thank you to ‌our viewers for joining us for this important conversation on healthcare⁢ policy in France.

You may also like

Leave a Comment