Former ‘A Fazenda’ accused of racism also lives fighting with his mother and sister

by time news

The former participant​ of the reality show “A Fazenda”, Ana Paula‍ Minerato, 33 years old, ​was ‍accused of racism early this Monday. In an audio released by her, the ‌former makes ‍a series of racist comments against⁤ the ‍singer Ananda, from ​the group Melanina Carioca. After the accusation, Ana Paula was removed ⁢from‌ her position as ⁣muse of ‍Gaviões da⁤ Fiel, a samba school in São Paulo, ⁤and is no ⁣longer part of the band’s group of ⁤collaborators.

⁣ In⁢ the recordings, the model talks to rapper Kt Gomez, and questions whether he ended up​ with Ananda. In the conversation⁢ allegedly attributed to Ana Paula, she would use offensive terms to refer⁢ to the artist’s hair and skin. ⁢

⁣ Due‌ to ‍the impact of the audio and racist statements, Ana Paula lost her ​job as muse at Gaviões ⁣da Fiel, which, in 2025, will bring the Afro theme to the avenue. At Banna, she was employed since⁣ 2015 and worked as‍ a host of⁣ a‌ daily program on ‌Band FM radio.

⁢ “The band strongly rejects any form of racism, discrimination or prejudice.‌ The statements of Ana Paula Minerato,‍ although ⁢personal,‌ are not⁤ aligned with​ the values ​​and guidelines of the broadcaster. For this reason, the employee was dismissed⁣ from the ‍company ⁢”,⁤ it ​was reported.

‍⁤ The model and influence Ana ‍Paula Minerato, 33, was called on television as‌ “panicat” on‍ the program “Pânico”.⁣ The influence was also cast in two editions of the reality show “A Fazenda”, and was second in “A Fazenda ⁣8”, losing ‌the title to Douglas⁢ Sampaio. After that, she returned⁢ to​ the program in “A Fazenda Nova Chance”, becoming the eighth⁢ person to be evicted.

‍ ‌ Ana Paula ‌Minerato has a fight with her mother and her sister, Tati Minerato. The ‌two fought in 2019, due to an ⁣argument. Ana Paula and Tati do not speak to each other, and ⁣Sylvia Minerato, her mother, would have protected Tati. On social media, the sister spoke out ⁢about the ​accusation against Ana​ Paula.

​ “Today I came to speak out about a situation that left me⁢ very sad and shaken. First of all, I want⁣ to make it ‌clear that I am completely against any form of racism or prejudice. These attitudes do‍ not match the values ​​that I carry and that are part of my history! ⁣

However, taking into account what‍ happened​ to my sister,‌ Ana Paula ​Minerato, I must say, as much as the love for my ⁢family cannot be denied, I‍ cannot ⁤and should not be associated with attitudes which is not in line with what I believe in ​it. I deeply regret this episode and I reiterate that ‍I have never‍ supported or will support any attitude that ignores or attacks another person.

My commitment⁢ will always be⁢ to build a future where respect,⁣ inclusion and equality are inalienable values. ​This ⁤is how ⁤I live and how I want to continue my journey, in samba and in all areas of my life.”

As the racism suffered by Vini ‍Jr. ​in Spain to‌ revive the⁣ world

How can public figures better navigate ​their influence on social issues‍ like racism?

Interview between Time.news Editor and ​Racism and Media ⁣Expert Dr. Mariana Torres

Editor:‍ Welcome, Dr. Torres! Thank⁤ you for joining us today to discuss⁤ the recent controversy surrounding Ana Paula ‌Minerato and the audio⁢ recordings that⁢ have sparked accusations of racism against her.

Dr. Torres: Thank you for having me. It’s an important topic that needs to ⁣be addressed with care and consideration.

Editor: Absolutely. To start off, could you summarize what happened with Ana Paula Minerato for our ​readers?

Dr. Torres: Certainly. Ana Paula ‌Minerato,⁣ a ⁤former reality ⁤show contestant and model,‌ was recorded ‌making derogatory remarks about Ananda, a singer ⁣from ⁣the group ‍Melanina Carioca. The audio,‍ which surfaced recently, featured‍ Ana Paula using offensive terms related to Ananda’s hair and skin ⁤color. As⁣ a result, ‍she was swiftly removed from ⁣her role as a muse for the Gaviões da Fiel samba school ⁣in São Paulo and dismissed from her ⁤job at Band ⁣FM radio, where she had worked since 2015.

Editor:‍ It’s quite shocking, especially ⁤given the⁢ strong response from her employers. ‌Gaviões da Fiel stated they do not condone racism in any form. ⁢What does this say about the​ industry’s stance ​on ⁣discrimination?

Dr. Torres: It reflects a⁢ growing awareness and intolerance of racism within ⁢the media and entertainment sectors. Organizations are increasingly ‌held⁤ accountable⁢ for their affiliations, and the consequences for discriminatory ​remarks or behaviors are more pronounced. This⁣ incident serves as a reminder‍ that public figures,⁢ especially in the ⁤entertainment realm, are expected to uphold certain values,‌ particularly in an inclusive society.

Editor: In your opinion, how does this incident influence the broader conversation about‍ racism and representation in media?

Dr. Torres: It’s a double-edged sword. On one hand, it ⁢highlights ⁤the persistent​ issue of racism that many individuals face, particularly in the performance arts. ‍On the other hand, ⁣it opens‍ the floor for vital discussions about the representation of marginalized groups in ‌media. The backlash against Ana ​Paula’s comments⁢ signals to society that we ‍are no longer willing to tolerate‌ prejudice⁢ and discrimination. It creates space for dialogues around ‌how ⁤we portray and empower artists from diverse backgrounds.

Editor: Ana Paula’s ‌past as a⁣ “panicat” on the television show “Pânico” and her participation in reality shows like “A Fazenda” has⁤ placed her in the public eye for years. ​How⁤ do such platforms⁣ shape public⁣ figures’ perceptions and actions?

Dr. Torres: Reality television often‌ blurs the lines between ​persona and reality. Participants like Ana Paula are shaped by producers’ narratives, and this⁤ can lead to a form of entitlement ⁤or ⁣a disconnect with the​ realities faced by others. However,⁣ it ​also grants them significant influence. This duality can embolden public figures to⁣ speak without considering the impact ⁢of their words, which can inadvertently perpetuate harmful stereotypes.

Editor: You mentioned that​ her sister,‍ Tati Minerato, also spoke out against Ana Paula following ⁣the accusation.⁣ How do ‌family dynamics​ complicate public controversies like this?

Dr. Torres: Family dynamics, particularly​ in high-stress situations ​such ⁢as⁢ public controversies, can amplify tensions ⁣and lead to fracturing relationships. Tati ‌and‌ Ana​ Paula’s history ​of conflict adds a layer of complexity⁣ to the situation.‍ When personal relationships ‌intertwine with public scrutiny, it​ creates a situation where loyalty and accountability ⁣may clash, making it harder for ‌individuals ⁣to navigate ⁤their responses in‌ healthy ways.

Editor: Given this ‍surge ‌of ‌attention and the swift ‍consequences Ana Paula faced, what message do you think ⁣this sends to other public figures?

Dr. Torres: It⁣ sends a ⁤strong ⁣message ​that accountability⁣ is paramount. Public figures are tasked with representing their communities, and with ⁢that comes the⁤ responsibility to act ‍in ways that are not harmful to others. ‌The ⁤repercussions faced by Ana Paula serve as ⁤a deterrent, encouraging individuals ‍to⁤ think carefully about their⁢ words⁢ and actions, knowing they can have serious implications both personally and professionally.

Editor:‌ Thank you, Dr. ⁢Torres, for your insights on this pressing⁣ issue. It’s crucial that ‌we continue to‌ have‌ these conversations to ​foster a ‌more inclusive media landscape.

Dr. Torres: Thank you for addressing such an important topic. Open dialogues are the first step toward real change.

You may also like

Leave a Comment