Gerardo Fernandez Noroñapresident of the Senate of Mexico, exploded against Donald Trump for him new tariff of the 25% announced by the president-elect of the United States.
Through his X account, the president of the Board of Directors of the Senate of Mexico shared a message about the threat that Donald Trump made around the imposition of a new tariff.
Given the warning made by the president-elect of the United States, Noroña He attacked him and even questioned how the announcement he made should be responded to.
Gerardo Fernández Norona (Gerardo Fernández Noroña via X)
Noroña explodes against Donald Trump due to threat of new tariff
The elected president of the United States, Donald Trumpannounced that from day 1 of his government he will impose a new tariff 25% on all Mexican products that enter your country.
In this regard, Donald Trump indicated that this is a measure to demand that the Mexican authorities stop migration and drug trafficking that he accused, “invaded” the United States.
Following the announcement of the tariff quotas that will also be applied to Canada, the president of the Senate of MexicoGerardo Fernandez Noroñashared a message in which he expressed your annoyance.
In her publication, Norona He launched against the elected president of the United States, because he questioned the possibility that Mexico responds in the same way to measure.
The above is because in the message, the senator from the PT bench asked about What type of tariff should Mexico apply? to some of the products originating in the United States.
Noroña launches a harsh blow against the United States
In the response that Gerardo Fernández Noroña expressed before him Donald Trump announcement on new tariffs against Mexico, senator threw a hard dart against the United States.
In the tweet he shared regarding Donald Trump’s announcement about the executive order he would impose on January 20, the federal legislator asked if Mexico must respond the same.
When raising the question, Noroña emulated Donald Trump’s threatssince it indicated that Mexico’s tariff would be in force until In the United States a couple of things are true.
Firstly, the member of the PT parliamentary faction indicated that taxes on American products will be in force until that country stop using drugs.
Regarding the second, the president of the Senate of Mexico said that the quotas on “merchandise” from the United States would not be withdrawn until until they stop importing illegal weapons into the country.
How does social media influence political responses and public sentiment during international conflicts?
Interview between Time.news Editor and Political Analyst on Gerardo Fernández Noroña’s Response to Donald Trump’s Proposed Tariffs
Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome, everyone, to our special segment where we dissect recent geopolitical events. Today, we have a prominent political analyst, Dr. Laura Martinez, with us to discuss Gerardo Fernández Noroña’s explosive reaction to Donald Trump’s recent announcement. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Martinez!
Dr. Laura Martinez (DLM): Thank you for having me, it’s a pleasure to be here.
TNE: Let’s dive right in. Just to give our viewers some context, Noroña, the President of the Senate of Mexico, reacted strongly against Trump’s proposition of a 25% tariff on Mexican goods. What’s your initial take on Noroña’s response?
DLM: Noroña’s response was a blend of outrage and assertiveness. His role as the president of the Senate carries significant weight, and his public message on X illustrates the seriousness with which Mexico is taking Trump’s threats. It also reflects the sentiment many Mexicans feel—concerned but defiant.
TNE: Noroña mentioned the possibility of a reciprocal response from Mexico. How feasible do you think it is for Mexico to impose its own tariffs in return?
DLM: It’s a complicated scenario. On one hand, Mexico could theoretically impose tariffs in retaliation, which would not only impact the U.S. economy but could also harm Mexican businesses that rely on exports. However, the interdependence of the U.S. and Mexican economies means that such a move could backfire. Hence, while feasible, it would require careful consideration of the potential economic fallout.
TNE: Trump cites his reason for the tariffs as a measure to combat migration and drug trafficking. How do you perceive this justification?
DLM: Trump’s framing of the issue is problematic. It reduces complex socio-economic issues into simplistic terms for political gain. The truth is that migration and drug trafficking are multifaceted challenges that cannot be solved through tariffs. Such actions tend to exacerbate tensions rather than foster cooperation on these pivotal issues.
TNE: Noroña’s comments on social media captured a lot of attention. How significant do you think social media is in shaping political discourse these days?
DLM: Social media has become an essential platform for political leaders to express their views and rally public sentiment. Noroña’s choice to use X shows a strategic move to engage directly with the public, bypassing traditional media filters. It allows him to galvanize supporters and put pressure on the government to respond decisively without the delays that typically accompany official statements.
TNE: With the ongoing tensions and the potential for economic fallout, what strategies do you think Mexico should adopt moving forward?
DLM: Mexico needs to focus on diplomatic channels to address and de-escalate tensions. Engaging in dialog, perhaps with the help of international organizations, can be a more productive approach than direct confrontation. Additionally, strengthening trade relationships with other countries may help mitigate the impact of any tariffs imposed by the U.S.
TNE: Lastly, how do you see this conflict influencing the future of Mexico-U.S. relations, especially with Trump entering the presidency again?
DLM: The future of Mexico-U.S. relations will hinge on how both leaders manage their rhetoric and actions. If both sides can adopt a more collaborative approach, there could be opportunities for joint solutions, particularly regarding trade and security issues. However, if they delve deeper into confrontation, we could see a deterioration that would harm both nations and their economies. This will certainly be a crucial aspect to watch in the upcoming months.
TNE: Thank you, Dr. Martinez, for your insights. It seems like this situation is evolving and will require careful navigation from both countries. We appreciate your expertise!
DLM: Thank you for having me. It’s always a pleasure to discuss these important issues.