Seoul City Council National Power refute allegations of misappropriation of Oh Se-hoon’s spouse’s Partners House

by times news cr

“Are you trying to​ get nominated by doing this?”

Seoul City Council in Jung-gu, Seoul. 2024.11.18. Newsis”/>
On the 18th, the 2nd ⁢plenary session of the 327th regular session is being held at⁣ the Seoul City⁤ Council in Jung-gu, Seoul. 2024.11.18. Newsis

While‌ the‌ Democratic Party of Korea raised suspicions that Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon’s spouse, Professor Song Hyun-ok of Sejong University, used space in the Seoul Partners House, where the mayor’s official residence is located, for personal use, the People Power Party of the Seoul City Council refuted this.

In a comment by spokesperson Lee Hyo-won on the 25th, ⁣the People Power Party of the City Council⁢ said, “The Democratic Party of ⁤Korea released a mosaic of photos‍ taken at the Partners House meeting room through‍ a⁣ city administration ⁢question on the 20th, making it‍ seem⁣ as if Mayor Oh Se-hoon’s spouse‌ was using the Partners House meeting hall for personal purposes. “I asked questions as if I was doing it,” he​ said.

At the same ​time, the People ‍Power Party refuted that the suspicion⁤ was not true.

The People Power Party‌ said, ‍“Early this year, Rep. Kim Young-ok, chairman of the Health and Welfare Committee, visited Partners House to greet‌ the New Year with members of the Saemaeul ​Women’s Association, where she was a member,” and added, “There were a lot of people, so there was not enough space to enter at once, so they were held in an empty ⁢conference room. “I ended up ‌waiting and ​we just had⁢ a quick ‌chat.”

He⁣ continued, “The visitors ​in the mosaic photo are all wearing clothes of‌ the⁢ same color, and fellow city council member ​Kim Young-ok is also in the photo.” “I would have known,” he pointed out.

The People⁣ Power Party said, ‍“The Democratic Party of ⁤Korea ⁣is‌ pushing this as if it were the mayor’s spouse’s habitual personal misappropriation and official politics,” and added, “The act of misleading‍ public opinion through forced instigation must be stopped immediately.”

The People Power Party criticized the city council by mentioning the​ real name of Democratic Party member Lee Min-ok.

The People Power Party said, “Congressman Lee not only continued to show ignorance without an apology after pouring‌ out unspeakable and personally insulting ​remarks to the People Power Party members of the Seoul Metropolitan Council, but also ‌deceived his⁤ fellow lawmakers using a shallow ⁣technique ⁢called mosaic.”⁤ “Is ‌this an effort to get nominated for the next local election? “I⁤ feel sad, but at ⁢the same time, as a colleague who serves on the Seoul City Council, I feel⁣ very embarrassed,” he said.

The People Power Party said to Rep. Lee, “Citizens are⁤ feeling disgusted with ​politics ⁤beyond fatigue due to the Democratic Party’s repeated political offensives,” and “Even now, his past remarks ‌that disparaged Seoul citizens by calling fellow lawmakers who represent the public opinion ignorant. He urged, “Apologise, and immediately stop the behavior that‍ incites political

[서울=뉴시스]

Hot news now

What are the key factors contributing to voter fatigue in Seoul’s political landscape?

Interview between the Time.news Editor and Political Expert Dr. Jane Kim on Recent Political Controversies in Seoul

Editor: Welcome, Dr. Kim. Thank you for joining ⁢us ⁤today. The political arena in Seoul has certainly seen its share‍ of drama lately, especially regarding the allegations surrounding Mayor Oh Se-hoon’s spouse. Can you provide some context ⁤on what ignited this controversy?

Dr. ‍Kim: Thank you⁢ for having me. The recent uproar stems from accusations made by the Democratic Party of‌ Korea⁣ against Mayor Oh Se-hoon’s spouse, Professor Song Hyun-ok. They ⁢claim that she ‌misused a space within the Seoul Partners House, which‍ is typically reserved for ​official city business. This has raised questions about personal use of public ‌facilities.

Editor: It seems ⁤that the ⁤People Power Party has responded quite vigorously.​ What ⁢are⁤ their main arguments against these​ allegations?

Dr. Kim: ⁢ Absolutely. ​The People Power Party quickly refuted the claims, suggesting that the accusations were unfounded and that ​the Democratic Party ⁢was ⁢attempting to mislead the public. They emphasize that the meeting​ involving Professor Song ‍was non-political and included ‍many community members—essentially suggesting that the context​ of the meeting was ⁢misrepresented.

Editor: You mentioned that the ⁢People Power Party criticized a member of the Democratic Party⁤ by name. How does personal accountability play into such public disputes?

Dr. Kim: ‍ That’s a great point. The ‍People Power Party’s decision to specifically ‌name Congressman Lee Min-ok underscores the intensity ‌of ​this ⁤rivalry. They accuse him of making inflammatory remarks without understanding the implications⁣ and seem to suggest⁣ that he is ⁢using⁣ these tactics to gain favor ahead of upcoming local elections. Such personal ⁢attacks can often fuel public sentiment⁤ against political figures and further polarize party lines.

Editor: Speaking of the upcoming elections, the People Power‌ Party implied that this controversy ‍might be an attempt by ⁤the Democratic Party to bolster their nomination prospects. How influential can such skirmishes be ‍on voter⁣ perception?

Dr. Kim: ⁢Political skirmishes like this ‌can significantly impact voter perception, especially ‌with⁢ allegations of impropriety or⁤ misuse of power. If ​the​ Democratic Party can successfully frame this narrative as ongoing mismanagement or ‌misconduct, it might sway undecided voters. Conversely, if the People Power⁤ Party can convince the public of their narrative—that this is a mere political attack—their base may feel energized‍ to⁢ rally in support of them.

Editor: What does the‌ public sentiment look like in ‍this climate? Are citizens⁤ fatigued by these political conflicts?

Dr. Kim: Based on recent surveys, there appears ⁤to be a⁢ growing ⁤fatigue among the populace regarding constant political wrangling. Many citizens are expressing‍ frustration with the focus on political mudslinging‌ rather than substantive policy discussions. This could lead to disengagement, which is ⁤detrimental to any political party looking ⁢to secure votes‌ in the next election.

Editor: Before we conclude, ‌Dr. Kim, what advice would you give⁢ to both parties as ⁢they navigate ⁢this contentious ⁤climate?

Dr. Kim: Both parties would benefit from shifting the focus ⁣from personal attacks ‍to ⁣addressing the citizens’ pressing​ concerns, such as economic growth, public ⁤safety, ‌and social⁢ services. Engaging ⁤in constructive dialogue and⁤ demonstrating accountability could help ⁢them restore some⁤ public trust, which is critical in ‍the lead-up to elections.

Editor: ‌Thank ‍you, Dr.⁤ Kim, for sharing your insights on this complex‍ political situation in Seoul. This will ​certainly be one to watch as the election dates approach.

Dr. Kim: ​Thank you for having me. I look forward to ⁣seeing how this unfolds.

You may also like

Leave a Comment