Pointing out Japan’s ‘non-fulfillment of promises’… The content of the consultation continues to be muted.
The government is seeking an ‘exit strategy’ without providing a detailed explanation for the ‘Sado Mine Memorial Ceremony’ controversy. Even in the two briefings held on the 26th, no ‘clear answer’ was provided regarding the controversy over the Japanese representative’s visit to Yasukuni Shrine and the contents of the Korea-Japan discussions regarding the memorial speech.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs disclosed on this day that the government had expressed regret to Japan through the Japanese Embassy in Korea, and a press briefing was then held by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson and the second vice minister.
Second Vice Minister Kang In-seon reiterated the government’s position that the fact that our government did not attend the ‘Sado Mine Memorial Ceremony’ hosted by Japan and held a separate memorial ceremony with the bereaved families was “an expression of our firm will not to compromise with either side on past history.” revealed.
When Sado Mine was listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site last July, it was pointed out that Japan was not properly fulfilling its promises regarding the memorial ceremony.
On the one hand, Vice Minister Kang said, “We plan to communicate closely with the Japanese side so that the memorial service issue can be managed as an individual issue that does not affect the overall Korea-Japan relationship,” adding that the Yoon Seok-yeol government’s will for ‘future-oriented Korea-Japan relations’ remains unchanged. confirmed. It was a remark that could be interpreted as a stance to take the issue of past history and the improvement of Korea-Japan relations through separate paths.
However, despite the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ statement of its position, there was insufficient explanation of the key issues that led to our absence from the memorial service.
A high-ranking official from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs also met with reporters on this day and asked, ‘What kind of attitude did Japan express during the consultation process?’, ‘What was agreed upon between Korea and Japan at the time of UNESCO registration in July’, and ‘Yasukuni Shrine by Political Affairs Officer Ikuina. He was virtually silent about whether there was any explanation from the Japanese side regarding the history of visiting the shrine.
This high-ranking official mentioned that it would be difficult for one side to unilaterally disclose the contents of discussions between the diplomatic authorities of Korea and Japan, and only repeated the phrase, “It is difficult to explain in detail.”
The government previously stated that the key reason for Japan’s absence from the memorial service was the failure to properly discuss the memorial speech, but no explanation was provided as to what the government took issue with in the memorial speech and what Japan’s reaction was.
In addition, the government provided a clear explanation for the fact that Kyodo News corrected a report from two years ago that the Japanese government representative, Akiko Ikuina, a political affairs official, visited Yasukuni Shrine as a member of the House of Councilors on August 15, 2022, only on the 25th, the previous day, as a misreport. There was no.
As the date of the memorial service was announced on the 20th and reports on political affairs officer Ikuina Ikuina’s ‘power’ were reported, related issues have been raised steadily, but it has not been confirmed in detail how the government responded to this.
A high-ranking official at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on this day, “The past is important as it is, and the future cooperation in Korea-Japan relations is important as cooperation, so it goes along two axes,” with the intention of managing the situation so that this issue does not further escalate into a diplomatic issue between Korea and Japan. This suggests that there will be no additional explanation from the government regarding the Sado Mine controversy.
(Seoul = News 1)
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
<button class="emotion_btn recomm" data-event_name="click_content_event" data-ep_button_name="기사 추천"
Hot news now
What are the implications of South Korea’s decision not to attend the Sado Mine Memorial Ceremony for Japan-Korea relations?
The article discusses a recent controversy surrounding the “Sado Mine Memorial Ceremony” in Japan, specifically regarding the tension between Korea and Japan over historical interpretations and memorial practices. The South Korean government opted not to attend Japan’s memorial ceremony for victims of forced labor at Sado Mine, signaling a strong stance on historical issues.
Key points from the article include:
- Sado Mine Ceremony: The South Korean officials expressed their absence from the Japanese-hosted memorial as a firm commitment to not compromise on historical disputes.
- Communication with Japan: The South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicated they remain committed to maintaining a future-oriented relationship with Japan while managing historical issues separately.
- UNESCO Heritage Status: The Sado Mine was designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, raising concerns about how Japan addresses its historical responsibilities.
- Diplomatic Tensions: The South Korean government has faced questions and criticism for not providing detailed explanations regarding the controversial aspects of the memorial service and Japan’s Yasukuni Shrine visits.
- Future Cooperation: Despite the controversies, officials suggested that both nations need to cooperate moving forward, although the handling of past issues continues to be contentious.
This summary highlights the complexity of Korea-Japan historical relations and the diplomatic balancing act both countries are attempting to navigate in light of these sensitive issues.