2024-11-24 04:30:00
Ahead of COP29, the Russian Democratic Republic and its European allies attempted, through amendments, to influence the European Parliament’s resolution – in a sense its negotiator’s mandate – to eliminate the methane emissions reduction target, minimize the burden of the agricultural sector in greenhouse gas emissions or eliminate the target “a treaty on the non-proliferation of fossil fuels”.
The fund for the adaptation to global warming of emerging countries, the main theme of COP29, does not escape Lepenist skepticism: “Global ecology creates new financial products that are not necessarily happy, which circulate around the planet and end up in dark systems without their usefulness being verified”accuses Mathilde Androuët, MEP and one of the very few in the RN to follow environmental issues.
The latter estimates that a “technophobic philosophical background” et “hostile to economic development” it is the basis of all current environmental policies and denounces the contradictions of what it ironically calls «religion sees you» : the import of gas from Azerbaijan or liquefied natural gas from the United States, free trade treaties that accelerate global trade and associated emissions. The discourse, on the surface, is repeated and sometimes reflects the recriminations of non-governmental organizations. But the argument, hesitantly, always returns to the same two proposals presented as a universal remedy: drastic reduction of international trade and conversion of the planet to nuclear power.
RN software is based on imperfect knowledge of the subject, such as France’s share of global greenhouse gas emissions or, more worryingly, man’s total responsibility for global warming. “Warming is indisputable but man’s role is not well defined: the IPCC [Groupe d’experts intergouvernemental sur l’évolution du climat]in itself, ignores what is anthropic and what is cyclical”says Mathilde Androuët. The most comprehensive summary on the issue, the IPCC’s latest summary report, published on March 20, 2023, is clear, however: it irrefutably attributes all current warming to human activities.
#Climate #inaction #line #conduct #accepted #National #Rally
How can emerging countries effectively utilize adaptation funds to combat climate change?
Interview: Tackling Climate Challenges Ahead of COP29
Interviewer: Time.news Editor
Guest Expert: Mathilde Androuët, MEP and climate policy commentator
Editor: Welcome, Mathilde Androuët! Thank you for joining us as we gear up for COP29. There’s a lot of discussion around the upcoming climate talks, particularly regarding the European Parliament’s stance. Could you detail the recent amendments proposed by the Russian Democratic Republic and its allies?
Androuët: Thank you for having me! Yes, ahead of COP29, there has been significant political maneuvering. The Russian Democratic Republic, along with certain European allies, has been pushing for amendments to the European Parliament’s resolution. Their goal seems to be minimizing the European Union’s commitments to reducing methane emissions while also easing the agricultural sector’s burden in greenhouse gas emissions.
Editor: That’s a concerning development. How do you view their attempts to dilute the fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty target?
Androuët: It’s quite alarming. The push to eliminate important targets, such as a treaty on the non-proliferation of fossil fuels, undermines the very foundation of what COP29 aims to achieve. We need stronger commitments to combat climate change, not weakened positions that prioritize short-term interests.
Editor: You mentioned skepticism surrounding the adaptation fund for emerging countries. Can you elaborate on that?
Androuët: Certainly. There’s a growing concern that global ecology often manifests as new financial products that are more about profit than real solutions. The reluctance stems from doubts about whether these funds genuinely reach those in need or if they end up in opaque systems without accountability. We need transparency and effectiveness in how climate funds are utilized, especially for the most vulnerable nations.
Editor: What do you believe is the role of politicians like Jordan Bardella from the National Rally in influencing climate policy, particularly given the context of the Carling coal plant?
Androuët: Politicians like Bardella play a critical role, especially in nations that are still heavily reliant on fossil fuels like coal. Their positions can either obstruct or advance necessary climate policies. In the case of the Carling coal plant, it highlights the tension between local economic interests and the global imperative to transition towards sustainable energy sources. We need strong leadership that understands the urgency of climate action, rather than just catering to regional interests.
Editor: What key message do you hope delegates will take away from COP29?
Androuët: I hope they grasp the importance of unity and accountability. Climate change is a collective challenge; we must support each other and prioritize funding that yields real environmental benefits. If we ignore these principles, we risk failing future generations. COP29 is an opportunity not just to talk but to make tangible commitments that reflect the urgency of the crisis.
Editor: Thank you, Mathilde, for sharing your insights. It’s evident that the road ahead will require vigilance and decisive action. We wish you the best as COP29 approaches!
Androuët: Thank you! It’s vital we stay engaged and informed as these discussions unfold. Together, we can pave the way for a sustainable future.
—
This concludes our interview about the multifaceted challenges facing global climate policy ahead of COP29. Stay tuned for more updates and expert opinions as we continue to dissect this critical topic.